SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sakarya University Journal of Education / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

The Relationship Between Prosocial and Antisocial Behaviors and Personality Traits in Team Athletes*

Zeynep AKKUŞ ÇUTUK
Zülbiye KAÇAY
Selman ÇUTUK
Pages
182–194
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was no statistically significant relationship between the subdimensions of extraversion and openness.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to investigate the relationships betweenpersonality traits and prosocial and antisocial behaviors displayed in team athletes.In this respect, the data was collected from a total of 445 (61 females and 384males) participants engaged in team sports.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result of the analysis it was determined that therewas a positive and a significant relationship between prosocial behavior-team (PT),prosocial behavior-opponent (PO) and extroversion, responsibility and opennesssub-dimensions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was no statistically significant relationship between the subdimensions of extraversion and openness.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationships betweenpersonality traits and prosocial and antisocial behaviors displayed in team athletes.In this respect, the data was collected from a total of 445 (61 females and 384males) participants engaged in team sports. The relational screening model wasused in the study. The Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior in Sports Scale, Five FactorPersonality Inventory and Personal Information Form prepared by the researcherwere used to collect data. Descriptive statistics, and Pearson Correlation Coefficientwere used in the analysis. As a result of the analysis it was determined that therewas a positive and a significant relationship between prosocial behavior-team (PT),prosocial behavior-opponent (PO) and extroversion, responsibility and opennesssub-dimensions. However, significant negative difference was determined betweenprosocial behavior-team, prosocial behavior-opponent (PO) and neuroticism.Accordingly, as prosocial behaviors of team athletes increase, the neuroticism levelof the athletes decreases. A negative significant relationship was determinedbetween the scores obtained from the antisocial behavior-team (AT) and antisocialbehavior-opponent (AO) and the sub-dimensions of consistency and responsibility.There was a significant positive correlation between the neuroticism subdimension. There was no statistically significant relationship between the subdimensions of extraversion and openness.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇUTUK, Z. A., KAÇAY, Z., ÇUTUK, S. (2022). The Relationship Between Prosocial and Antisocial Behaviors and Personality Traits in Team Athletes*. Sakarya University Journal of Education, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 182–194. https://ajindex.com/articles/590492

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Aktaş, V., & Güvenç, G. B. (2006). Kız ve erkek ergenlerde saldırgan ve olumlu sosyal davranışlar ile yaş, ilişkisel bağlam ve kişiler arası duyarlılık arasındaki ilişkiler [Relationships between aggressive and positive social behaviors and age, relational context, and interpersonal sensitivity in male and female adolescents]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(2), 233-264.
  2. Ariely, D., Bracha, A., & Meier, S. (2009). Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. The American Economic Review, 99(1), 544- 555. Balcikanli, G.S. (2013). The Turkish Adaptation of the Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior in Sport Scale (PABSS). International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(18), 271-276.
  3. Basım, H.N, Çetin, F., & Tabak, A. (2009). Beş faktör kişilik özelliklerinin kişilerarası çatışma çözme yaklaşımlarıyla ilişkisi [The relationship between five factor personality traits and interpersonal conflict resolution approaches]. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 24(63), 20-34.
  4. Başer, E. (1986). Uygulamalı spor psikolojisi [Applied sports psychology]. Ankara:
  5. B.T.G.M. Yayınları.
  6. Baumeister, R.F., & Bushman, B.J. (2007). Social psychology and human nature. Cengage Learning. p. 254. ISBN 9780495116332. Benet-Martinez, V., & John, O. P. (1998). Los cinco grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait multimethod analyses of the big five in Spanish and English. American Psychological Association, 75(3), 729–750.
  7. Carlo, G., Hausmann, A., Christiansen, S., & Randall, B. A. (2003). Sociocognitive and behavioral correlates of a measure of prosocial tendencies for adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 23(1), 107–134.
  8. Clarke, J. (2004). The sociology of childhood. In D. Wyse (Ed.), Childhood studies and introduction. Chapter 12. USA: Blackwell Publishing LTD Council of Europe. Demirel, H., & Buğdaycı, S. (2019). Spor yapan ve yapmayan üniversite öğrencilerinin olumlu sosyal davranış eğilimlerinin incelenmesi [Examining the positive social behavior tendencies of university students who do sports and those who do not]. Türk Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(1), 55-59.
  9. Dervent, F. (2007). Lise öğrencilerinin saldırganlık düzeyleri ve sportif aktivitelere katılma ilişkisi [The aggression levels of high school students and their relationship to participating in sports activities] (Masters’ Thesis). Gazi Üniversitesi,
  10. Ankara.
  11. Dorak, F., & Vurgun, N. (2006). Takım sporları açısından empati ve takım birlikteliği ilişkis