Journals / Namık Kemal Tıp Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Investigation of Turkish People’s Attitudes Towards the COVID-19 Pandemic Quarantine Process

Türk Halkının COVID-19 Pandemisi Karantina Sürecine Yönelik Tutumlarının Bilişsel, Duyuşsal ve Davranışsal Boyutta İncelenmesi

Pages
152–165
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Other resultsobtained from the study are given in the relevant tables and figures.Conclusion: It was determined that the affective dimension had the highest effect on the results of EFA, CFA and SEM analyses, which wereeffective in examining the attitudes of individuals towards an event with these sub-dimensions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of study is to determine the attitude of the Turkish people (in cognitive, affective and behavioral dimensions) and the factors affectingthis attitude during the coronavirus epidemic that has affected the whole world since December 2019.Materials and Methods: The data collected by a scale were modeled with explanatory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)and structural equation modeling (SEM), and the effects of the dimensions and the importance of the effective items in each dimension weredetermined.Results: 61.4% of the participants were male and 65.4% were under the age of 40 years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Individuals’ “questioning their purpose of coming to lifeagain” and “desire of being more sensitive to the events around them than in the past” were found to be significant, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Other resultsobtained from the study are given in the relevant tables and figures.Conclusion: It was determined that the affective dimension had the highest effect on the results of EFA, CFA and SEM analyses, which wereeffective in examining the attitudes of individuals towards an event with these sub-dimensions.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of study is to determine the attitude of the Turkish people (in cognitive, affective and behavioral dimensions) and the factors affectingthis attitude during the coronavirus epidemic that has affected the whole world since December 2019.Materials and Methods: The data collected by a scale were modeled with explanatory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)and structural equation modeling (SEM), and the effects of the dimensions and the importance of the effective items in each dimension weredetermined.Results: 61.4% of the participants were male and 65.4% were under the age of 40 years. Individuals’ “questioning their purpose of coming to lifeagain” and “desire of being more sensitive to the events around them than in the past” were found to be significant, respectively. Other resultsobtained from the study are given in the relevant tables and figures.Conclusion: It was determined that the affective dimension had the highest effect on the results of EFA, CFA and SEM analyses, which wereeffective in examining the attitudes of individuals towards an event with these sub-dimensions.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, Aralık 2019’dan beri tüm dünyayı etkisi altına alan koronavirüs salgını süresince Türk halkının sergilediği tutumu (bilişsel, duyuşsal ve davranışsal boyutlarda) ve bu tutum üzerinde etkili olan etmenleri belirlemektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bir ölçek aracılığı ile derlenen veriler açıklayıcı faktör analizi (AFA), doğrulayıcı faktör analizi (DFA), yapısal eşitlik modellemesi (YEM) ile modellenerek, boyutlar arası ilişkiler ile her bir boyutta etkili olan maddelerin önemleri belirlenmiştir. Bulgular: Katılımcıların %61,4’ü erkek ve %65,4’ü 40 yaş altıdır. Bireylerin tutumlarını açıklayan alt boyutlardan davranışsal boyut üzerinde bireylerin ekonomik tedbirlere vereceği önemin en etkili değişken olduğu, bilişsel ve duyuşsal boyutlarda ise sırası ile bireylerin hayata geliş amaçlarını tekrar sorgulamaları ve çevrelerindeki olaylara karşı geçmiştekinden daha duyarlı olacaklarının önemi anlamlı bulunmuştur. Çalışmadan elde edilen diğer sonuçlar ilgili tablo ve şekillerde verilmiştir. Sonuç: Bireylerin bir olaya karşı olan tutumlarının bu alt boyutlar ile incelenmesi noktasında etkili olan istatistiksel yöntemlerden AFA, DFA ve YEM analizi sonuçlarında duyuşsal boyutun etkisinin en yüksek olduğu belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GAZELOĞLU, C., SARAÇLI, S., AKŞİT, M., BERK, İ., DURMAZ, Y., TUNCA, B., ÖZGÖREN, E., İPEK, B., DEMİR, M., FERMANCI, N., BABACAN, Ş. (2022). Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Investigation of Turkish People’s Attitudes Towards the COVID-19 Pandemic Quarantine Process. Namık Kemal Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 152–165. https://ajindex.com/articles/584050

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Honigsbaum M. Pandemic. Lancet. 2009;373:1939
  2. Morens DM, Folkers GK, Fauci AS. What is a pandemic? J Infect Dis. 2009;200:1018-21
  3. Last JM. Dictionary of Epidemiology. Fourth Edition. John M. Last, Robert A. Spasoff, and Susan S. Harris (edited). 2000
  4. Qiu W, Rutherford S, Mao A, Chu C. The Pandemic and its Impacts. Health, Culture and Society, Dec. 2017:1-11
  5. Morens DM, Taubenberger JK, Folkers GK, Fauci AS. Pandemic influenza’s 500th anniversary. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51:1442-4
  6. Madhav N, Oppenheim B, Gallivan M, Mulembakani P, Rubin E, Nathan Wolfe N, Pandemics: Risks, Impacts, and Mitigation” (Chapter 17 in Disease Control Priorities. Editors: Jamison D.T, Gelband H, Horton S, Jha, P, Laxminarayan R, Mock C.N and Nugent R, Third Edition, The World Bank Group, Washington: DC. 2018
  7. Çakır Z, Savaş H.B. A mathematical modelling for the COVID-19 pandemic in Iran. Ortadogu Tıp Dergisi. 2020;12:206-10
  8. Çobanoğlu N. Bireysel, Profesyonel, Toplumsal, Bilimsel ve Siyasal Etiği Yeniden Sorgulatan COVID-19 Pandemisi. Anatolian Clinic the Journal of Medical Sciences. 2020;25:36-42
  9. Sadique MZ, Edmunds WJ, Smith RD, Meerding WJ, de Zwart O, Brug J, et al. Precautionary behavior in response to perceived threat of pandemic influenza. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:1307-13
  10. Brewer NT, Chapman GB, Gibbons FX, Gerrard M, McCaul KD, Weinstein ND. Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: the example of vaccination. Health Psychol. 2007;26:136-45. 11. de Zwart O, Veldhuijzen IK, Elam G, Aro AR, Abraham T, Bishop GD, et al. Perceived threat, risk perception, and efficacy beliefs related to SARS and other (emerging) infectious diseases: results of an international survey. Int J Behav Med. 2009;16:30-40
  11. Siu W. Extended parallel process model and H5N1 influenza virus. Psychol Rep. 2008;102:539-50
  12. Norman P, Boer H, Seydel ER. Protection Motivation Theory. In Predicting health behaviour Edited by: Conner M, Norman P. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press, 2005;81-126
  13. Champion VL, Skinner CS. The Health Belief Model. In Health behaviour and health education; theory, research, and practice Edited by: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. San Francisco: CA: Jossey Bass, 2008;45-65
  14. Witte K. Fear as motivator, fear as inhibitor: Using the EPPM to explain fear appeal successes and failures. In The handbook of communication and emotion. Edited by: Andersen PA, Guerrero LK. New York: Academic Press. 1998;423-5