SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sanat & Tasarım Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

COLLABORATION AND SELF-EXPLOITATION IN THE SHARED DISCOURSE OF PROFESSION AMONG INDUSTRIAL DESIGN STUDENTS

ENDÜSTRIYEL TASARIM ÖĞRENCILERI ARASINDA PAYLAŞILAN MESLEK SÖYLEMINDE BIRLIKTE ÇALIŞMA VE ÖZSÖMÜRÜ

Pınar KAYGAN
Pages
2–19
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Drawing on the implications of this anticipation, the article showshow the enthusiasm for collaboration can lead to a blurring of the boundaries between workand social life, by inviting pleasurable work, yet normalising poor work/life balance of designerssimultaneously.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The article explores 91 senior industrial design students’ expectations and dreams regardingcollaborative work relations and environments in design offices.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The shared discourse amongstudents reveals the anticipation of an unconventional work culture based on working collectively,which is depicted as egalitarian, informal, relaxed and pleasurable as opposed to the formal,hierarchical and therefore unfavourable environments and relations perceived to be prevalentin traditional organisations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Drawing on the implications of this anticipation, the article showshow the enthusiasm for collaboration can lead to a blurring of the boundaries between workand social life, by inviting pleasurable work, yet normalising poor work/life balance of designerssimultaneously.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The article explores 91 senior industrial design students’ expectations and dreams regardingcollaborative work relations and environments in design offices. The shared discourse amongstudents reveals the anticipation of an unconventional work culture based on working collectively,which is depicted as egalitarian, informal, relaxed and pleasurable as opposed to the formal,hierarchical and therefore unfavourable environments and relations perceived to be prevalentin traditional organisations. Drawing on the implications of this anticipation, the article showshow the enthusiasm for collaboration can lead to a blurring of the boundaries between workand social life, by inviting pleasurable work, yet normalising poor work/life balance of designerssimultaneously.

Özet

Bu makale, 91 üçüncü ve dördüncü sınıf endüstriyel tasarım öğrencisinin tasarım ofislerindeki işbirlikçi çalışma ilişkilerine ve ortamına dair beklentileri ve hayallerini incelemektedir. Öğrenciler arasında paylaşılan söylemde, geleneksel kurumlarda yaygın olduğu düşünülen resmi, hiyerarşik ve sonuç olarak olumsuz olarak nitelendirilen ortam ve ilişkilere kıyasla; birlikte çalışmaya dayalı eşitlikçi, gayrı resmi, rahat ve keyif veren diye betimlenen geleneksel olmayan bir çalışma kültürü beklentisi ortaya çıkmaktadır. Bu beklentiyi derinlemesine analiz ederek bu makale, işbirliğine yönelik hevesin nasıl iş ve sosyal yaşam arasındaki sınırların belirsizleşmesine yol açabileceğini, keyif veren çalışma koşulları sunarken, aynı anda iş ve özel yaşam dengesinin zayıflamasını normalleştirdiğini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYGAN, P. (2022). COLLABORATION AND SELF-EXPLOITATION IN THE SHARED DISCOURSE OF PROFESSION AMONG INDUSTRIAL DESIGN STUDENTS. Sanat & Tasarım Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 2–19. https://ajindex.com/articles/590977

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Acker, J. (2006). “Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations.” Gender & Society, 20, 441 – 464. Allen, K., Quinn, J., Hollingworth, S., & Rose, A. (2013). “Becoming employable students and ‘ideal’ creative workers: exclusion and inequality in higher education work placements.” British Journal of Sociology of Education, 34, 431-452.
  2. Banks, M., & Hesmondhalgh, D. (2009). “Looking for work in creative industries policy.” International Journal of Cultural Policy, 15, 415-430.
  3. Banks, M., & Milestone, K. (2011). “Individualization, gender and cultural work.” Gender, Work and Organization, 18, 73-89.
  4. Barrett, F. J. (2002). “Gender strategies of women professionals: The case of the US navy.” In M. Dent & S. Whitehead (Eds.), Managing professional identities: Knowledge, performativity and the “new” professional (pp. 157-173). London and New York: Routledge. Bird, S. R. (2003). “Sex composition, masculinity stereotype dissimilarity and the quality of men’s workplace social relations.” Gender, Work and Organization, 10, 579-604.
  5. Björklund, T. A. (2010). “Enhancing creative knowledge-work: challenges and points of leverage.” International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 3, 517-525.
  6. Buchanan, D. (2000). “An eager and enduring embrace: The ongoing recovery of a management idea.” In S. Procter & F. Mueller (Eds.), Teamworking (pp. 25-42).
  7. London, UK: Macmillan. Busseri, M. A., & Palmer, J. M. (2000). “Improving teamwork: the effect of self-assessment on construction design teams.” Design Studies, 21, 223–238.
  8. Chung, W., & Wang, C. (2004). “Knowledge-based design and decisions: accommodating multidisciplined product development teams.” The Design Journal: An International Journal for All Aspects of Design, 7, 16-26.
  9. Collinson, D. L., & Hearn, J. (1994). “Naming men as men: implications for work, organization and management.” Gender, Work and Organization, 1, 2-22.
  10. Cross, N. (1995). “Observations of teamwork and social processes in design.” Design Studies, 16, 143-170.
  11. Dellinger, K. (2002). “Wearing gender and sexuality ‘on your sleeve’: dress norms and the importance of occupational and organizational culture at work.” Gender Issues, 20, 3-25.
  12. Devine, D. J., Clayton, L. D., Philips, J. L., Dunford, B. B., & Melner, S. B. (1999). “Teams in organizations: prevalence, characteristics, and effectiveness.” Small Group Research, 30, 678-711.
  13. Diefenbach, T., & Sillince, J. A. A. (2011). “Formal and informal hierarchy in different types of organizati