Journals / Selçuk Tıp Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2

Endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy and bicanalicular silicone tube intubation

Endoskopik endonazal dakriyosistorinostomi ve bikanaliküler silikon tüp entübasyonu

Pages
82–86
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

If necessary additional management of intranasal pathology can be performedsimultaneously.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To evaluate the results of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) andbicanalicular silicone tube intubation (BSTI) performed in patients with nasolacrimal canalobstructions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Endoscopic endonasal DCR combined with BSTI was appliedin 43 eyesof 38 patients (bilaterally in 5 patients), and in 2 patients who werepreviously failed externalDCR operation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:If necessary additional management of intranasal pathology can be performedsimultaneously.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the results of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) andbicanalicular silicone tube intubation (BSTI) performed in patients with nasolacrimal canalobstructions. Methods: Endoscopic endonasal DCR combined with BSTI was appliedin 43 eyesof 38 patients (bilaterally in 5 patients), and in 2 patients who werepreviously failed externalDCR operation. All patients underwent dacryocystography before the surgery. Four patients withdiagnosis of septal deviation underwent septoplasty simultaneously in the same session withendoscopic endonasal DCR with BSTI. Silicone tubes were left in place for about 6.4±2.7 months.The patency of the lacrimal passages was controlled with an evaluation of postoperative subjectivesymptoms and nasolacrimal lavage. Results: Follow-up period ranged from 6 to 48 months (mean25.3±9.4 months) postoperatively. The epiphora symptom disappeared and a successful drainagecould be maintained in 93.02% of primary endoscopic DCR+BSTI and 100% of revision endoscopicDSR+BSTI cases. Conclusion: The endoscopic endonasal approach may be a succesful procedurein the management of lacrimal stenosis both after failed external dacryocystorhinostomy andprimary cases. If necessary additional management of intranasal pathology can be performedsimultaneously.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı endoskopik endonazal dakriyosistorinostomi (DSR) ve bikanalikülersilikon tüp entübasyonu (BSTE) yapılan olgulardaki sonuçları değerlendirmektir. Yöntem:Dakriyostenoz tanısı konan 38 olgunun 43 gözüne (5 olguda her iki göz) ve daha önce başarısızeksternal DSR operasyonu geçirmiş 2 olgunun 2 gözüne endoskopik endonazal DSR ile kombineBSTE uygulandı. Tüm olgulara ameliyat öncesi dakriyosistografi çekildi. Septal deviasyon saptanan4 olguya endoskopik DSR ve BSTE ile beraber eş zamanlı septoplasti ameliyatı yapıldı. Silikontüpler ortalama 6.4±2.7 ay nazolakrimal kanalda bırakıldı. Lakrimal pasajdaki açıklık hastalarınpostoperatif subjektif şikayetlerinin değerlendirilmesi ve nazolakrimal irrigasyon yapılarakkontrol edildi. Bulgular: Ortalama takip süresi 25.3±9.4 ay (6-48 ay) idi. Primer endoskopikDSR+BSTE yapılan olguların %93.02’sinde, revizyon endoskopik DSR+BSTE yapılan olgularınise hepsinde (%100) postoperatif dönemde epifora semptomları geriledi ve başarılı drenaj eldeedildi. Sonuç: Primer lakrimal stenozlu olgularda ve başarısız eksternal DSR geçirmiş olgulardaendoskopik endonazal DSR+BSTE güvenli bir teknik olarak uygulanabilir. İntranazal patolojilerinbirlikteliğinde ilave cerrahi tedaviler DSR operasyonu ile eş zamanlı olarak yapılabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOPAL, Ö., KARALEZLİ, A., BOROZAN, M., ERBEK, S., AKOVA, Y. A. (2022). Endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy and bicanalicular silicone tube intubation. Selçuk Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2, 82–86. https://ajindex.com/articles/591878

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Whittet HB, Shun-Shin GA, Awdry P. Functional endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Eye 1993; 7:545-54
  2. Oba E, Gürsel O. Kronik dakriyosistitlerin tedavisinde yeni bir cerrahi yaklaşım: Endoskopik transnazal nakriyosistorinostomi. T Oft Gaz 1993; 23:468-70
  3. Tarbet KJ, Custer PL. External dacryocystorhinostomy. Surgical success, patient satisfaction and economic cost. Ophthalmology 1995; 102:1065-70
  4. Hurwitz JJ, Rutherfold S. Computerized survey of lacrimal surgery patients. Ophthalmology 1986; 93:14-19
  5. Caldwell GW. A new operation for the radical cure of obstruction of the nasal duct. N Y Med 1893; 58:476
  6. McDonogh M, Meiring JH. Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy. J Laryngol Otol 1989; 103:585-7
  7. Massaro BM, Gonnering RS, Harris GJ. Endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy: a new approach to nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Arch Ophthalmol 1990; 108: 1061-72
  8. Angrist RC, Dortzbach RK. Silicone intubation for partial and total nasolacrimal duct obstruction in adults. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 1985;1: 51-5
  9. Christenbury JD. Translacrimal laser dacryocystorhinostomy. Arch Ophthalmol 1992;110:170-1
  10. Levin PS, Stormogipson DJ. Endocanalicular laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy. An anotomic study. Arch Ophthalmol 1992; 110:1488-90
  11. Pery JD, Maus M, Novinski TS, Penne RB. Balloon catheter dilatation for treatment of adults with partial nasolacrimal duct obstruction: a preliminary report. Am J Ophthalmol 1998; 126:811-6
  12. Ben Simon GJ, Joseph J, Lee S, et al. External versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction in a tertiary referral center. Ophthalmology 2005; 112:1463-68
  13. Nussbaumer M, Schreiber S, Yung MW. Concomitant nasal procedures in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. J Laryngol Otol 2004; 118:267-9 14. Kamel R, El-Deen HG, El-Deen YS, et al. Manometric measurement of lacrimal sac pressure after endoscopic and external dacryocystorhinostomy. Acta Otolaryngol 2003; 123: 325-9
  14. Hartikainen J, Grenman K, Puukka P, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy and endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmology 1998; 105:1106-1113
  15. Sprekelsen MB, Barberan MT. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: Surgical technique and results. Laryngoscope 1996; 106:187-9
  16. Akiner M, Anadolu Y, Akturk T, et al. Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy. ENT Head Neck Surg 1996; 4:86-9
  17. Zilelioğlu G, Ugurbaş SH. Lakrimal sistem cerra