Journals / OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 45

Coopetition as a Strategic Enabler of Innovation in Transition Economies

Pages
19–34
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The main features and challenging aspects of these ideas and approaches are explained in details.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Transition economies have distinctive opportunities and challenges compared to other economies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Limited sources, environmental forces, rapid changes in technology, cost and complexity of research drive organizations to form strategic alliances with their competitors and prefer innovation through coopetition.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The main features and challenging aspects of these ideas and approaches are explained in details.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Transition Economies · Innovation · Coopetition

Abstract

Transition economies have distinctive opportunities and challenges compared to other economies. Innovation is among the major contributors for development and welfare in countries with transition economies. Limited sources, environmental forces, rapid changes in technology, cost and complexity of research drive organizations to form strategic alliances with their competitors and prefer innovation through coopetition. Transition economies with their unique characteristics compared to other economies and potential of achievable benefits from innovation require particular attention. This study identifies, describes and discusses the promising areas of research methods and perspectives about innovation through coopetition in transition economies. A comprehensive critical evaluation of the underlying dynamics of innovation through coopetition and innovation in transition economies, aided by bibliometric mapping and analysis showed the promising enabling potential of coopetition for innovation in challenging conditions of transition economies. The viable and beneficial coopetition ideas and approaches are identified, represented and discussed to enable effective innovation in transition economies. The main features and challenging aspects of these ideas and approaches are explained in details.

🔖

Cite This Article

ZEHİR, S., ZEHİR, M., BAŞAR, D. (2022). Coopetition as a Strategic Enabler of Innovation in Transition Economies. OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 45, 19–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/585498

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Aidis, R., Estrin, S. and Mickiewicz, T. (2008). Institutions and entrepreneurship development in Russia: A comparative perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(6), 656-672.
  2. Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P. and Zilibotti, F. (2006). Distance to frontier, selection, and economic growth. Journal of the European Economic Association, 4(1), 37-74.
  3. Acs, Z. J. and Szerb, L. (2007). Entrepreneurship, economic growth and public policy. Small Business Economics, 28(2), 109-122.
  4. Apanasovich, N., Heras, H. A. and Parrilli, M. D. (2016). The impact of business innovation modes on SME innovation performance in post-Soviet transition economies: The case of Belarus. Technovation, 57, 30-40.
  5. Belderbos, R., Carree, M. and Lokshin, B. (2004). Cooperative R&D and firm performance. Research Policy, 33(10), 1477-1492.
  6. Bengtsson, M. and Kock, S. (2014). Coopetition—Quo vadis? Past accomplishments and future challenges. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 180-188.
  7. Bengtsson, M. and Raza-Ullah, T. (2016). A systematic review of research on coopetition: Toward a multilevel understanding. Industrial Marketing Management, 57, 23-39.
  8. Bengtsson, M., Raza-Ullah, T., & Vanyushyn, V. (2016). The coopetition paradox and tension: The moderating role of coopetition capability. Industrial Marketing Management, 53, 19-30.
  9. Bouncken, R. B. and Fredrich, V. (2012). Coopetition: performance implications and management antecedents. International Journal of Innovation Management, 16(05), 1250028. Bouncken, R. B. and Kraus, S. (2013). Innovation in knowledge-intensive industries: The double-edged sword of coopetition. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 2060-2070.
  10. Bouncken, R. B., Gast, J., Kraus, S. and Bogers, M. (2015). Coopetition: a systematic review, synthesis, and future research directions. Review of Managerial Science, 9(3), 577-601.
  11. Bouncken, R. B., Fredrich, V., Ritala, P. and Kraus, S. (2018). Coopetition in new product development alliances: advantages and tensions for incremental and radical innovation. British Journal of Management, 29(3), 391-410.
  12. Capello, R. and Lenzi, C. (2013). Territorial patterns of innovation: a taxonomy of innovative regions in Europe. The Annals of Regional Science, 51(1), 119-154.
  13. Chen, Y. S. and Chen, B. Y. (2011). Utilizing patent analysis to explore the cooperative competition relationship of the two LED companies: Nichia and Osram. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(2), 294-302.
  14. Cheung, K. Y. and Ping, L. (2004). Spillover effects of FDI