SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Politeknik Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 4

Kinetic Studies of Biogas Generation Using Chicken Manure as Feedstock

Tavuk Gübresi Kullanılarak Biyogaz Üretiminde Kinetik Çalışmalar

Ayşe Hilal ULUKARDEŞLER
Ferhan Sami ATALAY
Pages
913–917
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Experiments were operated under mesophilic conditions in laboratory type glass fermenters each having a volume of ten liters.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The gas generated by anaerobic fermentation of organic wastes is called biogas.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study demonstrates the kinetic study to find out the best microbial kinetics which will be necessary for the design of an anaerobic fermenter.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Experiments were operated under mesophilic conditions in laboratory type glass fermenters each having a volume of ten liters.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The gas generated by anaerobic fermentation of organic wastes is called biogas. Since it contains methane, it can be burnt and so it can be used as an alternative energy source. The production of biogas is an anaerobic treatment process, it is important to understand the basic biochemistry and microbiology of anaerobic systems. This study demonstrates the kinetic study to find out the best microbial kinetics which will be necessary for the design of an anaerobic fermenter. For this purpose, chicken manure and chicken manure with inoculation culture were used. Experiments were operated under mesophilic conditions in laboratory type glass fermenters each having a volume of ten liters.

Özet

Organik atıkların anaerobik fermentasyonu ile oluşan gaza biyogaz denir. Biyogaz, metan içerdiğinden yanabilir ve alternatif bir enerji kaynağı olarak kullanılabilir. Biyogaz üretimi bir anaerobik arıtma sürecidir, anaerobik sistemlerin temel biyokimyasını ve mikrobiyolojisini anlamak önemlidir. Bu çalışma bir anaerobik fermentörün tasarımı için gerekli olan en iyi mikrobiyal kinetiği bulmak için kinetik çalışmayı göstermektedir. Bu amaçla, aşı kültürü ile tavuk gübresi ve tavuk gübresi kullanılmıştır. Deneyler, her biri on litre hacimli laboratuvar tipi cam fermenterlerde mezofilik koşullar altında çalıştırılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ULUKARDEŞLER, A. H., ATALAY, F. S. (2022). Kinetic Studies of Biogas Generation Using Chicken Manure as Feedstock. Politeknik Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 4, 913–917. https://ajindex.com/articles/588477

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Chang, I.S., Zhao, J., Yin, X., Wu, J., Jia, Z. and Wang., L., “Comprehensive utilizations of biogas in Inner Mongolia”, Renew. and Sust. Energy Rev., 15: 1442-1453, (2011).
  2. Yadvika, Santosh, Sreekrishnan, T.R., Kohli, S. and Rana, V., “Enhancement of biogas production from solid substrates using different techniques-a review”, Bioresour. Technol., 95: 1-10, (2004).
  3. Makaruk, A., Miltner, M. and Harasek., M., “Membrane biogas upgrading processes for the production of natural gas”, Sep. Pur. Tech., 74: 83- 92, (2010).
  4. Rasi, S., Veijanen, A. and Rintala., J., “Trace compounds of biogas from different biogas production plants”, Energy, 32: 1375-1380, (2007).
  5. Wang, X., Yang, G., Feng, Y., Ren, G. andHan, X., “Optimizing feeding composition and carbon– nitrogen ratios for improved methane yield during anaerobic co-digestion of dairy, chicken manure and wheat straw”, Bioresour. Technol., 120: 78-83, (2012).
  6. White, A.J., Kirk, D.W. and Graydon, J.W., “Analysis of small-scale biogas utilization systems on Ontario cattle farms”, Renew. Energy., 36: 1019-1025, (2011).
  7. Fezzani, B. and Cheikh, R.B., “Two-phase anaerobic co-digestion of olive mill wastes in semi- continuous digesters at mesophilic temperature”, Bioresour. Technol., 101(6): 1628-1634, (2010).
  8. Kim, J.K., Oh, B.R., Chun, Y.N. and Kim, S.W., “Effects of temperature and hydraulic retention time on anaerobic digestion of food waste”, J. Biosci. Bioeng., 102(4): 328-332, (2006).
  9. Kythreotou, N., Florides, G. and Tassou, S.A., “A review of simple to scientific models for anaerobic digestion”, Renew. Energy, 71: 701-714, (2014).
  10. Markowski, M., Bialobrzewski, I., Zielinski, M., Debowski, M. and Krzemieniewski, M., “Optimizing low-temperature biogas production from biomass by anaerobic digestion”, Renew. Energy, 69: 219-225, (2014).
  11. Biswas, J., Chowdhury, R. and Bhattacharya, P., “Kinetic studies of biogas generation using municipal waste as feed stock”, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 38: 493-503, (2006).
  12. Yusuf, M.O.L. and Ify, N.L., “The effect of waste paper on the kinetics of biogas yield from the co- digestion of cow dung and water hyacinth”, Biomass Bioenergy., 35: 1345-1351, (2011).
  13. Abdullahi, I., Ismail, A., Musa, A. O. and Galadima, A., “Effect of kinetic parameters on biogas production from local substrate using a batch feeding digester”, Eur. J. Sci. Res., 57(4): 626-634, (2011).
  14. Syaichurrozi, I., “Biogas production from co- digestion salvinia molesta and rice straw and kinetics”, Renew. Energy., 115: 76-86, (