Journals / OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 47

Comparative Analysis of Covid-19 Government Strategies in Argentina, Brazil, India, Pakistan, and Turkey

Pages
448–461
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results demonstrated that there was a lack of coordination to follow the plans and political use of the pandemic to cover the tackling of problems awaiting resolution.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this research was to show how covid-19 was managed by governments across different nations – Argentina, Brazil, India, Pakistan, and Turkey – focusing on political, economic, and social aspects.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Research covered the period from April 2020 to April 2021.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results demonstrated that there was a lack of coordination to follow the plans and political use of the pandemic to cover the tackling of problems awaiting resolution.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Institutional Logics · Covid-19 Politics · Pandemic Management

Abstract

The aim of this research was to show how covid-19 was managed by governments across different nations – Argentina, Brazil, India, Pakistan, and Turkey – focusing on political, economic, and social aspects. Research covered the period from April 2020 to April 2021. After showing data about the pandemic, this research did an analysis of the official discourse and the measures adopted by using comparative and qualitative content analysis as methodological approach. In the research, figures were contrasted with the authorities’ measures and their outcome in terms of immunization level and number of deaths. Results demonstrated that there was a lack of coordination to follow the plans and political use of the pandemic to cover the tackling of problems awaiting resolution. Given the global extent of the covid-19 pandemic and its negative consequences, it was concluded that it would have been wise to treat it as a pan-coordination action beyond national borders instead of addressing individual countries’ interests. Such approach would have allowed to accelerate reaction and benchmark practices to achieve a faster mitigation of harmful effects, thereby saving millions of human lives, as well as preventing the devastating consequences in the economic and social realm.

🔖

Cite This Article

FERNANDO, J. T., FURFARO, R. D., RAJPUT, M. A., BAYKARA, S. T. (2022). Comparative Analysis of Covid-19 Government Strategies in Argentina, Brazil, India, Pakistan, and Turkey. OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 47, 448–461. https://ajindex.com/articles/585488

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Akhtar, H., Afridi, M., Akhtar, S., Ahmad, H., Ali, S., Khalid, S., Awan, S.M., Jahangiri, S., Khader, Y.S. (2021). Pakistan’s response to COVID-19: Overcoming national and international hypes to fight the pandemic. JMIR Public Health Surveill, 7(5):e28517doi:10.2196/28517. Aldrich, H. E. and Ruef, M. (1999). Organizations evolving. London: Sage. Altheide, D. L., & Schneider, C. J. (2013). Qualitative media analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Amis, J., & Greenwood, R. (2020). Organisational change in a (post-) pandemic world: Rediscovering interests and values. Journal of Management Studies, 58(2), 582-586.
  2. Amnesty International (2020) Report on Argentina. https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/americas/south-america/argentina/report-argentina/ (July 20, 2022). Asian development outlook (ADO), (2021). Asian development bank: Financing a green and inclusive recovery retrieved from https://www.adb.org/publications/asian-development-outlook-2021 (2021, May 26). Azarian, R. (2011). Potentials and limitations of comparative method in social science. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(4), 113–125.
  3. BBC. (2021). https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler-turkiye-55657237. (January 14, 2022).
  4. Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. Glencoe: Free Press.
  5. Bhatt, M., Srivastava, S., Schmidt-Sane, M., & Mehta, L. (2021). Key considerations: India’s deadly second COVID-19 wave: Addressing Impacts and Building Preparedness against Future Waves’ Briefing, Brighton: Social Science in Humanitarian Action (SSHAP) https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/16718?show=full (Erişim Tarihi: May 23, 2021).
  6. Clarin (2021). La dura crítica del diario El País por el manejo del coronavirus en Argentina. https://www.clarin.com>sociedad (January 5, 2022). Coronavirus, (2021). India becomes first country in the world to report over 4 lakh new cases. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/coronavirus-india-becomes-first-country-in-the-world-to-report-over-400000-new-cases-on-april-30-2021/article61817889.ece. (2021, April 30). COVID-19 health advisory platform, ministry of national health services regulations and coordination (2021). https://covid.gov.pk/ (August 21, 2021). Covid-19 in India: Why second coronavirus wave is devastating. (2021, April 20). BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-56811315 (January 10, 2022).
  7. Cozza, M. et al. (2021). COVID‐19 as a breakdown in the texture of social practices. Gender, Work &