SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

Variables Associated with Students’ Science Achievement in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA 2009)

Uluslararası Öğrenci Değerlendirme Programı'nda (PISA 2009) Öğrencilerin Fen Başarılarının Çeşitli Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi

Cem Oktay GÜZELLER
Fatih ŞEKER.
Pages
1–20
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that there was a significant difference between students’ success inscience and a number of variables, namely, gender, school type, region, pre-school education, parents' educationlevel.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to analyze some of the variables that affect Turkish students’ success inscience using data from the PISA 2009 student survey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The universe for the investigation comprised 15-year-oldTurkish students who were completing their compulsory education.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that there was a significant difference between students’ success inscience and a number of variables, namely, gender, school type, region, pre-school education, parents' educationlevel.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze some of the variables that affect Turkish students’ success inscience using data from the PISA 2009 student survey. The universe for the investigation comprised 15-year-oldTurkish students who were completing their compulsory education. The sample consisted of 4996 students whowere selected through stratified sampling from this universe. Missing data were examined before analysiscommenced and missing data were excluded from the analysis. The final sample comprised 4388 students.Independent t-tests, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple comparisons were used in accordance with thepurpose of the study. The results showed that there was a significant difference between students’ success inscience and a number of variables, namely, gender, school type, region, pre-school education, parents' educationlevel.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı PISA 2009 çalışmasında Türkiye’deki öğrencilerin fen başarısını etkileyen bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmiştir. Bu çalış mada, PISA 2009 öğrenci anket verisi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın evrenini, herhangi bir okula devam eden 15 yaşındaki Türk öğrenciler oluşturmaktadır. Örneklemini ise bu evrenden tabakalı örnekleme yoluyla seçilen 4996 öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Analizlere başlanmadan önce kayıp veriler incelenmiş ve kayıp veriler analizden çıkartılmıştır. Analiz için son örneklem büyüklüğü 4388 öğrencidir. Çalış manın amacına uygun olarak bağımsız t testi, varyans analizi (ANOVA) ve çoklu karşılaştırmalar kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre öğrencilerin fen başarısı ile okul türü, bölge, okul öncesi eğitimi alıp almama durumu, anne ve babanın eğitim seviyesi değişkenlerine göre anlamlı bir farkın olduğu belirlenmiştir. Fen başarı puanları, anne ve babanın eğitim seviyesi arttıkça artmaktadır. Okul öncesi eğitimi alan bireylerin almayanlara oranla, genel liselerde öğrenim görenlerin bireylerin diğer liselerde öğrenim gören bireylere oranla daha yüksek fen başarı puanlarının olduğu belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜZELLER, C. O., ŞEKER., F. (2022). Variables Associated with Students’ Science Achievement in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA 2009). Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 1–20. https://ajindex.com/articles/584131

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Acar, T. (2012). The Position of Turkey among OECD member and candidate countries according to PISA 2009 results. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12(4), 2567-2572.
  2. Acar, T., & Öğretmen, T. (2012). Analysis of 2006 PISA science performance via multilevel statistical methods. Education and Science, 37 (163), 178-189.
  3. Akyüz, G., & Pala, N.M. (2010). The effect of student and class characteristics on mathematics literacy and problem solving in PISA 2003. Elementary Education Online, 9(2), 668–678.
  4. Alacacı, C., & Erbaş, A.K. (2010). Unpacking the inequality among Turkish schools: indings from PISA 2006. International Journal of Educational Development, 30(2), 182-192.
  5. Anagnostopoulou, K., Hatzinikita, V., Christidou, V., & Dimopoulos, K. (2013). Pisa test items and school-based examinations in Greece: Exploring the relationship between global and local assessment discourses. International Journal of Science Education, 35(4), 636–662.
  6. Anagün, Ş.S. (2011). The impact of teaching-learning process variable to the students’ scientific literacy levels based on PISA 2006 results. Education and Science, 36(132), 84-102.
  7. Anderson, B. (1994). The effect of preschool education on academic achievement of at risk children. Retrived March 12, 2013, from the ERIC database. Anıl, D. (2009). Factors effecting science achievement of science students in programme for international students’ achievement (PISA) in Turkey. Education and Science, 34(152), 87-100.
  8. Arıcı, Ö., & Altıntaş, Ö. (2014). An investigation of the PISA 2009 reading literacy in terms of socio-economical backgrounds and receiving pre-school education “Turkey Example”. Ankara University, Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 47(1), 423- 448. Aydın, A., Sarıer, Y., & Uysal, Ş. (2012). The comparative assessment of the results of PISA mathematical literacy in terms of socio-economic and socio-cultural variables. Education and Science, 37(164), 20-30.
  9. Aydıner, A. (2006).
  10. In the process of full membership, European Union education policies and their effects on Turkish education system. Published Master’s Thesis. Gazi University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
  11. Aydoğdu, M., Şensoy, Ö., & Yıldırım, H.İ. (2008). Analysis of the relationship among cognitive growth, science achievement, attitudes towards science and gender of the eighth graders. Kastamonu Education Journal, 16(2), 439-450.
  12. Atalay Kabasakal, K., & Kelecioğlu, H. (2012). Evaluation of attitude items in PISA 2006 student questionnair