Journals / Selcuk Dental Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Thermal TreatedNickel Titanium Single File Systems Used with ReciprocatingMotion at Body Temperature

Resiprokal Hareket İle Kullanılan Isıl İşlem Görmüş TekEğe Nikel Titanyum Sistemlerin Vücut SıcaklığındaDöngüsel Yorgunluk Dirençlerinin Karşılaştırılması

Pages
658–664
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Cyclic fatigueresistance of North Profa RC Blue group was statistically higherthan WaveOne Gold group (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: The aim of this study was to compare the phasetransformation temperatures and cyclic fatigue resistances ofWaveOne Gold, Reciproc Blue and North Profa RC Blue nickeltitanium (NiTi) instruments at body temperature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: In this study 12 WaveOne Gold, 12 Reciproc Blue and12 North Profa RC Blue rotary system NiTi files were used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Cyclic fatigueresistance of North Profa RC Blue group was statistically higherthan WaveOne Gold group (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the phasetransformation temperatures and cyclic fatigue resistances ofWaveOne Gold, Reciproc Blue and North Profa RC Blue nickeltitanium (NiTi) instruments at body temperature. Methods: In this study 12 WaveOne Gold, 12 Reciproc Blue and12 North Profa RC Blue rotary system NiTi files were used. Allinstruments were used in a static cyclic fatigue testing device,which has an artificial ceramic canal with a radius of curvature of5 mm, an angle of curvature of 60° and a 1,4 mm inner diameterat 37°C until the fracture occurred. The time to failure of the fileswas recorded using a digital chronometer and the number ofcycles to failure of files were calculated. Non-normally distributeddata were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis H test. Weibull analysis wasperformed to determine the estimated survival rate. Results: There was no statistically significant difference betweenthe North Profa RC Blue group and the Reciproc Blue group, andbetween the Reciproc Blue group and the WaveOne Gold groupin terms of cyclic fatigue resistance (p>0.05). Cyclic fatigueresistance of North Profa RC Blue group was statistically higherthan WaveOne Gold group (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı WaveOne Gold, Reciproc Blue veNorth Profa RC Blue nikel titanyum (NiTi) tek eğe dönersistemlerin vücut sıcaklığında döngüsel yorgunluğa bağlıkırılma dirençlerinin ve faz değişim derecelerininkarşılaştırılmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu çalışmada 12 WaveOne Gold, 12Reciproc Blue ve 12 North Profa RC Blue döner eğe sistem NiTieğeleri kullanıldı. Tüm eğeler, 60°’lik kurvatür açısına, 5 mmkurvatür yarıçapına ve 1.4 mm kanal iç çapına sahip seramikyapay kanal içeren statik döngüsel yorgunluk deneydüzeneğinde 37°C’de kırılıncaya kadar kullanıldı. Eğelerinkırılma zamanı dijital kronometre ile kaydedildi ve kırılıncayakadarki tur sayıları hesaplandı. Normal dağılım göstermediğisaptanan veriler Kruskal-Wallis H testi ile analiz edildi. Tahminisağlam kalma oranının belirlenmesi için Weibull analizi yapıldı. Bulgular: North Profa RC Blue grubu ile Reciproc Blue grubuarasında ve Reciproc Blue grubu ile WaveOne Gold grubuarasında döngüsel yorgunluk direnci bakımından istatistikselolarak anlamlı bir fark görülmedi (p>0.05). North Profa RC Blueeğelerin döngüsel yorgunluk direnci WaveOne Gold eğelerdenistatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede yüksek bulundu (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KESKİN, C., KELEŞ, A., BAŞ, G., YÜZGÜLEÇ, E., İNAN, U. (2022). Comparison of Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Thermal TreatedNickel Titanium Single File Systems Used with ReciprocatingMotion at Body Temperature. Selcuk Dental Journal, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 658–664. https://ajindex.com/articles/591410

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Pruett JP, Clement DJ, Carnes Jr DL. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 1997; 23: 77-85
  2. Pedullà E, Lo Savio F, Boninelli S, Plotino G, Grande N, Rapisarda E, La Rosa G. Influence of cyclic torsional preloading on cyclic fatigue resistance of nickel–titanium instruments. Int Endod J 2015; 48: 1043-50
  3. Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JE,Messer HH. Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. J Endod 2000; 26: 161-65
  4. Shen Y, Cheung GS, Bian Z, Peng B. Comparison of defects in ProFile and ProTaper systems after clinical use. J Endod 2006; 32: 61-65
  5. Cheung GS. Instrument fracture: mechanisms, removal of fragments, and clinical outcomes. Endod Topics 2009; 16: 1-26
  6. Plotino G, Grande NM, Mercade BM, Testarelli L,Gambarini G. Influence of temperature on cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Gold and ProTaper Universal rotary files. J Endod 2017; 43: 200-02
  7. Plotino G, Grande NM, Cotti E, Testarelli L,Gambarini G. Blue treatment enhances cyclic fatigue resistance of vortex nickel-titanium rotary files. J Endod 2014; 40: 1451- 53
  8. Yared G. Canal preparation using only one Ni‐Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations. Int Endod J 2008; 41: 339-44
  9. You S-Y, Bae K-S, Baek S-H, Kum K-Y, Shon W-J, Lee W. Lifespan of one nickel-titanium rotary file with reciprocating motion in curved root canals. J Endod 2010; 36: 1991-94. 10.De‐Deus G, Moreira E, Lopes H, Elias C. Extended cyclic fatigue life of F2 ProTaper instruments used in reciprocating movement. Int Endod J 2010; 43: 1063-68. 11.Pedullà E, Grande NM, Plotino G, Gambarini G, Rapisarda E. Influence of continuous or reciprocating motion on cyclic fatigue resistance of 4 different nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2013; 39: 258-61. 12.Alcalde MP, Duarte MAH, Bramante CM, de Vasconselos BC, Tanomaru-Filho M, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Pinto JC, Só MVR, Vivan RR. Cyclic fatigue and torsional strength of three different thermally treated reciprocating nickeltitanium instruments. Clin Oral Invest 2018; 22: 1865-71. 13.Van der Vyver PJ, Vorster M. WaveOne® Gold reciprocating instruments: Clinical application in the private practice: Part 1. International Dentistry-African Edition 2017; 7: 6-19. 14.Adıgüzel M, Capar ID. Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of WaveOne and WaveOne Gold small, primary, and large instruments. J Endod 2017; 43: 623- 27. 15.Al-Huwaizi H. Evaluation of the Cyclic Fatigue of Wave One Gold and Reciproc Bl