SavedAdd your journal

Journals / MN Oftalmoloji / 2022 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of Mucociliary Clearance in Patients Undergoing External Dacryocystorhinostomy

Eksternal Dakriyosistorinostomi Uygulanan Hastalarda Mukosiliyer Klirensin Değerlendirilmesi

Şerife Gülhan KONUK
Alper GÜNEŞ
Helin DENİZ DEMİR
Erdinç AYDIN
Mehmet GÜVEN
Hüseyin YARDIM
Ünal ERKORKMAZ
Pages
28–31
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

But it was found that there was no significant difference between the pre-operative mucociliary clearance values and postoperative 1st month clearance values (p=0.188).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Assessment of mucociliary clearance in patients with external dacryocystorhinostomy with bicanalicular silicone tube intubation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: In this study, 29 patients who underwent external dacryocystorhinostomy with bicanalicular silicone tube intubation were reviewed retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:But it was found that there was no significant difference between the pre-operative mucociliary clearance values and postoperative 1st month clearance values (p=0.188).
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Assessment of mucociliary clearance in patients with external dacryocystorhinostomy with bicanalicular silicone tube intubation. Material and Method: In this study, 29 patients who underwent external dacryocystorhinostomy with bicanalicular silicone tube intubation were reviewed retrospectively. Mucociliary clearance values of the patients were recorded by measuring the preoperative and postoperative 1st, 3rd and 6th months. Measurements were compared using Student's t test and p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: 24 (82.8%) of the patients were female and 5 (17.2%) were male, and the mean age was 39.79 ± 10.55 years. The mean followup was 12 months. Mucociliary clearance measurements performed after surgery were found to be shortened compared to preoperative measurement. But it was found that there was no significant difference between the pre-operative mucociliary clearance values and postoperative 1st month clearance values (p=0.188). A statistically significant difference was found between preoperative values and postoperative 3rd and 6th month values (p

Özet

Amaç: Eksternal dakriyosistorinostomi ile beraber bikanaliküler silikon tüp entübasyonu yapılan olgularda mukosiliyer klirensi değerlendirmek. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmada eksternal dakriyosistorinostomi yapılan 29 olgu geriye dönük olarak incelendi. Ameliyat öncesi ve ameliyattan sonraki 1., 3. ve 6. aylarda mukosiliyer klirens değerleri ölçülerek kaydedildi. Ölçümler Student t testi kullanılarak karşılaştırıldı ve p değerinin 0,05’in altında olduğu durumlar istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olarak kabul edildi. Bulgular: Hastaların 24’ü (%82,8) kadın, 5’i (%17,2) erkek olup, yaş ortalaması 39,79±10,55 yıl idi. Ortalama takip süresi ise 12 aydı. Ameliyattan sonra yapılan mukosiliyer klirens ölçümleri preoperatif ölçümle karşılaştırıldığında kısaldığı saptandı. Ancak ameliyat öncesi değerlerle ameliyat sonrası 1. ay klirens değerleri arasındaki fark istatiksel anlamlı değildi (p=0,188). Ameliyat öncesi değerlerle ameliyat sonrası 3. ve 6. ay değerleri arasında ise istatiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark mevcuttu (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KONUK, Ş. G., GÜNEŞ, A., DEMİR, H. D., AYDIN, E., GÜVEN, M., YARDIM, H., ERKORKMAZ, Ü. (2022). Evaluation of Mucociliary Clearance in Patients Undergoing External Dacryocystorhinostomy. MN Oftalmoloji, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1, 28–31. https://ajindex.com/articles/581479

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Munkholm M. Mortensen J. Mucociliary clearance: pathophysiological aspects. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2014;34(3):171-7
  2. Bustamante-Marin XM. Ostrowski LE. Cilia and Mucociliary Clearance. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2017;9(4):a028241
  3. Cohen NA. Sinonasal mucociliary clearance in health and disease. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 2006;196:20-6
  4. Özcan M. Burun anatomisi ve fizyolojisi. Koç C, editör. Kulak Burun Boğaz Hastalıkları ve Baş-Boyun Cerrahisi. Ankara: Güneş Kitabevi, 2004:455-7
  5. Karaman M. Tek M. Deleterious effect of smoking and nasal septal deviation on mucociliary clearance and improvement after septoplasty. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2009;23(1):2-7
  6. Lale AM. Mason JD. Jones NS. Mucociliary transport and its assessment: a review. Clin Otolaryngol. 1998;23(5):388-96
  7. Kleinschmidt EG. Witt G. Evaluation of nasal mucociliary clearance with a modified saccharin test. Laryngorhinootologie. 1995;74(5):286-8
  8. Armengot M. Basterra J. Garín L. Normal values of nasal mucociliary clearance. Comparison of various techniques and substances. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 1990;41(5):333-6
  9. Jawaheer L. MacEwen CJ. Anijeet D. Endonasal versus external dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2(2):CD007097
  10. Velegrakis GA. Prokopakis EP. Panayotaki I. Pagalos AG. Siganos CS. Helidonis ES. Intranasal laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy with the use of a surgicalmicroscope. Am J Otolaryngol. 2002;23(5):272-6
  11. Onerci M. Orhan M. Ogretmenoglu O. Irkec M. Long-term results and reasons for failure of intranasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Acta Otolaryngol. 2000;120(2):319-22
  12. Saatci Ö. Develioğlu ÖN. Külekçi M. Endoskopik Endonazal Dakriyosistorinostomi Ameliyatında Fonksiyonel ve Anatomik Başarının Analizi. KBB-Forum. 2020;19(3):272-7
  13. Çömez AT. Karadağ O. Arıkan S. Gencer B. Kara S. Comparison of transcanalicular diode laser dacryocystorhinostomy and external dacryocystorhinostomy in patients with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Lasers Surg Med. 2014;46(4):275-80
  14. Balikoglu-Yilmaz M. Yilmaz T. Taskin U. ve ark. Prospective comparison of 3 dacryocystorhinostomy surgeries: external versus endoscopic versus transcanalicular multidiode laser. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;31(1):13-8
  15. Yigit O. Kirgezen T. Taskin U. Yener M. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy appears to impair nasal mucociliary clearance. EarNose Throat J. 2011;90(9):23-7