SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2

Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematic (STEM) Attitude Levels In Grades 4th - 8th

4 - 8. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Fen, Teknoloji, Mühendislik, Matematik (STEM=FETEMM) Tutumlarının İncelenmesi

Mehpare SAKA
Ganime AYDIN
Selcen GUZEY
Pages
787–802
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

But, grade levels (?2 (sd=4, n=964) = 54.49, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the current study was to adapt science, technology, engineering, mathematic (STEM) attitude scale and to retain whether there was differences or not on the 4-8 grade student's STEM attitude by applying scale on them.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study employed a descriptive survey model and data was collected from 964 students educated at 4th to 8th grades from Istanbul, Denizli, and Antalya and Kahramanmaras cities.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:But, grade levels (?2 (sd=4, n=964) = 54.49, p
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to adapt science, technology, engineering, mathematic (STEM) attitude scale and to retain whether there was differences or not on the 4-8 grade student's STEM attitude by applying scale on them. The study employed a descriptive survey model and data was collected from 964 students educated at 4th to 8th grades from Istanbul, Denizli, and Antalya and Kahramanmaras cities. As data collection tool, STEM attitude scale consisting 28 -items that was developed by Guzey, Harwell and Moore (2014) employed. At the beginning of the research, scale was adapted into Turkish by the researchers and Lisrel870 and SPSS 17 programs were used to analysis of large data set and factor analysis was used to test the adaptation of scale and Mann-Whitney U-Test for Independent Samples and Kruskal Wallis H-Tests for independent samples were employed to test the differences on the level of STEM attitudes of students depending on same demographic variables. As a results of data analysis, the STEM attitude level of students who were not experienced before was at intermediate level. Further, gender, public or private school, education level of parents have no effects on the student's STEM attitudes. But, grade levels (?2 (sd=4, n=964) = 54.49, p

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, 4 - 8. sınıf öğrencilerine yönelik fen, teknoloji, mühendislik, matematik (STEM= FeTeMM) tutum ölçeğinin Türkçe 'ye uyarlanması ve bu öğrencilerin STEM tutum düzeylerinin bazı demografik verilere göre farklılık gösterip göstermediği tespit edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Tarama modelinde olan çalışma, İstanbul, Edirne, Denizli, Antalya ve Kahramanmaraş illerinde 4. -5.- 6.7. ve 8. sınıf düzeyinden 964 öğrenciyle gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmada veri toplama aracı olarak, Guzey, Harwell ve Moore (2014) tarafından geliştirilen ve bu araştırma kapsamında Türkçe 'ye uyarlaması yapılan 28 maddeden oluşan STEM tutum ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Veri analizlerinde Lisrel870 ve SPSS 17 programları kullanılarak, ölçek adaptasyonunda doğrulayıcı faktör analizi, farklılıkların olup olmadığını tespit etmek için Mann Whitney U-Testi (Mann-Whitney U-Test for Independent Samples) ve Kruskal Wallis H-Testi (Kruskal Wallis H-Tests for independent samples) testleri kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre örneklem grubu öğrencilerinin STEM tutum düzeylerinin katılıyorum seviyesinde olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca, öğrencilerin STEM tutum düzeylerinin cinsiyet, özel veya devlet okulu, anne -baba eğitim durumu değişkenleri açısından farklılık göstermediği bulunmuştur. Ancak, sınıf düzeyi (?2 (sd=4, n=964) = 54.49, p

🔖

Cite This Article

SAKA, M., AYDIN, G., GUZEY, S. (2022). Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematic (STEM) Attitude Levels In Grades 4th - 8th. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2, 787–802. https://ajindex.com/articles/580285

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Akgündüz, D., Ertepınar, H., Ger, A. M., Kaplan Sayı, A. ve Türk, Z. (2015). STEM eğitimi çalıştay raporu: Türkiye STEM eğitimi üzerine kapsamlı bir değerlendirme. [The report of STEM education workshop: An assessment on STEM education in Turkey]. Erişim adresi: http://www.aydin.edu.tr/belgeler/IAU-STEM-Egitimi-Turkiye-Raporu-2015.pdf
  2. Baenninger, M. ve Newcombe, N. (1989). The role of experience in spatial test performance: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 20(6), 327-344.
  3. Bagiati, A. ve Evangelou, D. (2009). An examination of web-based P-12 engineering curricular: Issues of pedagogical and engineering content fidelity. 2009 Research in Engineering Education Symposium, 20-23 July 2009,
  4. Palm Cove, Queensland, Australia. Bagiati, A. ve Evangelou, D. (2015). Engineering curriculum in the preschool classroom: the teacher's experience, European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 23(1), 112-128. doi: 10.1080/1350293X.2014.991099 Beane, J. (1995). Curriculum integration and the disciplines of knowledge. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 616-622.
  5. Betz, D. E. ve Sekaquaptewa, D. (2012). My fair physicist? Feminine math and science role models demotivate young girls. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(6), 738-746.
  6. Brown, P. ve Borrego, M. (2013). Engineering efforts and opportunities in the national science foundation's math and science partnerships (MSP) program. Journal of Technology Education. 24(2), 41- 54. Burrows, S., Ginn, D. S., Love, N. ve Williams T. L. (1989). A strategy for curriculum integration of information skills instruction, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 77(3), 245-251.
  7. Büyüközturk, S., Kılıç, Cakmak, E., Akgün, O. E., Karadeniz, S. ve Demirel, F. (2009). Bilimsel arastirma yöntemleri. Ankara:
  8. Pegem Akademi. Capraro, R. M. ve Slough, S. W. (2008). Project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
  9. Chen, X. (2009). Students who study science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in postsecondary education. Stats in Brief. NCES 2009-161. National Center for Education Statistics. Erişim adresi: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED506035.pdf
  10. Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G. ve Steele, C. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1045- 060. doi: 10.1037/a0016239 Childress, V. W. (1996). Does integration tec