SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 4

BLACK SEA REGION WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF REGIONALISM: FOREIGN POLICY DYNAMICS IN THE POSTCOLD WAR PERIOD

BÖLGESELCİLİK KAVRAMI IŞIĞINDA KARADENİZ BÖLGESİ: SOĞUK SAVAŞ SONRASI DIŞ POLİTİKA DİNAMİKLERİ

Efe SIVIŞ
Pages
563–577
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Within the framework of the regionalism, this paper seeks to explain the region’s complexity from both the EU and the U.S. standpoint, placing a special emphasis on the security aspect of the regional cooperation and covering the Black Sea Synergy of the EU, Wider Black Sea Region of U.S. and NATO’s related policies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Black Sea region represents an important crossroads between Europe, Central Asia and the Middle East.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The attention for the region was intensified amid the 2014 annexation of Crimea, thus paving a way for Russia to increase its military presence in the Black Sea – which posed a direct threat to NATO members.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Within the framework of the regionalism, this paper seeks to explain the region’s complexity from both the EU and the U.S. standpoint, placing a special emphasis on the security aspect of the regional cooperation and covering the Black Sea Synergy of the EU, Wider Black Sea Region of U.S. and NATO’s related policies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The Black Sea region represents an important crossroads between Europe, Central Asia and the Middle East. By hosting three NATO member states and NATO partner countries, the Black Sea is a battleground for the regional dominance of several powers, namely Russia, the U.S., Turkey and the EU. The attention for the region was intensified amid the 2014 annexation of Crimea, thus paving a way for Russia to increase its military presence in the Black Sea – which posed a direct threat to NATO members. Within the framework of the regionalism, this paper seeks to explain the region’s complexity from both the EU and the U.S. standpoint, placing a special emphasis on the security aspect of the regional cooperation and covering the Black Sea Synergy of the EU, Wider Black Sea Region of U.S. and NATO’s related policies.

Özet

Genişletilmiş Karadeniz Bölgesi Avrupa, Orta Asya ve Orta Doğu yollarının kesiştiği önemli bir noktadır. ÜçNATO üyesi devlet ve partner ülkesine ev sahipliği yapan Karadeniz; Rusya, ABD, Türkiye ve AB içinbölgesel egemenlik için bir mücadele alanı olarak tebarüz etmiştir. 2014’te Kırım’ın ilhakıyla beraberbölgenin daha çok dikkat çekmesi Rusya’nın Karadeniz’deki askeri mevcudiyetini artırmasına yol açmış vebu durum NATO üyeleri nezdinde doğrudan bir tehdit algılamasına neden olmuştur. Bu çalışma özelliklebölgesel işbirliğinin güvenlik yönüne odaklanarak, bölgeselcilik çerçevesinde bölgenin karmaşık yapısınıhem AB hem de ABD’nin bakış açısından incelemeyi hedeflemektedir. Çalışmada ABD’nin GenişletilmişKaradeniz Bölgesi, AB’nin Karadeniz Stratejisi ve NATO’nun bölgeye yönelik politikaları bölgeselcilikkavramı çerçevesinde ele alınmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SIVIŞ, E. (2022). BLACK SEA REGION WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF REGIONALISM: FOREIGN POLICY DYNAMICS IN THE POSTCOLD WAR PERIOD. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 4, 563–577. https://ajindex.com/articles/586543

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Al Jazeera. (2019). Turkey is 'taking into account' NATO concerns over S-400. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/04/turkey-account-nato-concerns-400-190419110413250.html.
  2. Anderson, K. and H. Norheim. (1993). Is World Trade Becoming More Regionalized?”. Review of International Economics, 1 (2), 91-109.
  3. Atalay, Bülent. (2008).
  4. MONTREUX BOĞAZLAR SÖZLEŞMESİ, Yayımlanmamış Yükseklisans Tezi, Trakya Üniversitesi,
  5. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Aydın, Mustafa. (2004). Europe’s Next Shore: the Black Sea Region after EU Enlargement, European Union Institute for Security Studies, Retrieved 10 October 2019 from the https://www.iss.europa.eu/sites/default/files/EUISSFiles/occ53.pdf
  6. European Parliament. (2019). Report on the State of EU-Russia Political Relations. Committee on Foreign Affairs, Retrieved 12 January 2019 from the http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8- 2019-0073_EN.pdf. Baker, P. (2019). U.S. Policy on Russia? Trump and His Team Might Give Different Answers, The New York Times, Retrieved 12 January 2019 from the https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/20/us/politics/trumprussia-policy.html.
  7. Baldwin, R. (1993). A Domino Theory of Regionalism. NBER Working Paper Series, No. 4465, pp. 1-21. Retrieved January 18, 2019 from the https://www.nber.org/papers/w4465.
  8. BBC News. (2019). U.S. Warns Turkey over Russian S-400 Missile System Deal, Retrieved 10 January 2019 from the https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-47809827.
  9. Börzel, T. A. and T. Risse (2016). Theorizing Regionalism: Cooperation, Integration, and Governance, Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism (Ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press., 2016.
  10. BSEC Organisation (1992), Retrieved 12 January 2019 from the http://www.bsec-organization.org/.
  11. Bozkurt, G. S. (Ed.). (2014). Blue Black Sea: New Dimensions of History, Security, Strategy, Energy and Economy. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Börzel, T. A (2011),
  12. Comparative Regionalism, A New Research Agenda. KFG Working Paper, No. 28, Free University of Berlin, Retrieved January March 10, 2019 from the https://www.polsoz.fuberlin.de/en/v/transformeurope/publications/working_paper/wp/wp28/WP_28_Boerzel.pdf.
  13. Brzezinski, Z. (1997),
  14. A Geostrategy for Eurasia, Foreign Affairs. 76(50). Bugajski, J. and P. B. Doran (2016),
  15. Black Sea Rising, Russia’s Strategy in Southeast Europe. Center for European Policy Analysis, Black Sea Strategic Report No. 1. Buzan, Barry (1991).
  16. People, States and Fear: A.n Agenda For international Security Srudies in the Po sf. Cold War Er