SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Perinatal journal (Online) / 2022 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

First trimester examination of fetal anatomy: clinical practice guideline by the World Association of Perinatal Medicine (WAPM) and the Perinatal Medicine Foundation (PMF)

Erasmo HUERTAS
Themistoklis DAGKLİS
Petya CHAVEEVA
Şifa TURAN
Daniel ROLNİK
Mar M. GİL
Jader CRUZ
Ana Daneva MARKOVA
Asma KHALİL
Przemyslaw KOSİNSKİ
Nicola VOLPE
Ritsuko K. POOH
Francesco D’ANTONİO
Cihat ŞEN
Valentina De ROBERTİS
Paolo VOLPE
Waldo SEPULVEDA
Jesus Rodriquez CALVO
Pages
87–102
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim is to present a document that includes statements and recommendations on the standard evaluation of the fetal anatomy in the first trimester, based on quality evidence in the peer-reviewed literature as well as the experience of perinatal experts around the world.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This recommendation document follows the mission of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine (WAPM) in collaboration with the Perinatal Medicine Foundation (PMF).
📊
Key Findings & Data:We aim to bring together groups and individuals throughout the world for precise standardization to implement the ultrasound evaluation of the fetus in the first trimester of pregnancy and improve the early detection of anomalies and the clinical management of the pregnancy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim is to present a document that includes statements and recommendations on the standard evaluation of the fetal anatomy in the first trimester, based on quality evidence in the peer-reviewed literature as well as the experience of perinatal experts around the world.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This recommendation document follows the mission of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine (WAPM) in collaboration with the Perinatal Medicine Foundation (PMF). We aim to bring together groups and individuals throughout the world for precise standardization to implement the ultrasound evaluation of the fetus in the first trimester of pregnancy and improve the early detection of anomalies and the clinical management of the pregnancy. The aim is to present a document that includes statements and recommendations on the standard evaluation of the fetal anatomy in the first trimester, based on quality evidence in the peer-reviewed literature as well as the experience of perinatal experts around the world.

🔖

Cite This Article

HUERTAS, E., DAGKLİS, T., CHAVEEVA, P., TURAN, Ş., ROLNİK, D., GİL, M. M., CRUZ, J., MARKOVA, A. D., KHALİL, A., KOSİNSKİ, P., VOLPE, N., POOH, R. K., D’ANTONİO, F., ŞEN, C., ROBERTİS, V. D., VOLPE, P., SEPULVEDA, W., CALVO, J. R. (2022). First trimester examination of fetal anatomy: clinical practice guideline by the World Association of Perinatal Medicine (WAPM) and the Perinatal Medicine Foundation (PMF). Perinatal journal (Online), Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 87–102. https://ajindex.com/articles/588301

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Nicolaides KH. Screening for fetal aneuploidies at 11 to 13 weeks. Prenat Diagn 2011
  2. 7–15. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 2. Pandya PP, Altman DG, Brizot ML, Pettersen H, Nicolaides KH. Repeatability of measurement of fetal nuchal translucency thickness. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995
  3. 334–7. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 3. Santorum M, Wright D, Syngelaki A, Karagioti N, Nicolaides KH. Accuracy of first-trimester combined test in screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017
  4. 714–20. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 4. Souka AP, von Kaisenberg CS, Hyett JA, Sonek JD, Nicolaides KH. Increased nuchal translucency with normal karyotype. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005
  5. 1005–21. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 5. Syngelaki A, Hammami A, Bower S, Zidere V, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH. Diagnosis of fetal non-chromosomal abnormalities on routine ultrasound examination at 11–13 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019
  6. 468–76. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 6. Clur SA, Ottenkamp J, Bilardo CM. The nuchal translucency and the fetal heart: a literature review. Prenat Diagn 2009
  7. 739–48. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 7. Atzei A, Gajewska K, Huggon IC, Allan L, Nicolaides KH. Relationship between nuchal translucency thickness and prevalence of major cardiac defects in fetuses with normal karyotype. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005
  8. 154–7. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 8. Volpe P, Ubaldo P, Volpe N, Campobasso G, de Robertis V, Tempesta A, et al. Fetal cardiac evaluation at 11–14 weeks by experienced obstetricians in a low-risk population. Prenat Diagn 2011
  9. 1054–61. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 9. Vayna AM, Veduta A, Duta S, Panaitescu AM, Stoica S, Buinoiu N, et al. Diagnosis of fetal structural anomalies at 11 to 14 weeks. J Ultrasound Med 2018
  10. 2063–73. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 10. Bardi F, Smith E, Kuilman M, Snijders RJM, Bilardo CM. Early detection of structural anomalies in a primary care setting in the Netherlands. Fetal Diagn Ther 2019
  11. 12–9. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 11. Rayburn WF, Jolley JA, Simpson LL. Advances in ultrasound imaging for congenital malformations during early gestation. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2015
  12. 260–8. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 12. Rossi AC, Prefumo F. Accuracy of ultrasonography at 11–14 weeks of gestation for detection of fetal structural anomalies: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2013
  13. 1160–7. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 13. Grande M, Arigita M, Borobio V, Jimenez JM, Fernandez S, Borrell A. First-trimester detection of structural abnormalities and the role of aneuploidy m