SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Megaron / 2020 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2

The Dimensions of the Two Remaining Türbes in Ottoman Hungary: Contributions to the Methods of Ottoman Construction Practices in the Sixteenth Century

Macaristan’da Ayakta Kalan İki Osmanlı Türbesinin Ölçüleri: 16. Yüzyıl Osmanlı Yapım Tekniklerine Katkılar

Gergő Máté KOVÁCS
Péter RABB
Journal
Megaron
Pages
230–239
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For this reason, the dimensions of the Türbe of Gül Baba and the Türbe of Idris Baba,the two Shrines in Hungary that still stand, will be investigated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Despite the fact that during the sixteenth century, the so-called golden age of classical Ottoman architecture, thousands of significantbuildings were constructed, the methods of designing in the classical Ottoman period still raises several unanswered questions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The present paper surveys some features of classical Ottoman designs, the types of drawing documents used by the craftsmen, and the operationof the architectural institutions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For this reason, the dimensions of the Türbe of Gül Baba and the Türbe of Idris Baba,the two Shrines in Hungary that still stand, will be investigated.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Despite the fact that during the sixteenth century, the so-called golden age of classical Ottoman architecture, thousands of significantbuildings were constructed, the methods of designing in the classical Ottoman period still raises several unanswered questions. The present paper surveys some features of classical Ottoman designs, the types of drawing documents used by the craftsmen, and the operationof the architectural institutions. By outlining the dimensions of a specific group of commemorative buildings, the mausolea or türbeserected in Ottoman Hungary, this article aims at providing historical contributions to the evaluation and construction methods of theremaining examples of this building type in Hungary. For this reason, the dimensions of the Türbe of Gül Baba and the Türbe of Idris Baba,the two Shrines in Hungary that still stand, will be investigated.

Özet

16. yüzyıl boyunca klasik Osmanlı mimarisinin ‘altın çağı’ olarak adlandırılan dönemde binlerce önemli bina inşa edilmesine rağmen, klasik Osmanlı dönemi tasarım yöntemlerine ilişkin hala cevaplanmamış birkaç soru olduğu görülmüştür. Bu yazıda, klasik Osmanlı tasarımlarının bazı özellikleri, zanaatkârların kullandığı çeşitli çizim belgeleri ve mimari kurumların işleyişi incelenmektedir. Makale, Osmanlı Macaristanı’nda inşa edilen belirli bir anıtsal yapı türü olan türbelerin boyutlarını ana hatlarıyla açıklayarak, bu tür yapıların günümüze dek kalan örneklerinin değerlendirilmesi ve yapım tekniklerinin anlaşılmasına katkı sağlamayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu nedenle, makalede Macaristan’da halen ayakta duran iki türbenin, Gül Baba Türbesi ve İdris Baba Türbesi’nin boyutları incelenecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOVÁCS, G. M., RABB, P. (2022). The Dimensions of the Two Remaining Türbes in Ottoman Hungary: Contributions to the Methods of Ottoman Construction Practices in the Sixteenth Century. Megaron, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 230–239. https://ajindex.com/articles/579935

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Ágoston, G.–Sudár, B. (2002) Gül Baba és a magyarországi bektasi dervisek (Gül Baba and the Bektashi Dervishes in Hungary), Budapest, Terebess. Daragó, L.–Bakonyi, D. (2015) “Report about the Architectural Survey of the Parish Church of the Settlement of Chiddes,” Periodica Polytechnica Architecture, Number 1, pp. 6-16.
  2. Derman, M.U. (2012) “Hat Sanatında Kullanılan Alet ve Malzemeler” Ed. Özcan, A. R., Hat ve Tezhip Sanatı, Ankara, T.C. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı, p. 229. Develi, H. (ed.) (2002) Sāī Mustafa Çelebi: Book of buildings. Teẓkiretü’l-bünyān and Teẓkiretü’l-ebniye, İstanbul,
  3. Koçbank. Dündar, A. (2008) “Çorum Abdal Ata Zaviyesi,” Ed.: M. M. Söylemez, M. Okumuş and İ. Yiğit (editors) Uluslararası Osmanlı’dan Cumhuriyete Çorum Sempozyumu, Çorum, Çorum Belediyesi Kültür ve Sosyal Müdürlüğü Kent Arşivi, pp.961–991. Fehér, K., Halmos, B. (2017) “A középkori építészet szerkesztési módszerei a hazai szakirodalom tükrében,” (Architectural Design Methods of the Middle Ages by the Hungarian Historiography), Építés – Építészettudomány, Number 3–4, pp. 237–284.
  4. Gerelyes, I. (1994) “A szultáni szeráj művészete a XVI. században (The Art of the Palace of Sultan in the Sixteenth Century),” Ed. Gerelyes, I. (editor) Nagy Szulejmán szultán és kora (Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent and His Age), Budapest, Hungarian National Museum, pp. 22–23.
  5. Gerelyes, I. (2007) “Nakkasháne (naqqāsh̲̲-kh̲̲āna),” Ed. Fajcsák, Gy. (editor) Keleti Művészeti Lexikon (Encyclopedia of Oriental Art), Budapest, Corvina, p. 236. Günay, R. (2016)
  6. Sinan. The Architect and His Works, İstanbul,
  7. YEM Yayın. Hasol, D. (2016)
  8. Ansiklopedik Mimarlık Sözlüğü, İstanbul, YEM Yayın. Horváth, I.–Zsembery, Á. (2008) “Az esztergomi Özicseli Hadzsi Ibrahim-dzsámi kutatása és műemléki bemutatása (The Monumental Presentation of the mosque of Uzičeli Ḥacci Ibrahim Pasha),” Építés – Építészettudomány, Number 1–2, pp.3–41.
  9. İnalcık, H. (1994) “Weights and measures,” Ed. İnalcık, H., Quataert, D. (editors) An Economic and Social History of the Ottoman Empire, 1200–1914,
  10. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  11. Kiss, Zs. E. (2013) “Disturbed Symmetry in Ancient Greek and Roman Architecture,” Makarova, V., Nagy, D. (editors) Symmetry: Art and Science. The Journal of the International Society for the Interdisciplinary Study of Symmetry, Athens, International Society for the Interdisciplinary Study of Symmetry, pp. 184–187.
  12. Kuban, D. (2011) Sinan’s Art and Selimiye, İstanbul, Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları. Necipoğlu