SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sakarya University Journal of Education / 2019 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

An Investigation of Pre-Service and In-Service Teachers’ Perceptions of Teacher Quality in Turkey

Görsev SÖNMEZ BORAN
Nuri Can AKSOY
Burcu GÜRKAN
Pages
537–549
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Present study alsosuggested both academic and practical implications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Present study investigates the senior-level Turkish pre-service and inserviceteachers’ perceptions of teacher quality with a descriptive survey method.Data for this study were gathered through Teacher Quality Survey (TQS) and openendedquestions from 210 pre-service teachers enrolled in four differentuniversities in Turkey and 147 in-service teachers from different majors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results ofthe study showed that both pre-service and in-service teachers think that teachers’relationship with the students affect students’ success and teachers should take theindividual differences into consideration.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Present study alsosuggested both academic and practical implications.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Present study investigates the senior-level Turkish pre-service and inserviceteachers’ perceptions of teacher quality with a descriptive survey method.Data for this study were gathered through Teacher Quality Survey (TQS) and openendedquestions from 210 pre-service teachers enrolled in four differentuniversities in Turkey and 147 in-service teachers from different majors. Results ofthe study showed that both pre-service and in-service teachers think that teachers’relationship with the students affect students’ success and teachers should take theindividual differences into consideration. Moreover, according to the pre-serviceteachers, teachers should know how to teach and assess what they teach, and theyneed to know time management. On the other hand, in-service teachers considerthat teachers should follow current developments, should have the researcheridentity and should understand students’ needs and interests. Present study alsosuggested both academic and practical implications.

🔖

Cite This Article

BORAN, G. S., AKSOY, N. C., GÜRKAN, B. (2022). An Investigation of Pre-Service and In-Service Teachers’ Perceptions of Teacher Quality in Turkey. Sakarya University Journal of Education, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 537–549. https://ajindex.com/articles/590529

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Akyüz, Y. (2009).
  2. Türk Eğitim Tarihi. Pegem Akademi, Ankara.
  3. Ata, B. (1924). Türk basını ışığında Amerikalı eğitimci John Dewey’nin Türkiye seyahati. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(3), 193-207.
  4. Bozdoğan, A. E., Aydın, D., & Yıldırım, K. (2007). Öğretmen adaylarının öğretmenlik mesleğine ilişkin tutumları. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(2), 209-222.
  5. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri (Geliştirilmiş 2. baskı). Ankara:
  6. Pegem A Yayıncılık. Cresswell. J. (2002). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods Approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of State policy evidence. Journal of Education Policy Analysis, 8(1), 114-120.
  7. Duck, L. (2000).
  8. The ongoing professional journey, Educational Leadership, 57(8), 43-45.
  9. Eby, J. (1994). Reflective planning, teaching and evaluation: K-12. New York: Merrill. Freeman, D., & Richards, J. C. (1993). Conceptions of teaching and the education of second language teachers. Tesol Quarterly, 27(2), 193-216.
  10. Goldhaber, D. & Brewer, D. (2000). Does teacher certification matter? High school Teacher certification status and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(2),129-146.
  11. Hanushek, E. (1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 100(1), 84-117.
  12. Hanushek, E. A. & Rivkin, S. G. (2007). Pay, working conditions and Teacher quality, Future of Children, 17(1), 69-86.
  13. Harris, D. N., & Sass, T. R. (2010). Teacher training, teacher quality and student achievement. Journal of public economics, 95(7-8), 798-812.
  14. Karasar, N. (2006). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi. Ankara:
  15. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım. Mincu, M. E. (2015). Teacher quality and school improvement: what is the role of research?. Oxford Review of Education, 41(2), 253-269.
  16. Okpala, C. O., & Ellis, R. (2000). The perceptions of college students on teacher quality: A Focus on teacher qualifications. Education, 126(2), 374-383.
  17. Ornstein, A. C., & Levine, D. U. (2003). Foundations of education (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. Özbek, R., Kahyaoğlu, M., & Özgen, N. (2007). Evaluation of candidate teachers’ opinions on teaching profession. Afyon Kocatepe University Journal of Social Sciences, 9(2), 221-232.
  18. Sabers, D., Selby, L., & Nolan, P. (1995). Computers e