Journals / Medeniyet Medical Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 1

Comparative Analysis of Maternal and Fetal Outcomes of Pregnancies Complicated and Not Complicated with Hyperemesis Gravidarum Necessitating Hospitalization

Hastanede Yatmayı Gerektiren Hiperemezis Gravidarum ile Komplike Olan ve Komplike Olmayan Gebeliklerin Maternal ve Fetal Sonuçlarının Karşılaştırmalı Analizi

Pages
8–14
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Weightloss during pregnancy was evident in 91.3% of women in the HG group, while none of womenin the control group had weight loss during pregnancy (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To compare maternal and fetal outcomes of pregnancies complicated and not complicated with hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) necessitating hospitalization.Method: A total of 386 women with singleton deliveries between March 2015 and January 2018were included in this retrospective single-center study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Of 386 women, 186 women (mean±SDage: 30.7±5.9 years) who were hospitalized with HG within the first 20 weeks of gestationcomprised the hyperemetic pregnancy group, while 200 women without HG during pregnancyserved as a control group.Results: No significant difference was noted between the HG and control groups in terms ofmaternal characteristics, gestational age (median 38.6 and 39.0 weeks, respectively), type of delivery (normal spontaneous delivery in 78.0% vs 80.0%), fetal gender (female: 53.2% vs 48.5%),birthweight (median 3250 g vs 3275 g) and 5-min APGAR scores (≥7 in 97.3% vs 97.5%, respectively).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Weightloss during pregnancy was evident in 91.3% of women in the HG group, while none of womenin the control group had weight loss during pregnancy (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To compare maternal and fetal outcomes of pregnancies complicated and not complicated with hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) necessitating hospitalization.Method: A total of 386 women with singleton deliveries between March 2015 and January 2018were included in this retrospective single-center study. Of 386 women, 186 women (mean±SDage: 30.7±5.9 years) who were hospitalized with HG within the first 20 weeks of gestationcomprised the hyperemetic pregnancy group, while 200 women without HG during pregnancyserved as a control group.Results: No significant difference was noted between the HG and control groups in terms ofmaternal characteristics, gestational age (median 38.6 and 39.0 weeks, respectively), type of delivery (normal spontaneous delivery in 78.0% vs 80.0%), fetal gender (female: 53.2% vs 48.5%),birthweight (median 3250 g vs 3275 g) and 5-min APGAR scores (≥7 in 97.3% vs 97.5%, respectively). Adverse pregnancy outcomes were also similar between groups including pretermbirth (8.1% vs 11.0%, respectively), SGA (5.9% vs 9.5%), hypertensive disorder (5.4% vs 7.5%),placental abruption (1.1% vs 0.5%,), stillbirth (0.0% vs 0.5%) and GDM (3.8%vs 2.5%). Weightloss during pregnancy was evident in 91.3% of women in the HG group, while none of womenin the control group had weight loss during pregnancy (p

Özet

Amaç: Hastaneye yatarak tedavi gerektiren hiperemezis gravidarum (HG) ile komplike gebelikler ile hiperemezis gravidarum görülmeyen gebeliklerin maternal ve fetal sonuçlarını karşılaştırmak. Yöntem: Tek merkezde yapılan bu retrospektif çalışmaya 2015 Mart ile 2018 Ocak arasında tekil doğum yapan 386 kadın dahil edildi. 386 kadının 186’sı (ortalama±SD yaş: 30,7±5,9 yıl) gebeliğin ilk 20 haftasında hiperemezis gravidarum nedeniyle hastaneye yatırılan kadınlardan oluşurken hiperemezis gravidarum görülmeyen 200 kadın kontrol grubu olarak oluşturdu. Bulgular: HG ve kontrol grupları arasında maternal özellikler, ve sırasıyla gebelik yaşı (ortalama 38,6 ve 39,0 hafta), doğum şekli (normal spontan doğum, %78,0 ve %80,0), fetal cinsiyet (kız, %53,2 ve %4,5), doğum ağırlığı (ortalama 3250 g ve 3275 g) ve 5 dk.’lık APGAR skorları (≥7, %97,3 ve %97,5) farklılık görülmedi. Olumsuz gebelik sonuçları olarak değerlendirilen preterm doğum (%8,1 ve %11,0), SGA (%5,9 ve %9,5), hipertansif hastalıklar (%5.4 ve %7.5), dekolman plasenta (%1,1 ve %0,5) ve GDM (%3,8 ve %2.5) görülme oranları da benzer bulundu. Gebelik sırasında kilo kaybı hiperemezis gravidarum grubundaki kadınların %91,3’ünde görülürken, kontrol grubundaki kadınların hiçbirinde gebelik sırasında kilo kaybı görülmedi (p

🔖

Cite This Article

GUNAY, T., HOCAOGLU, M., BOR, E. D., BILIR, R. A., TURGUT, A. (2022). Comparative Analysis of Maternal and Fetal Outcomes of Pregnancies Complicated and Not Complicated with Hyperemesis Gravidarum Necessitating Hospitalization. Medeniyet Medical Journal, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 1, 8–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/579226

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Verberg MF, Gillott DJ, Al-Fardan N, Grudzinskas JG. Hyperemesis gravidarum, a literature review. Hum Reprod Update. 2005
  2. 11(5):527-39. [CrossRef] 2. London V, Grube S, Sherer DM, Abulafia O. Hyperemesis Gravidarum: A Review of Recent Literature. Pharmacology. 2017
  3. 100(3-4):161-71. [CrossRef] 3. Vikanes ÅV, Støer NC, Magnus P, Grjibovski AM. Hyperemesis gravidarum and pregnancy outcomes in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort - a cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Dodds L, Fell DB, Joseph KS, Allen VM, Butler B. Outcomes of pregnancies complicated by hyperemesis gravidarum. Obstet Gynecol. 2006
  5. 107(2 Pt 1):285-92. [CrossRef] 5. Paauw JD, Bierling S, Cook CR, Davis AT. Hyperemesis gravidarum and fetal outcome. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2005
  6. 29(2):93-6. [CrossRef] 6. Bailit JL. Hyperemesis gravidarium: epidemiologic findings from a large cohort. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Gross S, Librach C, Cecutti A. Maternal weight loss associated with Hyperemesis gravidarium: a predictor of fetal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Kuru O, Sen S, Akbayır O, et al. Outcomes of pregnancies complicated by Hyperemesis gravidarium. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Brown MA, Magee LA, Kenny LC, et al. International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP). Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: ISSHP Classification, Diagnosis, and Management Recommendations for International Practice. Hypertension. 2018
  10. [CrossRef] 10. Koudijs HM, Savitri AI, Browne JL, et al. Hyperemesis gravidarium and placental dysfunction disorders. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016
  11. [CrossRef] 11. Bolin M, Åkerud H, Cnattingius S, Stephansson O, Wikström AK. Hyperemesis gravidarium and risks of placental dysfunction disorders: a population-based cohort study. BJOG. 2013
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Roseboom TJ, Ravelli AC, van der Post JA, Painter RC. Maternal characteristics largely explain poor pregnancy outcome after Hyperemesis gravidarium. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011
  13. [CrossRef] 13. Veenendaal MV, van Abeelen AF, Painter RC, van der Post JA, Roseboom TJ. Consequences of HG for offspring: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2011
  14. [CrossRef] 14. Han Z, Lutsiv O, Mulla S, Rosen A, Beyene J, McDonald SD
  15. Knowledge Synthesis Group. Low gestational weight gain and the risk of preterm birth and low birthweight: a systematic review and