Journals / Livestock Studies / 2021 / Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 2

The effect of the combination of various training methodologies in horse training on the learning performances of Arabian horses

Pages
66–76
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was concluded that the order of methods is so crucial.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research aims at examining the learning performance of Arabian horses with the use of Join-up, Parelli’s Seven Games, and Clicker methods in combination and separately.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The highest heart rates of the training groups were being during the application of the Join-up method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was concluded that the order of methods is so crucial.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Behavior · Horse · Training

Abstract

This research aims at examining the learning performance of Arabian horses with the use of Join-up, Parelli’s Seven Games, and Clicker methods in combination and separately. In the research, thirty-six Arabian mares were examined and combinations of training methods were applied. Before and after the application of each training method, horses were directed to pass through a narrow-spaces and to walk on a tarp. While applying training methods, stress parameters, behavioral responses, and learning responses of horses were evaluated. The highest heart rates of the training groups were being during the application of the Join-up method. When the Parelli method was performed last, the training duration was 13.3% shorter. In walk on tarp task, the highest success score was in Clicker Method (75%). In the triple combination of training, when the Join-up method was performed last, task success rates decreased (33.3%). However, when the Join-up method was performed first, the success rate was 100%. When Parelli's methods were applied last, conflict behaviors were prevented, all horses learned vocal cues, and trusted their trainers. During the application of the Clicker method, all horses learned vocal cues and trusted their trainers. It was concluded that the order of methods is so crucial.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZBEYAZ, C., DANIŞAN, S. (2022). The effect of the combination of various training methodologies in horse training on the learning performances of Arabian horses. Livestock Studies, Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 2, 66–76. https://ajindex.com/articles/577590

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Beaver, B.V. (2019). Equine behavioral medicine. 65, Academic Press.
  2. Blanchard, S. (2005). The Power of Positive Horse Training. Wiley Publishing. Boivin, X., Lensink, J., Tallet, C., & Veissier, I. (2003). Stockmanship and farm animal welfare. Animal Welfare, 12: 479–492.
  3. Christensen, J.W., Ahrendt, L.P., Lintrup, R., Gaillard, C., Palmed, R., & Malmkvist, J. (2012). Does learning performance in horses relate to fearfulness, baseline stress hormone, and social rank? Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 140: 44– 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2012.05.003
  4. Czycholl, I., Büttner, K., Klingbell, P., & Krieter, J. (2018). An indication of reliability of the two level approach of the welfare assessment protocol for horses. Animals, 8: 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8010007
  5. Dai, F., Costa, A.D., Bonfanti, L., Caucci, C., Martino, G.D., Lucarelli, R., Padalino, B., & Minero, M. (2019). Positive reinforcement-based training for self-loading of meat horses reduces loading time and stress-related behavior. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00350
  6. Dalla Costa, E., Dai, F., Lebelt, D., Scholz, P., Barbien, S., Canali, E., Zanella, A.J., & Minero, M. (2016). Welfare assessment of horses: The AWIN approach. Animal Welfare, 25: 481–488. https://doi.org/10.7120/ 09627286.25.4.481 Dougherty, D.M., & Lewis, P. (1992). Matching by horses on several concurrent variable- interval schedules. Behavioral Processes, 26: 69–76. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/0376-6357(92)90003-V Feng, C.F., Howell, T.J., & Bennett, P.C. (2016). How clicker training works: Comparing reinforcing, marking and bridging hypotheses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 181: 34-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim. 2016.05.012 Fenner, K., McLean, A., & McGreevy, P. (2019). Cutting to the chase: How round-pen, lunging and high-speed liberty work may compromise horse welfare. J Vet Behav Clin Appl Res, 29: 88–94, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2018.05.003
  7. Flannery, B. (1997). Relational discrimination learning in horses. Applied Animal Behavior Science, 54: 267–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(97)00006-3
  8. Fureix, C., Pagès, M., Bon, R., Lassalle, J.M., Kuntz, P., & Gonzalez, G. A. (2009). Preliminary study of the effects of handling type on horses’ emotional reactivity and the human-horse relationship. Behavioral Processes, 82: 202-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2009.06.012
  9. Hall, C., & Heleski, C. (2017). The role of the ethogram in equitation science. Ap