Journals / Neurological sciences and neurophysiology (Online) / 2022 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 2

The Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Fatigue Assessment Scale in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

Pages
109–114
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: The Turkish FAS is a reliable and valid scale for individuals with MS.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To demonstrate the psychometric properties of the Turkish Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: A total of 104 patients were recruited.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: The Turkish FAS is a reliable and valid scale for individuals with MS.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To demonstrate the psychometric properties of the Turkish Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS). Materials and Methods: A total of 104 patients were recruited. The patients were assessed twice, 1 week apart. Patients completed the FAS, Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), EuroQol 5 dimensions 3 L (EQ 5D 3 L), and Beck Depression Scale (BDS) in the initial assessment. Thirty four patients completed the FAS again in the second assessment. Results: The mean age of the patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) was 37.6 ± 10.1 years. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of the FAS was excellent (ICC = 0.812). The Cronbach alpha coefficient of the FAS was 0.914. The alpha of the FAS was excellent (>0.80). Standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change of the FAS were 3.51 and 9.73 respectively. The relationship between the FAS (test, retest) and the FSS was excellent (r1 = 0.767, r2 = 0.782, P < 0.01). The EQ 5D 3 L index score was both strongly related with FAS (test, retest) (r1 = −0.500, r2 = −0.745, P < 0.01). The EQ 5D 3 L Visual Analog Scale score was also highly correlated with FAS (test, retest) (r1 = −0.536, r2 = −0.764, P < 0.01). Besides, FAS (test, retest) scores were strongly correlated with BDS total scores (r1 = 0.540, r2 = 0.571, P < 0.01). Conclusions: The Turkish FAS is a reliable and valid scale for individuals with MS.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özkeskin, M., Özden, F., Yüceyar, N. (2022). The Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Fatigue Assessment Scale in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. Neurological sciences and neurophysiology (Online), Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 2, 109–114. https://ajindex.com/articles/584277

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Nedeljkovic U, Raspopovic ED, Ilic N, Vujadinovic ST, Soldatovic I, Drulovic J. Effectiveness of rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis relapse on fatigue, self efficacy and physical activity. Acta Neurol Belg 2016;116:309 15
  2. Braley TJ, Chervin RD. Fatigue in multiple sclerosis: Mechanisms, evaluation, and treatment. Sleep 2010;33:1061 7
  3. Schließeit J, Oertel FC, Cooper G, Brandt AU, Bellmann Strobl J. Longitudinal analysis of primary and secondary factors related to fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Belg 2021;121:271 4
  4. Kluger BM, Krupp LB, Enoka RM. Fatigue and fatigability in neurologic illnesses: Proposal for a unified taxonomy. Neurology 2013;80:409 16
  5. Johansson S, Ytterberg C, Claesson IM, Lindberg J, Hillert J, Andersson M, et al. High concurrent presence of disability in multiple sclerosis. Associations with perceived health. J Neurol 2007;254:767 73
  6. Haselkorn JK, Balsdon Richer C, Fry Welch D, Herndon RM, Johnson B, Little JW, et al. Overview of spasticity management in multiple sclerosis. Evidence based management strategies for spasticity treatment in multiple sclerosis. J Spinal Cord Med 2005;28:167 99
  7. Isuru I, Cris SC, Bruno G. Fatigue in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 2012;323:9 15
  8. Langeskov Christensen M, Bisson EJ, Finlayson ML, Dalgas U. Potential pathophysiological pathways that can explain the positive effects of exercise on fatigue in multiple sclerosis: A scoping review. J Neurol Sci 2017;373:307 20
  9. Krupp LB, Serafin DJ, Christodoulou C. Multiple sclerosis associated fatigue. Expert Rev Neurother 2010;10:1437 47
  10. Pilutti LA, Greenlee TA, Motl RW, Nickrent MS, Petruzzello SJ. Effects of exercise training on fatigue in multiple sclerosis: A meta analysis. Psychosom Med 2013;75:575 80
  11. Dalgas U, Langeskov Christensen M, Skjerbæk A, Jensen E, Baert I, Romberg A, et al. Is the impact of fatigue related to walking capacity and perceived ability in persons with multiple sclerosis? A multicenter study. J Neurol Sci 2018;387:179 86
  12. Bailey A, Channon S, Beaumont JG. The relationship between subjective fatigue and cognitive fatigue in advanced multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2007;13:73 80
  13. Armutlu K, Korkmaz NC, Keser I, Sumbuloglu V, Akbiyik DI, Guney Z, et al. The validity and reliability of the Fatigue Severity Scale in Turkish multiple sclerosis patients. Int J Rehabil Res 2007;30:81 5
  14. Armutlu K, Keser I, Korkmaz N, Akbiyik DI, Sümbüloğlu V, Güney Z, et al. Psychometric study of T