SavedAdd your journal

Journals / MN Oftalmoloji / 2015 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of the ICare Tonometer with Non-Contact Pneumotonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Healthy Individuals with Different Corneal Thickness: A Prospective Study

Farklı Korneal Kalınlıklı Sağlıklı Bireylerde ICare Tonometresi ile Goldmann Aplanasyon Tonometresi ve Non-Kontakt Pnömotonometrenin Karşılaştırılması: Prospektif Çalışma

Ali AKAL
Tuğba GÖNCÜ
Mehmet Fatih ADIBELLİ
Ömer Faruk YILMAZ
Gülşah GÖRMÜŞ
Funda DİLMEN YÜKSEKYAYLA
Mehmet DÜŞÜNÜR
Kudret ÖZKAN
Pages
85–89
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

After comparison of different methods of IOP measurements, statistically significant differences was observed between the groups (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Investigating the relationship of intraocular pressure values of normal individuals with different central corneal thickness (CCT) by values obtained with Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and non-contact pneumotonometer (NCT) Material and Method: One hundred seventy eyes of 85 patients without any ocular pathology in ophthalmologic examination were enrolled in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For each different device measurements were repeated 3 times and the arithmetic mean was obtained.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:After comparison of different methods of IOP measurements, statistically significant differences was observed between the groups (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Investigating the relationship of intraocular pressure values of normal individuals with different central corneal thickness (CCT) by values obtained with Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and non-contact pneumotonometer (NCT) Material and Method: One hundred seventy eyes of 85 patients without any ocular pathology in ophthalmologic examination were enrolled in the study. Complete eye examinations were performed. Intraocular pressure measurements were performed by three different investigators. Pachymetry, ICare tonometer, NCT and GAT measurements were performed respectively. For each different device measurements were repeated 3 times and the arithmetic mean was obtained. Differences between methods of measurement were assessed by One-Way ANOVA test. The relationships between groups were assessed by Pearson's correlation analysis. The distribution of the difference between IOP was assessed by Blant-Altman analysis. Results: Lowest values of IOP were obtained with GAT, then respectively ICare and NCT gave higher measurements. After comparison of different methods of IOP measurements, statistically significant differences was observed between the groups (p

Özet

Amaç: Farklı santral korneal kalınlığı (SKK) olan normal bireylerde, ICare tonometre ile elde edilen göziçi basınç (GİB) değerleri ile Goldmann aplanasyon tonometresi (GAT) ve non-kontakt pnömotonometre (NKT) ile elde edilen göz içi basınç değerleri arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırmak. Gereç ve Yöntem: Göz muayenesinde oküler patolojisi olmayan 85 hastanın 170 gözü çalışmaya alındı. Hastaların tam göz muayeneleri yapıldı. Göz içi basınç ölçümleri üç farklı araştırmacı tarafından yapıldı. Ölçümler sırasıyla pakimetre, ICare tonometresi, NKT ve GAT ile yapıldı. Her bir farklı cihazın ölçümleri 3 kez tekrarlandı ve aritmetik ortalamaları alındı. Ölçüm metodları arasındaki anlamlılık One-WayAnova testi ile değerlendirildi. Gruplar arası ilişki Pearson korelasyon analizi ile değerlendirildi. Ölçüm yöntemleri arasındaki GİB farklarının dağılımı ise Blant-Altman analizi ile gösterildi. Bulgular: Göz içi basınç ölçümlerinde rakamsal olarak en düşük değerler GAT ölçümleri ile daha sonra NKT ölçümleri ve en yüksek olarak da ICare tonometre ölçümleri ile elde edildi. Farklı göz içi basınç ölçüm yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılmasında gruplar arasın da istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılıklar olduğu tespit edildi (p

🔖

Cite This Article

AKAL, A., GÖNCÜ, T., ADIBELLİ, M. F., YILMAZ, Ö. F., GÖRMÜŞ, G., YÜKSEKYAYLA, F. D., DÜŞÜNÜR, M., ÖZKAN, K. (2022). Comparison of the ICare Tonometer with Non-Contact Pneumotonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Healthy Individuals with Different Corneal Thickness: A Prospective Study. MN Oftalmoloji, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 85–89. https://ajindex.com/articles/581504

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Bhan A, Browning AC, Shah S. et al. Effect of corneal thickness on ocular presure measurements with pneumotonometer, Gold- mann aplanation tonometer and Tonopen. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:1389-92
  2. Whitacre MM, Stein RA, Hassanein K. The effect of cornea lth- ickness on applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 1993; 115:592-6
  3. Recep OF, Hasiripi H, Cagil N, et al. Relation between corneal thickness and intraocular pressure measurement by noncontact and applanation tonometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:178-9
  4. Wolfs RC, Klaver CC, Vingerling JR, et al. Distribution of central corneal thickness and its association with intraocular pressure: the Rotterdam Study. Am J Ophthalmol 1997;123:767-72
  5. Stodtmeister R: Applanation tonometry and correction according to corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1998;76:319-24
  6. Bron AM, Creuzot-Garcher C, Goudeau-Boutillon S, et al. Falsely elevated intraocular pressure due to increased central corneal thickness. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1999;237:220-4
  7. Herndon LW, Choudhri SA, Cox T, et al. Central corneal thickness in normal, glaucomatous, and ocular hypertensive eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:1137-41
  8. Kotecha A. What biomechanical properties of the cornea are rele- vant for the clinician ? Surv Ophthalmol 2007;52:109-14
  9. Aghaian E, Choe JE, Lin S, Set al. Central corneal thickness of Caucasians, Chinese, Hispanics, Filipinos, African Americans and Japanese in a glaucoma clinic. Ophthalmology 2004;111:2211-9
  10. Sarıcaoğlu MS.:Yeni tonometreler ve göz içi basıncı ölçümünde yeni tartışma: korneanın biyomekanik özellikleri. Glo-Kat 2010; 5:67-74
  11. Baykara M, Türüdü S, Zaım N, Ağayarov A,Özçetin H. ICare to- nometresi ve goldmann applanasyon tonometrelerinin klinik ola- rak karşılaştırılması. Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2011;37:89-91
  12. Brown KE, Congdon NG. Corneal structure and biomechanics: impact on the diagnosis and management of glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2006;17:338-43
  13. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Castillo A, et al. Reproducibility and clinical evaluation of rebound tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:4578-80
  14. Iliev ME, Goldblum D, Katsoulis K, et al. Comparison of rebound tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry and correlation with central corneal thickness. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:833-5
  15. Nakamura M, Darhad U, Tatsumi Y, et al. Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types