Journals / MN Oftalmoloji / 2015 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

Clinical Features and Surgical Treatment Methods in Malign Eyelid Tumors

Göz Kapaklarının Kötü Huylu Tümörlerinde Klinik Bulgular ve Cerrahi Tedavi Yöntemleri

Pages
111–115
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Cosmetically and functionally satisfactory result were achieved for all patients except one who needed second surgery.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To analyze the clinical features, surgical treatments and outcomes of the patients with malign eyelid tumors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: A retrospective study of the patients with malign eyelid tumors between January 2007 to March 2013 was undertaken, and clinical records including demographic data, clinical characteristics of malign eyelid tumors, localization, surgical method and outcomes were reviewed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Cosmetically and functionally satisfactory result were achieved for all patients except one who needed second surgery.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the clinical features, surgical treatments and outcomes of the patients with malign eyelid tumors. Material and Method: A retrospective study of the patients with malign eyelid tumors between January 2007 to March 2013 was undertaken, and clinical records including demographic data, clinical characteristics of malign eyelid tumors, localization, surgical method and outcomes were reviewed. Results: A total of 27 eyelids of 26 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 59,6±16,5 years. The lower eyelid was involve din 71.4%, upper eyelid in 10.7%, medial canthus in 10.7% and lateral canthus in 7.2%. Basal cell carcinoma was the most common eyelid malignancy (n=24,89.0%) followed by squamous cell carcinoma (n=2,7.4%) and sebaceous gland carcinoma (n=1,3.7%). Reconstruction t echnique was primary repair in 6 eyes (22,2%), Tenzel semicircular flap in 2 eyes (7,4%) and anterior and/or posterior lamellar repair in 19 eyes (70,4%). The mean follow-up was 19,1±11,4 months. Postoperative complications occured in six cases. Among them only one case with ectropion needed a second surgery. Conclusion: Basal cell carcinoma was the most common tumor and anterior and/or posterior lamellar repair was mostly used reconstruction technique in this study. Cosmetically and functionally satisfactory result were achieved for all patients except one who needed second surgery.

Özet

Amaç: Kötü huylu kapak tümörü tanısıyla ameliyat edilen hastaların klinik özelliklerinin, cerrahi tedavi yöntemlerinin ve sonuçlarının değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Ocak 2007- Mart 2013 tarihleri arasında kötü huylu kapak tümörü tanısıyla ameliyat edilen hastaların dosyaları retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Hastaların klinik özellikleri, tanıların dağılımı, tümör yerleşimi, uygulanan cerrahi yöntem ve komplikasyon oranları değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Çalışmaya 26 hastanın 27 gözü dahil edildi. Olguların ortalama yaşı 59,6±16,5 yıldı. Yirmi gözde (%71,4) alt kapak, 3 gözde (%10,7) üst kapak, 3 gözde (%10,7) medyal kantüs ve 2 gözde (%7,2) lateral kantüs tutulmuştu. Patolojik tanı 24 gözde (%89,0) b azal hücreli karsinom, 2 gözde (%7,4) skuamöz hücreli karsinom ve 1 gözde (%3,7) sebase bez karsinomuydu. Gözlerin 6’sında (%22,2) primer tamir, 2’sinde (%7,4) Tenzel semisirküler flep, 19’unda (%70,4) kombine ön ve/veya arka lamel onarımı uygulandı. Ortalama takip süresi 19,1±11,4 ay idi ve altı olguda komplikasyon gelişti, yalnızca bir olguda ikinci bir ameliyat gerektirecek düzeyde ektropiyon izlendi. Sonuç: Bu seride bazal hücreli karsinom göz kapağının en sık görülen malign tümörü, kombine ön ve/veya arka lamel onarımı ise en sık uygulanan rekonstrüksiyon yöntemiydi. Kapak rekonstrüksiyon sonrası bir olgu dışında tüm olgularımızda kabul edilebilir fonksiy onel ve kozmetik sonuç elde edildi.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖNCÜ, T., ÇAKMAK, S., AKAL, A., OĞUZ, H. (2022). Clinical Features and Surgical Treatment Methods in Malign Eyelid Tumors. MN Oftalmoloji, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 111–115. https://ajindex.com/articles/581506

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Kleinstein RN, Lehman HF. Incidence and prevalence of eye can- cer. Am J Optom Physiol Optics 1977;54:49-51
  2. Deprez M, Uffer S. Clinicopathological features of eyelid skin tu- mors. A retrospective study of 5504 cases and review of literature. Am J Dermatopathol 2009;31:256-62
  3. Wang JK, Liao SL, Jou JR et al. Malign eyelid tumors in Taiwan. Eye 2003;17:216-20
  4. Jahagirdar SS, Thakre TP, Kale SM, Kulkarni H, Mamtani M. A clinicopathological study of eyelid malignancies from central India. Indian J Ophthalmol 2007;55:109-12
  5. Cook BE Jr, Bartley GB. Epidemiologic characteristics and clini- cal course of patients with malignant eyelid tumors in an inci- dence cohort in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Ophthalmology 1999;106:746-50
  6. Ho M, Liu DTL, Chong KKL, Ng HK, Lam DSC. Eyelid tumors and pseudotumors in Hong Kong: a ten year experience. Hong Kong Med J 2013;19:150-5
  7. Kandemir NO, Barut F, Bektaş S ve ark. Göz kapağı ve konjonkti- vanın tümörleri ve tümör benzeri lezyonları. Türk Patoloji Dergisi 2009;25:112-7
  8. Soysal HG, Albayrak A. Göz kapaklarının primer malign tümör- leri. T Oft Gaz 2001;31:370-7
  9. Çömez AT, Akçay L, Doğan ÖK. Göz Kapaklarının Primer Kötü Huylu Tümörleri. TJO 2012;42:412-17
  10. Spinelli HM, Jelks GW. Periocular reconstruction: a systematic approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993;91:1017-24
  11. Saito A, Saito N, Furukawa H et al. Reconstruction of periorbital defects following malignant tumor excision: A report of 50 cases. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012;65:665-70
  12. Margo CE, Waltz K. Basal cell carcinoma of the eyelid and peri- ocular skin. Surv Ophthalmol 1993;38:169-92
  13. Hou PK, Tsai YS. Eyelid tumour: a statistical study. Acta Soc Ophthalmol Sin 1977;16:34-6
  14. Lee SB, Saw SM, Eong KGA et al. Incidence of eyelid cancers in Singapore from 1968 to 1995. Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83:595-7
  15. Ni C, Searl SS, Kuo PK et al. Sebaceous cell carcinomas of the ocular adnexa. In: NiC, Albert DM (eds). Tumours of the Eyelid and Orbit: Chinese-American Collaborative Study. Int Ophthal- mol Clin 1982;22:23-61
  16. Kass LG, Hornblass A. Sebaceous carcinoma of the ocular ad- nexa. Surv Ophthalmol 1989;33:477-90
  17. Özkılıç E, Peksayar G. Kapak tümörlerinin epidemiyolojik açıdan değerlendirilmesi. Turk J Ophthalmol 2003;33:631-40
  18. Yalaz M, Varınlı S, Varınlı İ. Oftalmik tümör ve tümör benzeri lezyonların klinikopatolojik değerlendirmesi. Turk J Ophthalmol 1990;20:462-6
  19. Hamada S, Kersey T, Thaller VT. Eyelid basal cel