SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Pamukkale Tıp Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3

Prevelance and associated factors of pinguecula in western Turkey

Batı Türkiye'de pinguekula prevalansı ve ilişkili faktörler

Hüseyin Dündar
Can Kocasarac
Pages
795–802
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The prevalence of pinguecula significantly increased with age (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: This study aimed to describe the prevalence and factors associated with pinguecula in the western part of Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: The study included 1443 participants over the age of 20 between January 2018 and October 2019.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The prevalence of pinguecula significantly increased with age (p
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to describe the prevalence and factors associated with pinguecula in the western part of Turkey. Materials and methods: The study included 1443 participants over the age of 20 between January 2018 and October 2019. The presence of pinguecula on slit lamp examination was recorded. A structured questionnaire which includes basic demographic data, occupational activity, educational level, alcohol consumption and smoking, dry eye questionnaire and systemic disorders such as diabetes or hypertension was applied. Results: The prevalence of pinguecula was 52.5%. Pinguecula prevalence was higher in males (58.4%) than females (46.8%). The prevalence of pinguecula significantly increased with age (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada Türkiye’nin batı bölgesindeki pinguekula prevalansı ve ilişkili risk faktörlerinin araştırılması amaçlandı. Gereç ve yöntem: Çalışmaya Ocak 2018 ile Ekim 2019 tarihleri arasında 20 yaş üstü 1443 katılımcı dahil edildi. Biomikroskopik muayene ile pinguekula varlığı ve lokalizasyonu kaydedildi. Temel demografik verileri, mesleki aktivite, eğitim düzeyi, alkol tüketimi ve sigara kullanımı, kuru göz anketi ve diyabet veya hipertansiyon gibi sistemik bozuklukları sorgulayan bir anket uygulandı. Bulgular: Pinguekula prevalansı %52,5 olarak tespit edildi. Pinguekula prevalansı erkeklerde (%58,4) kadınlardan (%46,8) daha yüksekti. Pinguekula prevalansında yaşla birlikte anlamlı derecede artış saptandı (p

🔖

Cite This Article

Dündar, H., Kocasarac, C. (2022). Prevelance and associated factors of pinguecula in western Turkey. Pamukkale Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3, 795–802. https://ajindex.com/articles/587122

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Taub MB. Ocular effects of ultraviolet radiation. Optometry Today 2004;44:34-38. http://www. optometry.co.uk/files/862d3760089d64ef0197535e41f 02fa6_taub20040618.pdf. Accessed 29 October 2005
  2. Mimura T, Usui T, Obata H, et al. Severity and determinants of pinguecula in a hospital-based population. Eye Contact Lens 2011;37:31-35. https:// doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0b013e3181f91f2f Oguz H, Karadede S, Bitiren M, Gürler B, Çakmak M. Tear functions in patients with pinguecula. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2001;79:262-265. https://doi. org/10.1034/j.1600-0420.2001.790310.x Soliman W, Mohamed TA. Spectral domain anterior segment optical coherence tomography assessment of pterygium and pinguecula. Acta Ophthalmol 2012;90:461-465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755- 3768.2010.01994.x Dong N, Li W, Lin H, et al. Abnormal epithelial differentiation and tear film alteration in pinguecula. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:2710-2715. https:// doi.org/10.1167/iovs.08-2905
  3. Jaros PA, DeLuise VP. Pingueculae and pterygia. Surv Ophthalmol 1988;33:41-49. https://doi. org/10.1016/0039-6257(88)90071-9
  4. Panchapakesan J, Hourihan F, Mitchell P. Prevalence of pterygium and pinguecula: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Aust NZJ Ophthalmol 1998;26:2-5. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.1998.tb01362.x Pham TQ, Wang JJ, Rochtchina E, Mitchell P. Pterygium/ pinguecula and the five-year incidence of age-related maculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;139:536-537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2004.08.070
  5. Viso E, Gude F, Rodríguez Ares MT. Prevalence of pinguecula and pterygium in a general population in Spain. Eye (Lond) 2011;25:350-357. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/eye.2010.204 Rezvan F, Hashemi H, Emamian MH, et al. The prevalence and determinants of pterygium and pinguecula in an urban population in Shahroud, Iran. Acta Med Iran 2012;50:689-696.
  6. Asokan R, Venkatasubbu RS, Velumuri L, Lingam V, George R. Prevalence and associated factors for pterygium and pinguecula in a South Indian population. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2012;32:39-44. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00882.x Fotouhi A, Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Mohammed K. Prevalence and risk factors of pterygium and pinguecula: the Tehran Eye Study. Eye (Lond) 2009;23:1125-1129. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2008.200
  7. Peiretti E, Dessì S, Putzolu M, Fosarello M. Hyperexpression of low-density lipoprotein receptors and hydroxy-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A-reductase in human pinguecula and primary pterygium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:3982-3985. https://d