Journals / Medeniyet Medical Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of Safety and Outcomes of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in 1337 Patients at a Single Center

Endoskopik Retrograd Kolanjiopankreatografinin Sonuçları ve Güvenilirliğinin Değerlendirilmesi: Tek Merkezin 1337 Hasta Sonuçları

Pages
290–296
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: We concluded that ERCP, which is currently performed entirely for therapeutic purposes, is safe and lifesaving, with high clinical success rates.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the gold standard treatment for pancreaticobiliary diseases.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and review the outcomes of our experience of ERCP over the past 4 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: We concluded that ERCP, which is currently performed entirely for therapeutic purposes, is safe and lifesaving, with high clinical success rates.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the gold standard treatment for pancreaticobiliary diseases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and review the outcomes of our experience of ERCP over the past 4 years. Method: The clinical records of patients aged 18-104 years who underwent ERCP at our gastroenterology clinic between 2014 and 2018 were included in the study. Data were acquired from the hospital archive system. Results: A total of 1337 patients with a mean age of 60.58±17.96 years. including 775 female, and 562 male cases were included in the study. The patients were in the age groups of 18-30 (n=39), 30-65 (n=694), 65-75 (n=274), 75-85 (n=258), and > 85 (n=72) years. Among them, 28.27% were rated as ASA III-IV on the American Society of Anesthesiologists scale. Although biliary cannulation with standard sphincterotomy was successful in 1303 (97.45%), patients it could not be performed in 34 (2.55%). patients Precut papillotomy was performed in 27 (79.41%) of 34 patients. Furthermore, no complication was observed in 1207 patients (90.27%), whereas 96 patients (7.18%) had minor and major procedure-related and anesthesia-related complications. The 30-day mortality rate was 1.64% (n=22). Conclusion: We concluded that ERCP, which is currently performed entirely for therapeutic purposes, is safe and lifesaving, with high clinical success rates.

Özet

Amaç: Pankreatikobiliyer hastalıkların tedavisinde endoskopik retrograd kolanjio pankreatografi (ERCP) altın standarttır. Çalışmamızın amacı son dört yılda ERCP konusundaki deneyimimizi gözden geçirip, ERCP işleminin güvenilirliğini değerlendirmektir. Yöntem: Çalışmamız, 2014-2018 yıllarında ERCP işlemine alınan 18-104 yaş arasındaki tüm hastaların kayıtlarının retrospektif olarak incelenmesiyle gerçekleştirilmiştir. Gerekli veriye hastanemiz arşiv sisteminden ulaşılmıştır. Bulgular: Toplam 1337 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. 775’i kadın, 562’si erkek, ortalama yaş 60,58±17,96 idi. Hastaların 39’u 18-30 yaş, 694’ü 30-65 yaş, 274’ü 65-75 yaş, 258’i 75-85 yaş, 72’si ise 85 yaş üstü idi. Hastaların 28.27%’si Amerikan Anestezistler Derneğine göre (ASA) III-IV’dü. İşleme alınan hastaların 1303’ünde (%97,45) standart sfinkteretomi başarılı iken 34 (%2,55). hastada başarılı olunmadı Erken kesi papillotomi 34 hastanın 27’sinde (%79,41) gerçekleştirildi. Hastaların 1207’sinde (%90,27) hiçbir komplikasyon görülmezken, 96’sında (%7,18) anestezi ve işlem ile ilişkili minor ve major komplikasyon görülmüştür. Otuz günlük mortalite oranı %1,64 (n=22) olarak bulunmuştur. Sonuç: Tümüyle terapötik amaçlarla uygulanan ERCP’nin yüksek klinik başarısıyla güvenilir ve hayat kurtarıcı olduğu kanaatindeyiz.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAHRAMAN, R., KILIC, E. T., OZDIL, K. (2022). Evaluation of Safety and Outcomes of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in 1337 Patients at a Single Center. Medeniyet Medical Journal, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 3, 290–296. https://ajindex.com/articles/579288

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. ASGE Guidelines: The role of ERCP in disease of of the biliary tract and the pancreas. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:1-8. [CrossRef] 2. Raymondos K, Panning B, Bachem I, Manns MP, Piepenbrock S, Meier PN. Evaluation of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography under conscious sedation and general anesthesia. Endoscopy. 2002;34:721-6. [CrossRef] 3. ASGE Standarts of Practise Committee. Sedation and monitoring of patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures. Gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures. GastrointestEndosc. 1995;42:626-9. [CrossRef] 4. Mariani A, Segato S, Anderloni A, et al. Prospective evaluation of ERCP performance in an Italian regional database study. Dig Liver Dig. 2019 Jan 17. pii: S1590-8658(19)30002-7. [CrossRef] 5. Sugiyama M, Abmi Y. Follow up more than 10 years after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis in young patients. Br J Surg. 1998;85:917-21. [CrossRef] 6. Cohen SA, Kasmin FE, Siegel JH. Do not desert me in my old age. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:906-7. [CrossRef] 7. Beaton HL. Surgical considerations. In: Gelb Aed. Clinical gastroenterology in the elderly. New York: Marcel Dekker. 1996 p.271-82. 8. Sugiyama M, Atomi Y. Endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct Stones in patients 90 years of age and older. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;52:187-91. [CrossRef] 9. Deans GT, Sedman P, Martin DF, et al. Are complications of endoscopic sphincteretomy age related? Gut. 1997;41:545-8. [CrossRef] 10. Vandervoort J, Soetikno RM, ThamTC, et al. Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:652-6. [CrossRef] 11. Silveria ML, Seamon MJ, Porshinsky B, et al. Complication related to Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A comprehensive clinical review. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2009;18:73-82. 12. Finkelmeier F, Tal A, Ajouaou M, et al. ERCP in elderly patients: Increased risk of sedation adverse events but low frequency of Post ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;82:1051-9. [CrossRef] 13. Anderson MA, Fisher L, Jain R, et al. Complications of ERCP. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2012;75(3);467-78. [CrossRef] 14. Galeazzi M, Mazzola P, Valcarcel B, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the elderly: results of a retrospective study and a geriatricians’ point of view. BMC Gastroenterol. 2018;18:38. [CrossRef] 15. Coelho-Prabhu N, Shah ND, Van Houten H, Kamath PS, Baron TH. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: Utilisation and outcomes in a