Journals / Maliye Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 176

Determination of Factors Affecting Underemployment in Turkey: Logistic Regression Analysis

Türkiye'de Eksik İstihdam Edilenlerin Ortak Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi: Lojistik Regresyon Analizi

Pages
128–139
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the analysis; being male, being young, being single, having low education level, being a social sciences graduate, living in developed regions and having started to work quite soon have been found to be the common features that increase the likelihood of being underemployed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Underemployment . resulting from the inability to use the labor force correctly and effectively is a type of employment that causes low efficiency in the labor market and in the country's economy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The purpose of this study is to determine the common characteristics of individuals being underemployed in Turkey by using the raw data of Household Labor Force Survey between 2014 and 2017 published by Turkish Statistical Institute.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the analysis; being male, being young, being single, having low education level, being a social sciences graduate, living in developed regions and having started to work quite soon have been found to be the common features that increase the likelihood of being underemployed.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Underemployment . resulting from the inability to use the labor force correctly and effectively is a type of employment that causes low efficiency in the labor market and in the country's economy. The purpose of this study is to determine the common characteristics of individuals being underemployed in Turkey by using the raw data of Household Labor Force Survey between 2014 and 2017 published by Turkish Statistical Institute. In this study, individuals probability of being underemployed is estimated by the logistic regression model. As a result of the analysis; being male, being young, being single, having low education level, being a social sciences graduate, living in developed regions and having started to work quite soon have been found to be the common features that increase the likelihood of being underemployed.

Özet

Eksik istihdam işgücünün doğru ve etkin kullanılamamasındankaynaklanan, işgücü piyasasında ve ülke ekonomisinde verim düşüklüğüneneden olan bir istihdam türüdür. Bu çalışmada, 2014-2017 TÜİK Hanehalkıİşgücü Anket (HİA) ham verileri kullanılarak Türkiye’de eksik istihdamedilen bireylerin ortak özelliklerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmadabireylerin eksik istihdamda olma olasılıkları lojistik regresyon modeli iletahmin edilmiştir. Yapılan analiz sonucunda; erkek olmak, genç olmak,bekâr olmak, düşük eğitim seviyesine sahip olmak, sosyal bilimler mezunuolmak, gelişmiş bölgelerde yaşıyor olmak ve yakın zamanda işe başlamışolmak kategorileri eksik istihdam edilme olasılığını arttıran ortak özelliklerolarak bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖNÜLAÇAN, A., ÜNAL, H. (2022). Determination of Factors Affecting Underemployment in Turkey: Logistic Regression Analysis. Maliye Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 176, 128–139. https://ajindex.com/articles/577892

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Acun, S. ve Güneş, B. (2014), “Türkiye’de 2008 Krizinin Eksik İstihdama Etkileri”, Ekonomik Yaklaşım Dergisi, 25(90), 49-69.
  2. Aktaş, C. ve Erkuş, O. (2009), “Lojistik Regresyon Analizi ile Eskişehir’in Sis Kestiriminin İncelenmesi”, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(16), 47-59.
  3. Al-Ghamdi, A.S. (2002), “Using Logistic Regression to Estimate the Influence of Accident Factors on Accident Severity”, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 34(6), 729-741.
  4. Alpar, R. (2017), Çok Değişkenli İstatistiksel Yöntemler, Ankara:
  5. Detay Yayıncılık. Cam, S. (2012), “Involuntary Part-time Work in Britain: Evidence from Labour Forcer Survey”, Industrial Relations Journal, 43(3), 242-260.
  6. Gallup (2013), Underemployment in the MENA Region: Young People in MENA are in Need of Good Jobs, December. Hosmer, D.W. ve Lemeshow, S. (2013),
  7. Applied Logistic Regression, John Wiley & Sons: New York. Hussmanns, R. (2007), “Measurement of Employment, Unemployment and Underemployment-Current International Standards and Issues in their Application”, Bulletin of Labour Statistics, ILO, Geneva, 1-23.
  8. ILO (1998), Current International Recommendations on Labour Statistics, Geneva. ILO (2010), Underemployment http://www.ilo.org/global/statisticsanddatabases/ statistics-overview-and-topics/underemployment/lang--en/ index.htm (Erişim Tarihi: 13.02.2019)
  9. Kjeldstad, R. ve Nymoen, H. (2012), “Underemployment in a Gender Segregated Labour Market”, Economic and Industrial Democracy, 33(2), 207-224.
  10. Köhler, G. (2006), The Global Stratification of Unemployment and Underemployment, Argentine Center of International Studies Working Papers-Programa Teoría de las Relaciones Internacionales. Kumaş, H. ve Çağlar, A. (2011), “Türkiye’de Kadın Eksik İstihdamını Belirleyen Faktörler: TÜİK 2009 Hanehalkı İşgücü Anketi Ham Verileri ile Cinsiyete Dayalı Bir Karşılaştırma”, Çalışma ve Toplum Dergisi, (2), 249-289.
  11. Lacmanovic S., Burić S.B. ve Tijanić, L. (2016), The Socio-economic Costs of Underemployment, Management International Conference, Pula, Croatia, 1-4 June 2016.
  12. Mathebula, I. (2013), The Determinants of Time-Related Underemployment in South Africa, Pretoria: Statistics South Africa. Niyimbanira, F. (2016), “Characterısatıon of Time-Related Underemployment in a South African Municipality: A Case of Bushbuckrıdge, Mpumalanga Provınce”, Internatıonal Journal Of Socıal Scıences And Humanıty Studies, 8(1),116-132.
  13. Özşuca Ş.T. (2003) Esneklik ve Güvenlik ikileminde Türkiye Emek Piyasası, İmaj Yayıncılı