SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sakarya Tıp Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of Effects of Three Distinct Stress Models on Anxiety- and Depression-Related Behaviors in Female Rats

Dişi Sıçanlarda Üç Farklı Stres Modelinin Anksiyete ve Depresyon Benzeri Davranışlara Etkilerinin Karşılaştırılması

Selim Kutlu
Zafer Sahin
Aynur Koc
Raviye Ozen Koca
Alpaslan Ozkurkculer
Pinar Cakan
Z. Isik Solak Gormus
Pages
131–140
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Anxiety and depression tests were repeated after a 10-day rest period.Results In the open field test, a percentage of time spent in the central area was lower in the immobilization stress-2 and social isolation (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of three distinct stress protocols on anxiety/depression-related behaviors in adult female rats.( Sakarya Med J 2019, 9(1):131-140 )Materialsand MethodsAdult Wistar rats were randomly divided into four groups (n=8/ group) as control, immobilization stress-1 (daily 45 minutes) immobilization stress-2 (daily twice 45minutes) and social isolation (rats were housed in a metabolic cage).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Stress protocols were performed for a period of 10 days.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Anxiety and depression tests were repeated after a 10-day rest period.Results In the open field test, a percentage of time spent in the central area was lower in the immobilization stress-2 and social isolation (p
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of three distinct stress protocols on anxiety/depression-related behaviors in adult female rats.( Sakarya Med J 2019, 9(1):131-140 )Materialsand MethodsAdult Wistar rats were randomly divided into four groups (n=8/ group) as control, immobilization stress-1 (daily 45 minutes) immobilization stress-2 (daily twice 45minutes) and social isolation (rats were housed in a metabolic cage). Stress protocols were performed for a period of 10 days. When the animals were in diestrus, anxiety anddepression-like behaviors were evaluated by the open field test and forced swimming test, respectively. Anxiety and depression tests were repeated after a 10-day rest period.Results In the open field test, a percentage of time spent in the central area was lower in the immobilization stress-2 and social isolation (p

Özet

Amaç Mevcut çalışmada yetişkin dişi sıçanlarda üç farklı stres protokolünün anksiyete/depresyon benzeri davranışlara etkisinin kıyaslanması amaçlanmıştır. ( Sakarya Tıp Dergisi 2019, 9(1):131-140 ). Gereç ve Yöntemler Yetişkin Wistar sıçanlar kontrol, immobilizasyon stresi-1 (günlük 45 dakika) immobilizasyon stresi-2 (günlük iki kez 45 dakika) ve sosyal izolasyon (metabolik kafeste) olarak rastgele dört gruba ayrıldı (n=8/grup). Stres protokolleri 10 gün boyunca uygulandı ve anksiyete ve depresyonla ilişkili davranışlar, hayvanlar diöstrüs dönemindeyken, açık alan ve zorunlu yüzme testi ile değerlendirildi. Anksiyete ve depresyon testleri 10 günlük dinlenme süresinden sonra tekrarlandı. Bulgular Açık alan testinde, merkez alanda geçirilen zaman immobilizasyon stresi-2 ve sosyal izolasyon gruplarında azaldı (p

🔖

Cite This Article

Kutlu, S., Sahin, Z., Koc, A., Koca, R. O., Ozkurkculer, A., Cakan, P., Gormus, Z. I. S. (2022). Comparison of Effects of Three Distinct Stress Models on Anxiety- and Depression-Related Behaviors in Female Rats. Sakarya Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 131–140. https://ajindex.com/articles/590437

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Schneiderman N, Ironson G, Siegel SD. Stress and health: psychological, behavioral, and biological determinants. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2005; 1:607-28
  2. Kvetnansky R, Jelokova J, Rusnak M, Dronjak S, Serova B, Nankova B, et al. Novel stressors exaggerate tyrosine hydroxylase gene expression in the adrenal medulla of rats exposed to long-term cold stress, in: R. Kvetnansky (Ed.) Stress: Neural, Endocrine and Molecular studies, Taylor and Francis, London, Edition 1, 2002; 121-128
  3. Pacak K, Kvetnansky R, Palkovits M, Fukuhara K, Yadid G, Kopin IJ, et al. Adrenalectomy augments In-vivo release of norepinephrine in the paraventricular nucleus during immobilization stress. Endocrinology 1993; 133:1404-1410
  4. Venihaki M, Gravanis A, Margioris AN. Comparative study between normal rat chroma in and PC12 rat pheochromocytoma cells: Production and e ects of Corticotropin Releasing Hormone (CRH). Endocrinology 1997; 138:698-704
  5. Anisman H, Matheson K. Stress, depression, and anhedonia: Caveats concerning animal models. Neuroscience Biobehavioral Reviews 2005; 29:525-546
  6. McEwen BS. Understanding the potency of stressful early life experiences on brain and body function. Metabolism 2008; 57:11-15
  7. Depression and Other Common Mental Disorders: Global Health Estimates. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.p:8-12
  8. Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Gobal mortality, disability and the contribution of risk factors: global burden of disease study. Lancet 1997; 349:1436-42
  9. Palanza P. Animal models of anxiety and depression: how are females different? Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2001; 25:219-33
  10. Leuner B, Mendolia-Loffredo S, Shors TJ. Males and females respond differently to controllability and antidepressant treatment. Biol Psychiatry 2004; 56(12):964-70
  11. Altemus M, Sarvaiya N, Neill Epperson C. Sex di erences in anxiety and depression clinical perspectives. Front Neuroendocrinol 2014; 35:320-30
  12. Stepanichev M, Dygalo NN, Grigoryan G, Shishkina GT, Gulyaeva N. Rodent models of depression: neurotrophic and neuroinflammatory biomarkers. Biomed Res Int 2014; 2014:932757
  13. Krishnan V, Nestler EJ. Animal models of depression: molecular perspectives. Curr Top Behav Neurosci 2011; 7:121-47
  14. Jaggi AS, Bhatia N, Kumar N, Singh N, Anand P, Dhawan R. A review on animal models for screening potential anti-stress agents. Neurol Sci 2011; 32:993-1005
  15. Kvetnansky R, Mikulaj L. Adrenal and urinary catecholamines in rats during ada