Journals / Savunma Bilimleri Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

An application of an outranking based fuzzy MCDM to the selection of sniper guns

Üstünlük esaslı bulanık çok ölçütlü karar verme yönteminin keskin nişancı tüfeği seçimi problemine uygulaması

Pages
40–54
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Using this program, which has been developed in Java, the same method can be applied to similar problems and the necessary computations can be performed more easily.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper a fuzzy MCDM based on an outranking relation, developed by Aouam et at. (2003), is applied to the problem of choosing the best sniper gun among several sniper guns considered for evaluation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:One advantage of this method is that it allows decision makers to use crisp and/or fuzzy numbers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Using this program, which has been developed in Java, the same method can be applied to similar problems and the necessary computations can be performed more easily.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this paper a fuzzy MCDM based on an outranking relation, developed by Aouam et at. (2003), is applied to the problem of choosing the best sniper gun among several sniper guns considered for evaluation. One advantage of this method is that it allows decision makers to use crisp and/or fuzzy numbers. The main objective of this study is to apply this fuzzy method to a real application and to develop a program for this goal. Using this program, which has been developed in Java, the same method can be applied to similar problems and the necessary computations can be performed more easily.

Özet

Bu çalışmada Aouam ve ark. (2003) tarafından geliştirilen üstünlük ilişkisine dayanan bulanık çok ölçüttü karar verme yöntemi keskin nişancı tüfeği seçimi problemine uygulanmıştır. Söz konusu yöntemin avantajlarından birisi hem kesin hem de bulanık ölçütlerin kullanılabilmesidir. Çalışmanın temel amacı söz konusu bulanık yöntemi gerçek bir probleme uygulamak ve bu amaç için bir program geliştirmektir. Java dilinde geliştirilen program ile hem benzer diğer problem/ere aynı yöntemin uygulanması hem de hesaplamalarda kolaylık sağlanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLAN, G., BOZKAYA, N. (2022). An application of an outranking based fuzzy MCDM to the selection of sniper guns. Savunma Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 40–54. https://ajindex.com/articles/591202

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Aouam, T., Chang, S.I., Lee, E.S., 2003. Fuzzy MADM: An outranking method. European Journal of Operational Research, 145:317-328.
  2. Bellman, R. ve Zadeh, L.A., 1970. Decision making in a fuzzy environment. Management Science, 17B(4):141 -164. Bouchon-Meunier, B., 1997. Fundamentals of Fuzzy Logic, fuzzy inference and fuzzy control, Advances in Soft-Computing Technologies and Applications in Mission Systems, Research and Technology Organization(RTO) AGARD Conference Proceedings, AGARD Lecture Series LS-210, 3. Bozkaya, N., 2004. Türk Silahlı Kuvvetlerinin Muharebe Etkinliğini Artıracak Keskin Nişancı Tüfeğinin Seçimi, (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Ankara: KHO Savunma Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Chang, P.T. ve Lee, E.S., 1994. Ranking of fuzzy sets based on the concept of existence. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 27 (9/10): 1-21.
  3. Chang, J.R., Cheng, C.H., Teng, K.H., Kuo, C.Y., 2007. Selecting weapon systems using relative distance metric method. Soft Computing, 11:573-584.
  4. Chen, S.M., 1996. Evaluating weapon systems using arithmetic operations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 77:265-276.
  5. Cheng, C.H., 1996. Evaluating naval tactical missile systems by fuzzy AHP based on the grade of membership function. European Journal of Operational Research, 96:343-350.
  6. Cheng, C.H., 1999. Evaluating weapon systems using ranking fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 107:25-35.
  7. Cheng, C.H., Yang, K.L., Hwang, C.L., 1999. Evaluating attack helicopters £y AHP based on linguistic variable weight. European Journal of Operational Research, 116:423-435.
  8. Cheng, C.H. ve Lin, Y., 2002. Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 142:174-186.
  9. Roy, B., 1977. Partial preference analysis and decision-aid: The fuzzy - outranking relation concept, kaynak: D.E. Bell, R.L. Keeney, H. Raiffa (Eds.), Conflicting Objectives and Decisions. New York: Wiley, 40-75.
  10. Siskos, J.L., Lochard, J., Lombard, J., 1984. A multi-criteria decision-making methodology under fuzziness: Application to the evaluation of radiological protection in nuclear power plants, TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences. 20:261-283.
  11. Zadeh, L.A., 1965.
  12. Fuzzy sets, Information and Control. 8:338-352.