Journals / Selçuk İletişim / 2008 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3

Barrier in Front of the Corporate Success: Toxic Communication

Kurumsal Başarının Önündeki Engel: Zehirli (Toksit) İletişim

Pages
124–140
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study includes suggestions to create and maintain a healthy organization atmosphere, focusing on how a poisonous communication has existed in an organization and what should be done to hinder it.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In information and communication era, the organizations which are trying to exist face with some important problems about managing formal and informal knowledge.
📊
Key Findings & Data:When the poisonous effects which are spreading in the organization and gradually taking it under control haven’t been realised, the productivity may decrease, additionally even keeping the organization alive may often become risky.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study includes suggestions to create and maintain a healthy organization atmosphere, focusing on how a poisonous communication has existed in an organization and what should be done to hinder it.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In information and communication era, the organizations which are trying to exist face with some important problems about managing formal and informal knowledge. Especially the informal knowledge transfers among the workers for some reasons sometimes get different form the way which has been idealised. Poisonous communication which is felt by verbal communication (rumours and gossip etc.) also shown by nonverbal communication means and attitudes in the organizations may negatively affect both the employees and the managers. This drags the organization away from the condition with good relationships to the poor one. When the poisonous effects which are spreading in the organization and gradually taking it under control haven’t been realised, the productivity may decrease, additionally even keeping the organization alive may often become risky. This study includes suggestions to create and maintain a healthy organization atmosphere, focusing on how a poisonous communication has existed in an organization and what should be done to hinder it.

Özet

Bilgi ve iletişim çağında varlığını sürdürme çabası veren kurumlar formal (resmi) ve informal (resmi olmayan) bilginin yönetimi konusunda önemli problemlerle karşı karşıya kalmaktadır. Özellikle bir kurumda çok çeşitli nedenlerle çalışanlar arasında informal bilginin işleyişi, zaman zaman idealize edilen biçimden uzaklaşmaktadır. Genel olarak kurumlarda dedikodu ve söylenti gibi sözlü iletişim ile hissettirilen aynı zamanda da sözsüz iletişim unsurları ve davranışlar ile ortaya konulan zehirli iletişim, hem çalışanları hem de yöneticileri olumsuz olarak etkileyebilmektedir. Bu durum bir kurumu sağlıklı ilişkiler boyutundan uzaklaştırarak hastalıklı bir konuma doğru sürüklemektedir. Kurum içinde yayılan ve giderek kurumu hâkimiyeti altına alan zehirli etkiler fark edilmediğinde verimlilikte bir azalma söz konusu olabilmekte, bununla birlikte birçok zaman kurumun varlığını devam ettirmesi dahi tehlikeli bir hal almaktadır. Bu çalışmada, bir kurumda zehirli iletişimin nasıl ortaya çıktığı ve zehirli iletişimi önlemek için neler yapılması gerektiği konusuna odaklanılarak sağlıklı bir kurum atmosferinin oluşturulup korunması için önerilere yer verilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BİTİRİM, S., TEMEL, A. E. (2022). Barrier in Front of the Corporate Success: Toxic Communication. Selçuk İletişim, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3, 124–140. https://ajindex.com/articles/591671

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (24)

  1. Akat İ, Budak G ve Budak G (1999)
  2. İşletme Yönetimi, Beta Yayınları,
  3. İzmir Appelbaum S H ve Roy-Girard D (2007) Toxins in the Workplace: Affect on Organizations and Employees, Corporate Governance, 7 (1), 17-28.
  4. Appelbaum S H, Iaconi G D ve Matousek A (2007) Positive and Negative Deviant Workplace Behaviors: Causes, Impacts, and Solutions, Corporate Governance 7(5), 586-598. Bacal R http://www.work911.com/htm, 21.11. 2007.
  5. Bennet R (1994)
  6. Organizational Communication, M&E Handbook Series, Singapore. Bernard G ve Yoshihiko M (2006)
  7. Analyzing Rumors, Gossip and Urban Legends Through Their Conversational Properties, The Psychological Record, 56, 23-34.
  8. Crampton S M, Hodge J W ve Mishra J M (1998) The Informal Communication Network: Factors Influencing Grapevine Activity, Public Personel Management, 27 (4), 569-584.
  9. Davis K (1984) Human Behavior at Work Organizational Behavior, Sixth Edition,
  10. Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, New Delhi. Dicle Ü(1974) Bir Yönetim Aracı Olarak Örgütsel Haberleşme, Milli Prodüktivite Merkezi Yayınları,
  11. Ankara.
  12. Difonzo N ve Bordia P (1998) A Tale of Two Corporations: Managing Uncertainity During Organizational Change, Human Resource Management, 37 (¾), 295-303.
  13. Eder D ve Lynne E J (1991), The Structure of Gossip: Opportunities and Constraints on Collective Expressions Among Adolescents, American Social Review, 56 (4), 494-508.
  14. Eroğlu E (2005) Yöneticilerin Dedikodu ve Söylentiye Yönelik Davranış Biçimlerinin Belirlenme-si (Arfor Taşıma Hizmetleri A.Ş.’de Bir Uygulama), Manas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Derg, 13, 203-218.
  15. Flynn G, Stop Toxic Managers Before They Stop You, http://career advice.monster.com/ management-skills/human-resources/ management/Stop-Toxic-Managers-Before-They-Sto/home.aspx, 21.11.2007.
  16. Frost P J (2004) Handling Toxic Emotions: New Challenges for Leaders and their Organization, Organizational Dynamics,33 (2), 111-127.
  17. Goldman A (2006) High Toxicity Leadership Borderline Personality Disorder and the Dysfunctional Organization, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21 (8), 733-746.
  18. Guerin B ve Yoshihiko M (2006),
  19. Analyzing Rumors, Gossip and Urban Legends Through Their Conversational Properties, The Psychological Record, 56, 23-34.
  20. Guerin B (2003) Language Use As Social Strategy: A Review and An Analytic Framework For The Social Sciences, Review of General Psychology, 7, 251-298.
  21. Henley K (2003)
  22. Innovative Leader, Winston Brill-Articles, 12 (6), 571-600.
  23. Kapferer, J N (1990)
  24. Dünyanın En Eski Medyası, Dedikodu & S