Journals / Selcuk Dental Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Biomechanical Comparison of Different Fixation Systemsafter Le Fort I Advancement Osteotomy: An in Vitro Study

Le Fort I İlerletme Osteotomisi Sonrası Farklı FiksasyonSistemlerinin Biyomekanik Olarak Karşılaştırması: İn VitroÇalışma

Pages
729–735
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However,further in vitro and in vivo studies needs to be conducted toconfirm these results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: The aim of this study is to explore the effect offive different plate-screw systems on the stability after LeFort Iosteotomy in polyurethane skull models.Materials and Methods: Standard titanium miniplates, titaniummicroplates and bioabsorbable plates were applied for theinternal fixation of artificially created LeFort I osteotomy onpolyurethane skulls.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: Significant differences were observed among thedisplacement values of five fixation systems at 120, 150, 180and 200 N of loading (p< 0.05).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However,further in vitro and in vivo studies needs to be conducted toconfirm these results.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to explore the effect offive different plate-screw systems on the stability after LeFort Iosteotomy in polyurethane skull models.Materials and Methods: Standard titanium miniplates, titaniummicroplates and bioabsorbable plates were applied for theinternal fixation of artificially created LeFort I osteotomy onpolyurethane skulls. Load applied in inferior-superior directionto simulate bite forces. The load-displacement values wererecorded. Results: Significant differences were observed among thedisplacement values of five fixation systems at 120, 150, 180and 200 N of loading (p< 0.05). The highest displacementvalues were observed in the 4RLt-Micro group with theincreasing load. The 4RLt-Mini and 4LLt-Mini groups showedthe least displacement values, and the 4LLt-Mini group showedless displacement than the 4RLt-Mini group. The 2Lt/2It- Miniand 2Lt/2Ir-Mini groups showed proximate displacement valueswith the 4RLt-Mini and 4LLt-Mini groups. Conclusion: The results of this study show that the left sided Lminiplates provide more stable results than the right sidedones. Also, it may be said that while sufficient stability can beobtained, the problem of palpability is also eliminated with theuse of bioabsorbable plates in the regions with thin muscularityin combination with standard titanium miniplates. However,further in vitro and in vivo studies needs to be conducted toconfirm these results.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, poliüretan kafatası modellerinde LeFort I osteotomisi sonrası beş farklı plak-vida sisteminin stabiliteüzerindeki etkisini araştırmaktır.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Poliüretan kafataslarında deneysel olarakoluşturulan Le Fort I osteotomisinin fiksasyonu için standarttitanyum mini plaklar, titanyum mikroplaklar ve rezorbe olabilenplakalar uygulandı. Isırma kuvvetlerini simüle etmek için inferior süperior yönde kuvvet uygulandı. Kuvvet-yer değiştirme değerlerikaydedildi. Bulgular: 120, 150, 180 ve 200 N yüklemede beş farklı fiksasyonsisteminin yer değiştirme değerleri arasında önemli farklılıklargözlendi (p

🔖

Cite This Article

AY, M., AYRANCI, F., TORUL, D., ÖMEZLİ, M. M. (2022). Biomechanical Comparison of Different Fixation Systemsafter Le Fort I Advancement Osteotomy: An in Vitro Study. Selcuk Dental Journal, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 729–735. https://ajindex.com/articles/591420

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Susarla SM, Ettinger R, Preston K, Kapadia H, Egbert MA. Two-point nasomaxillary fixation of the Le Fort I osteotomy: assessment of stability at one year postoperative. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;49(4):466-470
  2. Erkmen E, Atac MS, Yucel E, Kurt A. Comparison of biomechanical behaviour of maxilla following Le Fort I osteotomy with 2- versus 4-plate fixation using 3D-FEA: part 3: inferior and anterior repositioning surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38(2):173-179
  3. Coskunses FM, Kan B, Mutlu I, Cilasun U, Celik T. Evaluation of prebent miniplates in fixation of Le Fort I advancement osteotomy with the finite element method. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43(8):1505-1510
  4. Uckan S, Veziroglu F, Soydan SS, Uckan E. Comparison of stability of resorbable and titanium fixation systems by finite element analysis after maxillary advancement surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2009;20(3):775-779
  5. Huang SF, Lo LJ, Lin CL. Biomechanical interactions of different mini-plate fixations and maxilla advancements in the Le Fort I Osteotomy: a finite element analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2016;19(16):1704-1713
  6. Araujo MM, Waite PD, Lemons JE. Strength analysis of Le Fort I osteotomy fixation: titanium versus resorbable plates. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;59(9):1034-1039; discussion 1039-1040
  7. Kim BC, Padwa BL, Park HS, Jung YS. Stability of maxillary position after Le Fort I osteotomy using self-reinforced biodegradable poly-70L/30DLlactide miniplates and screws. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69(5):1442-1446
  8. Gupta A, Singh V, Mohammad S. Bite force evaluation of mandibular fractures treated with microplates and miniplates. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70(8):1903-1908
  9. Farole A, Diecidue RJ. Microscrew and microplate systems for select osteotomies in orthognathic surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1993;75(3):276-279. 10.Pinto CM, Asprino L, de Moraes M. Chemical and structural analyses of titanium plates retrieved from patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;44(8):1005-1009. 11.Schmidt BL, Perrott DH, Mahan D, Kearns G. The removal of plates and screws after Le Fort I osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998;56(2):184-188. 12.Norholt SE, Pedersen TK, Jensen J. Le Fort I miniplate osteosynthesis: a randomized, prospective study comparing resorbable PLLA/PGA with titanium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;33(3):245-252. 13.Schortinghuis J, Bos RR, Vissink A. Complications of internal fixation of maxillofacial fractures with mi