Journals / Savunma Bilimleri Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Lojistik merkezine ait ISO/IEC 9126 yazılım ürünü kalite kriterlerinin analitik hiyerarşi yöntemi ile belirlenmesi

Determining logistics center's ISO/IEC 9126 software product quality criteria based on analytic hierarchy process

Pages
37–58
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Eventually, we proposed an equivalent model which includes modified base standards.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:ISO/IEC 9126 software product quality model points out two significant properties; first related to the user, the developer and the manager’s view for product quality and second the quality characteristics are accompanied by guidelines for their use.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We have used multicriteria decision making method called Analytic Hierarchy Process with ISO/IEC 9126 for determining logistics center’s essential and useful software product quality criteria.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Eventually, we proposed an equivalent model which includes modified base standards.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

ISO/IEC 9126 software product quality model points out two significant properties; first related to the user, the developer and the manager’s view for product quality and second the quality characteristics are accompanied by guidelines for their use. These two properties are encouragement to us as we continue to strive for better understanding of the logistics centers software product quality characteristics. In this paper, we selected software product quality characteristics that were powerful enough to capture logistics center’s software quality requirements. We have used multicriteria decision making method called Analytic Hierarchy Process with ISO/IEC 9126 for determining logistics center’s essential and useful software product quality criteria. Eventually, we proposed an equivalent model which includes modified base standards.

Özet

ISO/IEC 9126 yazılım kalite modeli iki önemli özelliğini işaret eder. Birincisi; kullanıcı, geliştiren ve yöneticinin ürün kalitesine ait görüşü; ikincisi kullanım kılavuzlarında yer alan kalite karakteristikleri ile ilgilidir. Bu iki özellik, bizi lojistik merkezi yazılım kalite karakteristiklerinin daha iyi anlaşılması konusunda çalışmak için cesaret veren unsurlardı. Biz bu çalışmada, lojistik merkezi yazılım kalite gereksinimlerini karşılamada yeterince güçlü olan yazılım ürün kalite karakteristiklerini seçtik. Lojistik merkezinin zorunlu ve kullanışlı yazılım ürün kalite kriterlerini belirlemek için ISO/IEC 9126 ile çok kriterli karar verme yöntemlerinden Analitik Hiyerarşi Yöntemini kullandık. Sonuç olarak, geliştirilmiş alt standartları içeren bir başka bir model önerdik.

🔖

Cite This Article

KABAK, M., KAZANÇOĞLU, Y., KURTEL, K. (2022). Lojistik merkezine ait ISO/IEC 9126 yazılım ürünü kalite kriterlerinin analitik hiyerarşi yöntemi ile belirlenmesi. Savunma Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 37–58. https://ajindex.com/articles/591185

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Arbel, A., Orgler, Y.E., 1990. "An Application of the AHP to Bank Strategic Planning: The Mergers and Acquisitions Process", European Journal of 13 Operational Research, Amsterdam: Sep 5,Vol. 48, Iss. 1; p. 27. Ayyıldız, G., 2003,CIM Yatırımlarının Bulanık AHP Yöntemi ile ıs Değerlendirilmesi, İTU Endüstri Müh. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul.
  2. Büyüközkan, G., Kahraman, C., Ruan, D., 2004. "A fuzzy multi-criteria 13, decision approach for software development strategy selection." International Journal of General Systems, Apr-Jun.2004, Vol. 33 Issue 2/3, p.259-280.
  3. Chan, A.H.S., Kwok, W. Y, Duffy, V.G. 2004. "Using AHP for determining priority in a safety management system", Industrial Management + Data Systems, Wembley: Vol. 104, Iss. 5/6; p. 430. Cheng, Ching-Hsue, Yang, Kuo-Lung, Hwang, Chia-Lung, 1999. "Evaluating Attack Helicopters By AHP Based On Linguistic Variable Weight" European Journal of Operational Research, Amsterdam: Jul 16 I999. Vol. 116, Iss. 2; p.423. Cook, D.R., Staschak, S., Green, W.T., 1990. "Equitable Allocation of Livers for Orthotopic Transplantation: An Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process", European Journal of Operational Research, Amsterdam: Sep 5, 1990. Vol. 48, Iss. 1; p. 49. Dağdeviren, M., Eren, T. 2001. "Tedarikçi Firma Seçiminde Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi ve 0-1 Hedef Programlama Yöntemlerinin Kullanılması" Gazi Üniv. Müh. Mim. Fak. Der., (16), 2, p.41-52.
  4. Dyer, R.F., Forman, E.H., Mustafa, M.A., 1992. "Decision Support for Media Selection Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process", Journal of Advertising, Armonk: Mar 1992. Vol. 21, Iss. 1; p.59. Ebert C., Dumke R., Bundschuh M., Schmietendorf, A., 2005. Best Practices in Software Measurement, Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Fenton N.E., and Pfleeger S.L., 1997. Software metrics: A Rigorous and Practical Approach, 2nd edition, PWS Publishing Company. Frazelle E.H., 2002.
  5. Supply Chain Strategy, McGraw-Hill. Hull E., Jackson K., and Dick J., 2005. Requirements Engineering, 2nd edition, Springer. IEEE, 1990. IEEE Std. 610.12-1990-IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology, Approved edition, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York. IEEE, 1998. IEEE Std. 830-1998-IEEE Recommended Practice for Software Requirements Specifications, Approved edition, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York. IEEE, 2004. IEEE Std., 1012-2004-IEEE Standard for Software Verification and Validation, Approved edition, The Institute of Electrical a