Journals / Namık Kemal Tıp Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

Can Hamstring Tendons be Used as Autografts in Peroneal Tendon Reconstruction? A Cadaveric Study

Peroneal Tendon Rekonstrüksiyonunda Otogreft Olarak Hamstring Tendonları Kullanılabilir mi? Kadavra Çalışması

Pages
188–192
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A positive correlation was found between hamstring tendons (gracilis and semitendinosus) and peroneus longus and brevis tendons in terms of size (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Tendon transfers and autografts can be used in the reconstruction of chronic peroneal tendon tears.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: In this study, 13 hamstring tendons (gracilis, semitendinosus) without macroscopic injury and degeneration from the lower extremity of 13 fresh frozen cadavers were harvested and measured by standard methods.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A positive correlation was found between hamstring tendons (gracilis and semitendinosus) and peroneus longus and brevis tendons in terms of size (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Tendon transfers and autografts can be used in the reconstruction of chronic peroneal tendon tears. This cadaveric study aimed to evaluate the use of autograft hamstring tendons to reconstruct peroneal tendons in terms of diameter suitability. Materials and Methods: In this study, 13 hamstring tendons (gracilis, semitendinosus) without macroscopic injury and degeneration from the lower extremity of 13 fresh frozen cadavers were harvested and measured by standard methods. Then, peroneal tendons (peroneus longus, peroneus brevis) of the same cadavers were harvested and measured by standard methods. Tendon diameters were measured from the middle region of the tendon using a digital micro-caliper. After the measurements were completed, the thickness of the hamstring tendons and both peroneal tendons were statistically evaluated. Results: The mean age of the cadavers included in the study was 74.07±12.25 (minimum: 51, maximum: 94) years, and the mean body mass index was calculated as 25.38±6.07. There was no statistically significant difference by gender in the evaluated tendon diameters (p>0.05 for each). A positive correlation was found between hamstring tendons (gracilis and semitendinosus) and peroneus longus and brevis tendons in terms of size (p

Özet

Amaç: Kronik peroneal tendon yırtıklarının rekonstrüksiyonunda tendon transferleri ve otogreftler kullanılabilir. Bu kadavra çalışmasında peroneal tendonların rekonstrüksiyonu için otogreft hamstring tendonlarının kullanımının çap uygunluğu açısından değerlendirilmesi amaçlandı. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmada 13 (4 kadın, 9 erkek) taze donmuş kadavra alt ekstremitesinden otogreft olarak 13 adet makroskopik yaralanması ve dejenerasyonu olmayan, hamstring tendonları (gracilis, semitendinosus) standart yöntemler ile elde edildi ve ölçüme alındı. Ardından aynı kadavraların peroneal tendonları (peroneus longus, peroneus brevis) standart yöntemler ile elde edilerek ölçüme alındı. Tendon çap ölçümleri tendonların en kalın olduğu orta bölgesinden dijital mikro kumpas yardımıyla yapıldı. Ölçümler sonucunda hamstring tendonları ile her iki peroneal tendon kalınlıkları istatistiksel olarak değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Çalışmaya dahil edilen kadavraların yaş ortalaması 74,07±12,25 (minimum: 51, maksimum: 94) yıl iken vücut kitle indeksi ortalaması 25,38±6,07 olarak bulundu. Çapları değerlendirilen tendonlar ile cinsiyet arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmadı (her biri için p>0,05). Hamstring tendonları (grasilis ve semitendinosus) boyutları ile, peroneus longus ve brevis tendonları arasında pozitif bir korelasyon mevcuttu (her biri için p

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, M., KARAHAN, N., KURDAL, D. P., ÇİÇEK, E. D., YILMAZ, B., KESKİNÖZ, E. N. (2022). Can Hamstring Tendons be Used as Autografts in Peroneal Tendon Reconstruction? A Cadaveric Study. Namık Kemal Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 188–192. https://ajindex.com/articles/584018

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Demetracopoulos CA, Vineyard JC, Kiesau CD, Nunley JA 2nd. Long-term results of debridement and primary repair of peroneal tendon tears. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35:252-7
  2. Heckman DS, Reddy S, Pedowitz D, Wapner KL, Parekh SG. Operative treatment for peroneal tendon disorders. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:404-18
  3. Pelet S, Saglini M, Garofalo R, Wettstein M, Mouhsine E. Traumatic rupture of both peroneal longus and brevis tendons. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24:721-3
  4. Dombek MF, Lamm BM, Saltrick K, Mendicino RW, Catanzariti AR. Peroneal tendon tears: a retrospective review. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2003;42:250-8
  5. Miura K, Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Kusumi T, Toh S. Split lesions of the peroneus brevis tendon in the Japanese population: an anatomic and histologic study of 112 cadaveric ankles. J Orthop Sci. 2004;9:291-5
  6. Sobel M, Bohne WH, Levy ME. Longitudinal attrition of the peroneus brevis tendon in the fibular groove: an anatomic study. Foot Ankle. 1990;11:124- 8
  7. Selmani E, Gjata V, Gjika E. Current concepts review: peroneal tendon disorders. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27:221-8
  8. Nellas ZJ, Loder BG, Wertheimer SJ. Reconstruction of an Achilles tendon defect utilizing an Achilles tendon allograft. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1996;35:144- 8; discussion 190
  9. Turco VJ, Spinella AJ. Achilles tendon ruptures--peroneus brevis transfer. Foot Ankle. 1987;7:253-9
  10. Mook WR, Parekh SG, Nunley JA. Allograft reconstruction of peroneal tendons: operative technique and clinical outcomes. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34:1212-20
  11. Strickland SM, MacGillivray JD, Warren RF. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allograft tendons. Orthop Clin North Am. 2003;34:41- 7
  12. Ellis SJ, Rosenbaum AJ. Hamstring Autograft Reconstruction of the Peroneus Brevis. Techniques in Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2018;17:3-7
  13. Yılmaz B, Özdemir G, Keskinöz EN, Tümentemur G, Gökkuş K, Demiralp B. Comparing Dimensions of Four-Strand Hamstring Tendon Grafts with Native Anterior and Posterior Cruciate Ligaments. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:3795367
  14. Strauss EJ, Campbell K, Bosco JA. Analysis of the cross-sectional area of the adductor longus tendon: a descriptive anatomic study. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:996-9
  15. Krause JO, Brodsky JW. Peroneus brevis tendon tears: pathophysiology, surgical reconstruction, and clinical results. Foot Ankle Int. 1998;19:271-9
  16. Pellegrini MJ, Glisson RR, Matsumoto T, Schiff A, Laver L, Easley ME, et al. Effectiveness of Allograft Reconstruction vs Tenodesis fo