Journals / OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 46

Hospital Selection of Health Tourists: A Study with Ahp and Topsis Methods

Pages
327–339
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, necessary improvements should be made by applying satisfaction surveys to health tourists.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Developments in transport and communication technologies have made traveling easier between countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The opinions of seven experts, who are experts in their field at least ten years, were taken by using the 9-scale evaluation scale developed by Saaty.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, necessary improvements should be made by applying satisfaction surveys to health tourists.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Health Tourism · Multi-Criteria Decision Making · AHP

Abstract

Developments in transport and communication technologies have made traveling easier between countries. In addition to these developments, the search for low-cost and high-quality health services has been effective in the development of the health tourism sector. This study aims to determine the hospital preferences of health tourists with Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methods in line with expert opinions. Within the scope of this study, the criteria affecting the hospital preferences of health tourists were weighted with the AHP method, and ideal hospital alternative for health tourists was selected with the TOPSIS method by using the criteria weights obtained. The opinions of seven experts, who are experts in their field at least ten years, were taken by using the 9-scale evaluation scale developed by Saaty. As a result of expert opinions; it has been determined that qualified health personnel, quality of medical care applied, modern equipment of the hospital, recommendability of the hospital and health personnel are more effective. For a preferable hospital strategy within the scope of health tourism, deficiencies of health personnel in terms of foreign language and professional experience should be eliminated, and devices that will increase the preferability of the hospital by following technological developments should be used. In addition, necessary improvements should be made by applying satisfaction surveys to health tourists.

🔖

Cite This Article

Şahin, K., Cezlan, E. Ç. (2022). Hospital Selection of Health Tourists: A Study with Ahp and Topsis Methods. OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 46, 327–339. https://ajindex.com/articles/585459

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Akman, K. (2019). Çok ölçütlü karar verme yöntemlerinde AHP ve TOPSIS ile araba seçimi. Necmettin Erbakan University, Institute of Science and Technology, Master's Thesis, Konya. Ayçin, E. (2019). Çok kriterli karar verme bilgisayar uygulamalı çözümler. Ankara:
  2. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık. Belber, B. G. (2015). Yaş ve medeni duruma göre "özel hastanelerin yaptığı tanıtım" hastanenin prestijine, tanınırlığına ve tercih edilebilirliğine etkisi: Nevşehir uygulaması. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 1(2), 425-438.
  3. Bostan, S., & Yalçın, B. (2016). Sağlık Turistlerinin medikal destinasyon seçimini etkileyen fakötrler. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 9(43), 1729-1735.
  4. Burtan Doğan, B., & Aslan, A. (2019). Türkiye'de sağlık turizminin mevcut durumu ve ülke ekonomisine katkıları. Dicle Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(18), 390-418.
  5. Buzcu, Z., & Birdir, K. (2019). Türkiye’de medikal turizm incelemesi: Özel hastanelerde bir çalışma. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 18(1), 311-327.
  6. Connell, J. (2006). Medical tourism: Sea, sun, sand and y surgery. Tourism Management, 27, 1093-1100.
  7. Çelikbilek, Y., & Özdemir, M. (2020). Çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri açıklamalı ve karşılaştırmalı sağlık bilimleri uygulamaları ile. Ankara:
  8. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık. Değer, M. (2020). Rekreasyonda Yeni Trendler: Spa & Wellness. Journal of Recreation and Tourism Research, 7(2), 308-324.
  9. Demir Uslu, Y., Kedikli, E., Yılmaz, E., Çiçek, A., Karataş, M., & Aydın, S. (2021). Developing Strategies for ıncreasing market share of Turkey on health tourism by using fuzzy AHP Method. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 10(2), 159-171.
  10. Erdoğan, E., & Aklanoğlu, F. (2008). Termal turizm ve Afyon-Gazlıgöl Örneği. e-Journal of New World Sciences Academy, 3(1), 83-92.
  11. Ergen, F., & Aydemir, B. (2020). Medikal turizm girişimciliği: İstanbul örneği. Türk Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(2), 1607-1623.
  12. Görener, A. (2016). A SWOT-AHP approach for assessment of medical tourism sector in Turkey. alphanumeric journal, 4(2), 159-170.
  13. Hasanova, Y. (2019). Uluslararası hastaların hacettepe üniversite hastanelerini tercih nedenleri, hizmet ile ilgili değerlendirmeleri ve yaşadıkları sorunlar. Hacettepe University, Institute of Social Sciences, Ankara.
  14. İpek, U. (2019). Kuruluş yeri seçiminde çok kriterli karar verme teknikleri: Analitik hiyerarşi süreci ve TOPSIS örneği. Toros University Institute of Social Sciences