Journals / Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 14

BERLIN/ WALL: HARE İN GÖZÜ DÜNYANIN İKİ DUVARI ÜZERİNDE

BERLIN/ WALL: HARE'S EYES ON TWO WALLS OF THE WORLD

Pages
37–46
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This work primarily examines the sociological views andpolitical narratives of David Hare about the present and future of Germany, Israel and Palestine among thetraces of two walls.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The theatre audience currently has a thirst for hearing the political narratives of the playwrights.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In Berlin/ Wall, which are two separate monologue readings, the British playwright portrays new life conditionsof ordinary people of different communities via his own empirical observations and interviews after thetwo walls which were erected by world politics.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This work primarily examines the sociological views andpolitical narratives of David Hare about the present and future of Germany, Israel and Palestine among thetraces of two walls.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The theatre audience currently has a thirst for hearing the political narratives of the playwrights. As mediahas lost its reliability all over the world, the fans of theatre have preferred watching more political playsthan TV bulletins today. As one of the leading voices of the political theatre of the world, David Hare knowswhat expectations the audience has and what responsibilities political drama has. He handles the resultsof a lot of national and international political decisions over societies and individuals in his plays. In Berlin/ Wall, which are two separate monologue readings, the British playwright portrays new life conditionsof ordinary people of different communities via his own empirical observations and interviews after thetwo walls which were erected by world politics. This work primarily examines the sociological views andpolitical narratives of David Hare about the present and future of Germany, Israel and Palestine among thetraces of two walls.

Özet

Günümüzde tiyatro izleyicisi, oyun yazarlarının siyasal anlatılarına şiddetli istek duyar. Medya dünya çapındagüvenirliğini yitirdikçe, tiyatro takipçileri, televizyon bültenlerini izlemektense daha çok siyasal oyunlarizlemeyi tercih etmektedir. Dünya siyasal tiyatrosunun önder seslerinden biri olarak David Hare, tiyatroizleyicisin beklentilerini ve siyasal tiyatronun sorumluluklarını bilir. Oyunlarında birçok ulusal ve uluslararasısiyasal kararın toplumların ve bireylerin üzerindeki sonuçlarını ele alır. İngiliz oyun yazarı, iki ayrı monologtürde okuma olan Berlin/Wallda, kendi deneysel gözlemleri ve mülakatları yoluyla dünya siyasetinin diktiğiiki duvarın ardından farklı toplumların sıradan insanlarının yeni yaşam koşullarını yansıtır. Bu çalışma, ikiduvarın bıraktığı izler arasında David Harein özellikle Almanyanın, İsrailin ve Filistinin bugünü ve geleceğiile ilgili olarak toplumsal görüşlerini ve siyasal anlatılarını inceler.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, K. (2022). BERLIN/ WALL: HARE İN GÖZÜ DÜNYANIN İKİ DUVARI ÜZERİNDE. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 14, 37–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/587828

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Billington, M. (2009).
  2. Wall. The Guardian, Retrieved September 12, 2012, http://www.guardian.co.uk/ stage/2009/apr/20/wall-david-hare-theatre-review. Boireau, N. (2003). “Re-routing Radicalism with David Hare”, European Journal of English Studies, 7/1, pp.25-37.
  3. Bull, J. (1983). “David Hare: The state of the Nation”, New British Political Dramatists, Grove Press Inc., New York, pp.60-93.
  4. Cave, R. (1987). New British Drama on the London Stage: 1970 to 1985. London: Colin Smythe. Curtis, N. (2009). Blair is to blame for this mess and Brown can’t help us, says our leading political playwright. Evening Standard, Retrieved August 10, 2012, http://www.standard.co.uk/ news/david-hare-blair-is-to-blame-for-this-mess-6865745.html Dean, J. F. (1990).
  5. David Hare, Twayne Publishers, Boston/Oxford. Fraser, S. (1996). “Introduction”, A Politic Theatre: The Drama of David Hare, GA, Amsterdam/ Atlanta, pp 7-8.
  6. Gussow, M. (1985). “David Hare: Playwright as Provocateur”, New York Times Magazine, September 29, 1985, Retrieved November 20, 2012, http://www.nytimes.com/1985/09/29/ magazine/david-hare-playwright-as-provocateur.html Hare, D. (2005). “The play is in the Air”, Obedience, Struggle & Revolt: Lectures on Theatre, Faber and Faber, London, pp.111-124.
  7. Hare, D. (2009). Berlin/Wall, Faber and Faber, London. Homden, C. (1995). “Conclusion: a statement of arrival,” The Plays of David Hare, (Ed. C. Homden), Cambridge UP, Cambridge, pp.229-238.
  8. Kellaway, K. (2009). An Englishman in Berlin, via London’s South Bank. The Observer, 15 February. Retrieved July 11, 2012, http://www.guardian.co.uk/stage/2009/feb/15/davidhare-theatre
  9. Kritzer, A.H. (2008). Political Theatre in Post-Thatcher Britain: New Writing, 1995-2005,
  10. Palgrave Macmillan, Great Britain. Marranca, B. (2000). “Berlin Contemporary: An Editorial”, A Journal of Performance and Art, 22/2, May 2000, pp.1-6.
  11. Martin, C. (2006). “Bodies of Evidence”, TDR ( 1988-), 50/3, Autumn 2006, pp.8-15.
  12. Megson, C. and Rebellato, D. 2007. “Theatre and anti-theatre: David Hare and public speaking”, The Cambridge Companion to David Hare, (Ed. R. Boon), Cambridge UP, Cambridge, pp.236-249.
  13. Nicholson, S. (2007). “‘To ask how things might have been otherwise.’: History and memory in the work of David Hare”, A Cambridge Companion to David Hare, (Ed. R. Boon), Cambridge UP, Cambridge, pp.183-199.
  14. Oliva, J. L. (1990). David Hare: Theatricalizing Politics, (Ed. O. G. Brockett) UMI Research Press,
  15. Ann Arbor, London. Oliva, J. L. (1996). “David