Journals / Neurological sciences and neurophysiology (Online) / 2021 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 3

The Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire and the Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

Pages
173–179
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: The Turkish version of the TUQ and the TSQ are valid and reliable in MS patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of the study was to translate and cross‑culturally adapt the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ) and the Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ) into Turkish and also to analyze the reliability and validity of both questionnaires.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: A total of 107 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients were recruited.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: The Turkish version of the TUQ and the TSQ are valid and reliable in MS patients.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to translate and cross‑culturally adapt the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ) and the Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ) into Turkish and also to analyze the reliability and validity of both questionnaires. Materials and Methods: A total of 107 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients were recruited. The department clinician monitored all participants with telemedicine for 4 years. Internal consistency was evaluated with Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. The test–retest reliability was calculated with intraclass correlation coefficient by analyzing the scores of retested 52 patients 1 week later. The construct validity was examined by Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r). Besides, the internal consistency for the subscores of the TUQ and exploratory factor analysis of the TSQ was analyzed.Results: The mean age was 40.5 ± 11.0 years. Internal consistency of all items and the total score of the TUQ were excellent (>0.80; ranged: 0.976–0.979). On the other hand, the internal consistency of all items and total score of the TSQ was excellent, either (>0.80; ranged: 0.969–0.973). The reproducibility of the total score for the TUQ was excellent (>0.80). The test–retest reliability of all items and the total score of the TSQ were within limits ranging from acceptable to excellent (0.617–0.860). The reliability of the total score for the TSQ was excellent (>0.80). The internal consistency of all subscales of the TUQ was excellent (>0.80). The correlation between TUQ and TSQ was strong (r = 0.882, P < 0.001). The factor loading scores of the TSQ were high (0.814–0.919). Conclusions: The Turkish version of the TUQ and the TSQ are valid and reliable in MS patients.

🔖

Cite This Article

SARI, Z., ÖZKESKİN, M., ÖZDEN, F., EKMEKÇİ, Ö., YÜCEYAR, N. (2022). The Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire and the Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. Neurological sciences and neurophysiology (Online), Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 3, 173–179. https://ajindex.com/articles/584291

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Galea MD. Telemedicine in rehabilitation. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2019;30:473‑83
  2. Kruse CS, Krowski N, Rodriguez B, Tran L, Vela J, Brooks M. Telehealth and patient satisfaction: A systematic review and narrative analysis. BMJ Open 2017;7:e016242
  3. Hatcher‑Martin JM, Adams JL, Anderson ER, Bove R, Burrus TM, Chehrenama M,et al. Telemedicine in neurology: Telemedicine Work Group of the American Academy of Neurology update. Neurology 2020;94:30‑8
  4. Chumbler NR, Quigley P, Li X, Morey M, Rose D, Sanford J, et al. Effects of telerehabilitation on physical function and disability for stroke patients: A randomized, controlled trial. Stroke 2012;43:2168‑74
  5. Amatya B, Galea MP, Kesselring J, Khan F. Effectiveness of telerehabilitation interventions in persons with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2015;4:358‑69
  6. Cavalera C, Pagnini F, Rovaris M, Mendozzi L, Pugnetti L, Garegnani M, et al. A telemedicine meditation intervention for people with multiple sclerosis and their caregivers: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2016;17:4
  7. Robb JF, Hyland MH, Goodman AD. Comparison of telemedicine versus in‑person visits for persons with multiple sclerosis: A randomized crossover study of feasibility, cost, and satisfaction. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2019;36:101258
  8. Minden SL, Hoaglin DC, Hadden L, Frankel D, Robbins T, Perloff J. Access to and utilization of neurologists by people with multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2008;70:1141‑9
  9. Rogante M, Grigioni M, Cordella D, Giacomozzi C. Ten years of telerehabilitation: A literature overview of technologies and clinical applications. NeuroRehabilitation 2010;27:287‑304
  10. Hailey D, Roine R, Ohinmaa A, Dennett L. Evidence of benefit from telerehabilitation in routine care: A systematic review. J Telemed Telecare 2011;17:281‑7
  11. Syed MJ, Shah Z, Awan S, Wasay M, Fredrikson S. Telephone validation of an Urdu translated version of the extended disability severity scale in multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2021;48:102684
  12. Domingues RB, Mantese CE, Aquino ED, Fantini FG, Prado GF, Nitrini R. Telemedicine in neurology: Current evidence. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2020;78:818‑26
  13. Yeroushalmi S, Maloni H, Costello K, Wallin MT. Telemedicine and multiple sclerosis: A comprehensive literature review. J Telemed Telecare 2020;26:400‑13
  14. Khan F, Amatya B, Kesselring J, Galea M. Telerehabilitation for persons with multiple sclerosis. Cochrane