SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Milli Eğitim / 2007 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 176

The Effect of Some Learning Strategies to Attitude and Reading Comprehension Fourth Grade Student in Turkish Lesson in Primary School Students in Turkish Lesson in Primary School Students

İlköğretim Dördüncü Sınıf Türkçe Dersinde Bazı Öğrenme Stratejilerinin Tutum ve Okuduğunu Anlamaya Etkisi

Filiz KAYA
Şükran TOK
Pages
8–17
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the research findings, significant difference was found between experimental and control groups in favor of experimental group in reading comprehension but not in the attitude towards Turkish course.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this experimental research is to determine the effect of attitude and reading comprehension by comparing some learning strategies with traditional teacher centered method in fourth grade Turkish lesson.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Research was carried out according to some learning strategies application in experimental group and traditional teacher centered method in control group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the research findings, significant difference was found between experimental and control groups in favor of experimental group in reading comprehension but not in the attitude towards Turkish course.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this experimental research is to determine the effect of attitude and reading comprehension by comparing some learning strategies with traditional teacher centered method in fourth grade Turkish lesson. Research is designed according to experimental model with pre and post test control group. Research sample composed of students from a elementary school in Altı nözü, Hatay. Research was carried out according to some learning strategies application in experimental group and traditional teacher centered method in control group. The data were collected from the reading comprehension test and Turkish course attitude scale. In research data analysis, independent sample ttest, chi-square test were used. According to the research findings, significant difference was found between experimental and control groups in favor of experimental group in reading comprehension but not in the attitude towards Turkish course.

Özet

Bu deneysel araştırmanın amacı, İlköğretim dördüncü sınıf Türkçe dersinde, bazı öğrenme stratejilerini, geleneksel öğretmen merkezli yöntemle karşılaştırarak bunların okuduğunu anlama ve Türkçe dersine yönelik tutuma etkisini belirlemektir. Araştırma ön test-son test kontrol gruplu deneme modelinde tasarlanmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklemini Hatay İli, Altınözü İlçesine bağlı alt sosyo ekonomik düzeydeki bir ilköğretim okulunun öğrencileri oluşturmuştur. Araştırma deney grubunda bazı öğrenme stratejilerine ve kontrol grubunda ise geleneksel-öğretmen merkezli yöntemlere dayalı olarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmada veriler, okuduğunu anlamaya yönelik başarı testi ve Türkçe dersi tutum ölçeği ile toplanmıştır. Araştırma verilerinin analizinde bağımsız gruplar t testi, Ki-kare analizi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın bulgularına göre, okuduğunu anlama başarı testi puanları açısından deney grubu lehine anlamlı fark görülürken, çalışma gruplarının tutum puanları arasında herhangi bir fark bulunmamıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, F., TOK, Ş. (2022). The Effect of Some Learning Strategies to Attitude and Reading Comprehension Fourth Grade Student in Turkish Lesson in Primary School Students in Turkish Lesson in Primary School Students. Milli Eğitim, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 176, 8–17. https://ajindex.com/articles/581183

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. AKBAYIR, S. (2006) İlköğretim Programlan, (Editör, Kasım Kıroğlu), PegemA Yay, Ankara.
  2. ALGOZZİNE, B.(2002). "Tips for teaching-Mow to tutor with reading comprehension problems", Preventing Scholl Failure, 47,45. ANDERSON, J. R. (1983).
  3. The architecture of cognition, Harvard University Pres, Cambridge,MA. ANDERSON, R. REYNOLDS, R., SCHOLLERT, D.& GOETZ, E. (1977). "Frame Works for comprehending discourse", American Educational Research Journal, 14, 367-381.
  4. BRENT, I. L. (2004).
  5. Further Explorations in Online, Copy and Paste Note Taking: Mixed Method Evidencefor Encoding Effects Associated With imposed Levels of Restriction"Nebraska University (PhD), Nebraska BRUNER, J. S. (1990).
  6. Acts of meaning, Harvard University Pres, Cambridge; MA. CASTEEL,.C. P., ISOM, B.A, JORDAN, K. F. (2000). "Creating confident and competent readers:Transactiönal strategies instruction", intervention İn School and Clinic, 36, 67. CONNOR, C. M., MORRISON, J., PETRELLA, J. N. (2004). "Effective reading comprehension instruction: examining child instruction interactions", Journal of Educational Psychology,00220663,6. DEMİREL, Ö. (2004). Kuramdan Uygulamaya Eğitimde Program Geliştirme, PegemA Yayıncılık,Ankara.
  7. EİLERS, H. L., PİNKLEY, C. (2006). "Reading Improvement", Chula Vista, Spring 206. Vol. 43, Iss. 1; pg. 13,17. ERGİNER, E.(1998)."İlköğretim 3., 4. ve 5. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Okuduğunu Anlama Becerilerinin Değerlendirilmesi", 4. Ulusal Sınıf Öğretmenliği Sempozyumu, Pamukkale Üniversitesi,Eğitim Fakültesi, Denizli. GLAZER, S.M. (1999). "Using KWL folders". Teaching Pre K-8 Norwalk, 29 (4): 106-107.
  8. JARED, E., JARED, A. (1997). "Launching Into Improved Comprehension, integrating The KWL Model into Middle Level Courses" The Technology Teacher. 24. KARASAR, N. (2003).
  9. Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri, Nobel Yaym Dağıtım, Ankara.
  10. KIROĞLU, K. (1995), Anlamlı öğrenme stratejilerinin İngilizce okuduğunu anlamaya etkisi,Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi), Ankara.
  11. KIEWRA, K. A. (1990). "Content and Form Variations in Note Taking: Effects Among Junior Students",Journal of Educational Research, S.83. MCLAUGHLIN, M. (1994). "KWL", ASTC Annual Conference, Oregon: Franklin Institute press NEWBY, T.J., D. A. STEPİCH, J.D. LEHMAN, J.D. RUSSEL (1990). Instructional Technology and Learning, Prentice Hall,U.S.A. O'MALLEY, J.J.,CHAMOT, A.U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition,Cambridge University Press.Cambridge, England. PALKOVİTZ,