Journals / Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1

Türkiye de para politikasının risk alma kanalları var mı?

Is there a risk taking channel of monetary policy in Turkey?

Pages
55–67
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to these results, it was concluded that low interest rates in Turkish banking system affects risk taking of the banks in the period of 2003q1-2012q3.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper uses data of the Turkish banking sector to investigate whether the stance of monetary policy has an impact on the level of risk of individual bank loans.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Using bank level quarterly data over the period 2003q1-2012q3 a dynamic panel data model is estimated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to these results, it was concluded that low interest rates in Turkish banking system affects risk taking of the banks in the period of 2003q1-2012q3.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper uses data of the Turkish banking sector to investigate whether the stance of monetary policy has an impact on the level of risk of individual bank loans. Using bank level quarterly data over the period 2003q1-2012q3 a dynamic panel data model is estimated. There is a positive relationship between the changes in short- term interest rates and banks risk taking. This result reflects that a decrease in short term interest rates has a positive impact on the loan portfolio via outstanding loans. However, negative relationship was found between the interest rate falling below benchmark rate and the risk taking by banks. The magnitude of this effect decreases in the large scale and high liquidity level of the banks. According to these results, it was concluded that low interest rates in Turkish banking system affects risk taking of the banks in the period of 2003q1-2012q3. These results are important for developing and conducting monetary policy. This study adds to the literature on risk-taking channel by providing evidence from an emerging market. Moreover, benchmark rate obtained by estimating Taylor rule for the above-mentioned period.

Özet

Bu çalışma, Türkiyedeki bankacılık verilerini kullanarak, para politikası duruşunun bankaların bireysel kredi verme risk düzeyleri üzerinde etkisi olup olmadığını araştırmaktadır. Bankaların 2003q1-2012q3 çeyrek yıllık dönemi verileri kullanılarak dinamik panel veri modeli tahmin edilmiştir. Buna göre kısa vadeli faiz oranlarındaki değişim ile bankaların risk yüklemimleri arasında pozitif bir ilişki vardır. Bu sonuçlar kısa vadeli faiz oranlarında bir düşüş olduğunda bankaların geri dönmeyen portföyleri üzerinde olumlu etkisi olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Ancak, gösterge oranının altına düşen faizler ve bankaların risk yüklenimleri arasında negatif ilişki bulunmuştur. Bu etkinin büyüklüğü, büyük ölçekli ve likidite seviyesi yüksek bankalarda düşüktür. Bu sonuçlara göre, 2003q1-2012q3 döneminde Türk bankacılık sisteminde düşük faiz oranları bankaların risk yüklenimlerini etkilediği sonucuna varılmıştır. Bu sonuçlar, para politikası geliştirilmesi ve yürütülmesi için önemlidir. Bu çalışma, risk yüklenim kanalı üzerine gelişmekte olan bir piyasa çerçevesinde ele almaktadır. Ayrıca çalışmada ilgili dönem için gösterge faiz oranı Taylor kuralı çerçevesinde tahmin edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇINAR, M., ADANUR, N. A., KANALICI, H. A. (2022). Türkiye de para politikasının risk alma kanalları var mı?. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1, 55–67. https://ajindex.com/articles/578656

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. ANGELONI, I., E. FAIA, and M. LO DUCA, “Monetary Policy and Risk Taking”, Bruegel Working Papers, No 380, 2010.
  2. ADRIAN, T. and H. S. SHIN, “Liquidity and Leverage,” Journal of Financial Intermediation, 19, 2010, pp.418–437. ALTUNBAŞ, Y., L. GAMBACORTA, and M-I DAVID, “Does Monetary Policy Affect Bank Risk-Taking?” ECB Working Paper Series, No 1166, 2010. ARELLANO M. and S. BOND, “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations”, Review of Economic Studies, 58, 1991, pp. 277–297. BEKAERT, G., M. HOEROVA, and M. Lo DUCBEKAERT, “Risk, Uncertainty and Monetary Policy”, NBER Working Paper No 16397, 2010.
  3. BERNANKE, B. and A. S. BLINDER, “Credit, Money and Aggregate Demand”, American Economic Review, 78(2), 1988, pp. 435-439.
  4. BERNANKE, B., “Emerging from the Crisis: Where Do We Stand?”A Speech at the Sixth ECB Conference, Frankfurt. 2010.
  5. BORIO, C. and H. ZHU, “Capital Regulation, Risk-Taking and Monetary Policy: A Missing Link in the Transmission Mechanism?”. Journal of Financial Stabil- ity, 8, 2012, pp. 236–251. BUCH, C. M., S. EICKMEIER, and E. PRIETO, “Macroeconomic Factors and Mi- cro-Level Bank Risk”, CESifo Working Paper No. 3194, 2010.
  6. DE GRAEVE, F., T. KICK, and M. KOETTER, “Monetary Policy and Financial (In) Stability: An Integrated Micro-Macro Approach”, Journal of Financial Sta- bility, 4(3), 2008, pp. 205-231.
  7. DE NICOLO G., G. DELL’ARICCIA, L. LAEVEN, and F. VALENCIA, “Monetary Policy and Bank Risk Taking”, IMF Staff Position Note, SPN/10/09, 2010.
  8. DELIS M. D. and G. P. KOURETAS (2011), “Interest Rates and Bank Risk Taking”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 35, pp. 840-855.
  9. DOKKO, J., B. DOYLE, M. T. KILEY, J. KIM, S. SHERLUND, J. SIM, and V. H. SKANDER, “Monetary Policy and the Housing Bubble”, Economic Policy, 26, 2011, pp. 237-287.
  10. EICKMEIER, S. and B. HOFMANN, “Monetary Policy, Housing Booms and Finan- cial (Im)Balances”, ECB Working Paper, No. 1178, 2010.
  11. GAGGL, P. and M. T. VALDERRAMA, “Does a Low Interest Rate Environment Affect Risk Taking in Austria?”, Monetary Policy & The Economy, 4, 2010, pp. 32-48.
  12. GAMBACORTA, L., “Monetary Policy and the Risk-Taking Channel, BIS Quarterly Review, December, 2009, pp. 43-53.
  13. IOANNIDOU, V. P., S. ONGENA and J. L. PEYDRÓ, “Monetary Policy, Risk-Taking and Pricing: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment”, European Banking Center Discussion Paper No. 2009–31S, 2009. JIMÉNEZ, G., S. ONGENA, J. L. PEYDRÓ, and J. SAURINA, “Hazardous Times for Monetary