Journals / Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4

Development and implementation of mathematics attitudes scale for the primary and secondary students

Pages
177–184
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, as a result of the application of the instrument, it was concluded that the mathematics attitudes of the students did not differ according to gender, but there was a significant difference in terms of grade level.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was aimed to develop an instrument to measure primary and secondary school students' attitudes toward mathematics and to find the underlying dimensions that comprise the attitudes toward mathematics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, a five-point Likert-type instrument consisting of 27 items to measure students' attitudes towards mathematics was prepared and applied.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, as a result of the application of the instrument, it was concluded that the mathematics attitudes of the students did not differ according to gender, but there was a significant difference in terms of grade level.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study was aimed to develop an instrument to measure primary and secondary school students' attitudes toward mathematics and to find the underlying dimensions that comprise the attitudes toward mathematics. In addition, it was aimed to examine students' attitudes towards mathematics in terms of gender and grade level variables. For this purpose, a five-point Likert-type instrument consisting of 27 items to measure students' attitudes towards mathematics was prepared and applied. The validity and reliability of the instrument were made on the data obtained from 328 students selected by random sampling method among primary and secondary school students. As a result of the factor analysis performed to determine the construct validity of the instrument, it was seen that the factor loads of the scale items ranged from 0.44 to 0.75, the Kaiser-Meyer Olkin (KMO) value was .89, and the internal consistency coefficient (Cronbach alpha) value calculated for the reliability study was α=.88. In addition, principal components factor analysis with varimax (orthogonal) rotation applied to find the sub-dimensions of the instrument revealed five factors: (1) in-class; (2) the nature of mathematics; (3) problem solving; (4) understanding and (5) self-efficacy. Findings related to validity and reliability studies show that the instrument has a valid and reliable structure. In addition, as a result of the application of the instrument, it was concluded that the mathematics attitudes of the students did not differ according to gender, but there was a significant difference in terms of grade level.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLBURNU, M., YILDIRIM, K. (2022). Development and implementation of mathematics attitudes scale for the primary and secondary students. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 4, 177–184. https://ajindex.com/articles/587921

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Aiken, L. R. (1974). Two scale of attitude toward mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 5, 67-71.
  2. Altun, M. (1995). İlkokul 3, 4 ve 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin problem çözme davranışları üzerine bir çalışma. Unpublished doctorate dissertation, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  3. Baloğlu, M. & Koçak, R. (2006). A multivariate investigation of the differences in mathematics anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 40 (7), 1325–1335.
  4. Başer, N. & Yavuz, G. (2003). Öğretmen adaylarının matematik dersine yönelik tutumları. Retrieved July 29, 2021, from http:// www.matder.org.tr/ogretmen-adaylarinin-matematik-dersine- yonelik-tutumlari/ Baykul, Y. (1990). İlkokul beşinci sınıftan lise ve dengi okulların son sınıflarına kadar matematik ve fen derslerine karşı tutumda görülen değişmeler ve öğrenci seçme sınavındaki başarı ile ilişkili olduğu düşünülen bazı faktörler. Ankara:
  5. ÖSYM Yayınları.
  6. Blatchford, P. (1996). Pupils’ views on school work and school from 7 to 16 years. Research Papers in Education, 11 (3), 263–288.
  7. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2005). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara:
  8. Pegema Yayıncılık. Çoban, A. (1989). Ankara, merkez ortaokullarındak i son sınıf öğrencilerinin matematik dersine ilişkin tutumları. Unpublished master’s thesis, Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  9. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik. Ankara:
  10. Pegem Yayıncılık. Devine, A., Fawcett, K., Szucs, D. & Dowker, A. (2012). Gender differences in mathematics anxiety and the relation to mathematics performance while controlling for test anxiety. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 8 (33). Dowker, A. (2005). Individual differences in arithmetic: ımplications for psychology, neuroscience and education. New York, USA: Psychology Press.
  11. Dowker, A., Bennett, K. & Smith, L. (2012). Attitudes to mathematics in primary school children. Child Development Research, 2012.
  12. Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S. & Linn, M. C. (2010). Crossnational patterns of gender differences in mathematics: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136 (1), 103– 127. Ganley, C. M. & Vasilyeva, M. (2011). Sex differences in the relation between math performance, spatial skills, and attitudes. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32 (4), 235–242.
  13. McCallon, E. & Brown, J. (1971). A semantic differential instrument for measuring attitude toward mathematics. The Journal of Experimental Education