SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 29

Türkiye'de toplumsal cinsiyet temelli yoksulluk yaklaşımı kapsamında şartlı nakit transferi programı üzerine eleştirel bir değerlendirme

A critical assessment on the conditional cash transfer programme in the context of gendered poverty in Turkey

Mehmet Ali KÜÇÜKÇAVUŞ
Pages
45–64
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This article will be concluded a critical discussion on whether or not the CCT programme in Turkey could be a significant remedy to the problems caused by gendered nature of poverty.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article attempts to critically discuss the relation between the gendered nature of poverty and outputs of Conditional Cash Transfer (CCT) programme of Turkey, a poverty reduction programme that has been designed to break the intergenerational transmission of poverty by investing long-term development of human capital in poor families since the CCT programme is argued to have a strong gender perspective.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore, this article will first address the discussions on relation between poverty and gender from the perspective of feminisation of poverty and gendered poverty approaches which are used synonymously in this article.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This article will be concluded a critical discussion on whether or not the CCT programme in Turkey could be a significant remedy to the problems caused by gendered nature of poverty.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This article attempts to critically discuss the relation between the gendered nature of poverty and outputs of Conditional Cash Transfer (CCT) programme of Turkey, a poverty reduction programme that has been designed to break the intergenerational transmission of poverty by investing long-term development of human capital in poor families since the CCT programme is argued to have a strong gender perspective. Therefore, this article will first address the discussions on relation between poverty and gender from the perspective of feminisation of poverty and gendered poverty approaches which are used synonymously in this article. Later, the article will attempt to picture gendered nature of poverty in Turkey using various resources. This article will be concluded a critical discussion on whether or not the CCT programme in Turkey could be a significant remedy to the problems caused by gendered nature of poverty.

Özet

Bu makale, yoksulluğun toplumsal cinsiyet temelli doğası ile güçlü bir toplumsal cinsiyet vurgusuna sahip olduğu savunulan ve yoksul hanelerin uzun dönemli insani sermayesine yatırımda bulunarak yoksulluğun nesiller arası geçişine engel olmayı amaçlayan Şartlı Nakit Transferi (ŞNT) programının çıktıları arasındaki ilişkiyi eleştirel bir şekilde tartışmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu nedenle, bu çalışma öncelikle eşanlamlı olarak kullandığı yoksulluğun feminizasyonu ve toplumsal cinsiyet temelli yoksulluk yaklaşımları bağlamında yoksulluk ve toplumsal cinsiyet ilişkisini tartışacak, sonra çeşitli kaynakları kullanarak ülkemizdeki toplumsal cinsiyet temelli yoksulluğa dair genel bir resim oluşturmaya çalışacaktır. Makale ülkemizde uygulanan programının toplumsal cinsiyet temelli yoksulluğun neden olduğu sorunlara etki bir çare olup olamayacağını tartışan bir bölümle sona erecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÜÇÜKÇAVUŞ, M. A. (2022). Türkiye'de toplumsal cinsiyet temelli yoksulluk yaklaşımı kapsamında şartlı nakit transferi programı üzerine eleştirel bir değerlendirme. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 29, 45–64. https://ajindex.com/articles/592415

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Akin, A. (2003),
  2. Gender Issues in Health. In F. Acar, Bridging the Gap in Turkey: A Milestone Towards Faster Socio-Economic Development and Poverty Reduction (pp.54-72). Washington: The World Bank. Bellamy, K., Rake, K. (2005), Money Money Money Is it still a richman’s world? An audit of women’s economic welfare in Britain today, London: Fawcett Society. Bellamy, K., Bennet, F., Millat, J. (2005), Who benefits? A gender analysis of the UK benefits and tax credit system, London: Fawcett Society. BRIDGE. (1997), Gender Inequality and Poverty: Trends, Linkages, Analysis and Policy Implications (Report No 30), Brighton: Bridge Institute of Development Studies University of Sussex. BRIDGE. (2001), Briefing paper on the ‘feminisation of poverty’ (No Reference Number), Brighton: Bridge Institute of Development Studies University of Sussex. Bugra, A., Keyder, C. (2005), Poverty and Social Inclusion in Contemporary Turkey, Istanbul: Bogazici University Social Policy Forum. Bugra, A., Keyder, C. (2006), Social Assistance in Turkey: For a Policy of Minimum Income Support Conditional on Socially Beneficial Activity, Ankara:
  3. UNDP. Bugra, A., Keyder, C. (2008), Kent Nufusunun En Yoksul Kesiminin ˙Istihdam Yapısı ve Gecinme Yontemleri (‘Employment Structure and Subsistence Strategies of the Urban Poor in Turkey’), Istanbul: Bogazici University Social Policy Forum. Bugra, A., Yakut, C. B. (2010), Structural Change, the Social Policy Environment and Female Employment in Turkey, Development and Change, 41(3), pp. 517-538.
  4. Candas, A., Bugra, A. (Eds). (2010), Turkiye’de Esitsizlikler: Kalici Esitsizliklere Genel Bir Bakis (Inequalities in Turkey: An Overview to Permanent Inequalities), Istanbul: Bogazici University Social Policy Forum. Chant, S. H. (2006), Re-thinking the “feminization of poverty” in relation to aggregate gender indices. Journal of Human Development, 7 (2), pp. 201-220. De la Brière, B., Rawlings, L. B. (2006), Examining Conditional Cash Transfer Programs: A Role for Increased Social Inclusion, The Word Bank Social Protection Series, 0603, pp. 4-27.
  5. Elveren, A. Y., Hsu, S. (2007), Gender Gaps in the Individual Pension System in Turkey, South Lake City: University of Utah Department of Economics. Esenyel, C., Torun, G. (2010, October), Conditional Cash Transfer Programme in Turkey, Paper presented at the International Symposium on Poverty Alleviation Strategies, Prime Ministry of Turkey General Directorate of Social Assistance and Solidarity, Istanbul. GDSAS.