SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kocaeli Tıp Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Morphometric Analysis of Coracoid Process And Glenoid Cavity In Terms of Surgical Approaches: An Anatomical Study

Processus Coracoideus ve Cavitas Glenoidalis’in Cerrahi Yaklaşımlar Açısından Morfometrik Analizi: Anatomik Çalışma

Sibel ÇIRPAN
Goksin Nilufer YONGUC
Mustafa GÜVENÇER
Pages
131–137
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The distance between supraglenoid tubercle ofGC and CP tip was measured as 27.56 ± 3.75 mm.DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The dimensions of theCP may differ according to geographical differences.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:INTRODUCTION: In order to treat the recurrent shoulderdislocations surgically, the coracoid process (CP) transferprocedures are used to restore the native glenohumeralanatomy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study parameters measured by using adigital caliper sensitive to 0.01 mm were as follows: the CP(length, heigth at the root, width at the tip and at the root), theGC (the superoinferior height and the widest antero-posteriordiameter) and from the CP tip to the supraglenoid tubercle ofGC.RESULTS: The mean length and width of the GC and rootwidth, root height, tip width and length of the CP weremeasured as 37.27 ± 3.40 mm, 26.25 ± 3.04 mm, 13.98 ± 1.69mm, 18.59 ± 2.55 mm, 13.95 ± 1.73 mm, 42.36 ± 4.28 mm,respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The distance between supraglenoid tubercle ofGC and CP tip was measured as 27.56 ± 3.75 mm.DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The dimensions of theCP may differ according to geographical differences.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In order to treat the recurrent shoulderdislocations surgically, the coracoid process (CP) transferprocedures are used to restore the native glenohumeralanatomy. The aim of this study is to measure the dimensions ofthe CP and the glenoid cavity (GC) and to evaluate thecorrelation between their measurements.METHODS: Sixty two adult dried human scapulae belongingto the Anatomy Department Laboratory of Dokuz EylulUniversity School of Medicine were examinedmacroscopically. The study parameters measured by using adigital caliper sensitive to 0.01 mm were as follows: the CP(length, heigth at the root, width at the tip and at the root), theGC (the superoinferior height and the widest antero-posteriordiameter) and from the CP tip to the supraglenoid tubercle ofGC.RESULTS: The mean length and width of the GC and rootwidth, root height, tip width and length of the CP weremeasured as 37.27 ± 3.40 mm, 26.25 ± 3.04 mm, 13.98 ± 1.69mm, 18.59 ± 2.55 mm, 13.95 ± 1.73 mm, 42.36 ± 4.28 mm,respectively. The distance between supraglenoid tubercle ofGC and CP tip was measured as 27.56 ± 3.75 mm.DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The dimensions of theCP may differ according to geographical differences.

Özet

GİRİŞ ve AMAÇ: Tekrarlayan omuz dislokasyonlarının cerrahi tedavisinde doğal glenohumeral anatomiyi tekrar oluşturmak için, processus coracoideus (PC) transferi işlemleri kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı PC ve cavitas glenoidalis (CG) boyutlarını ölçmek ve sonuçlar arasındaki korelasyonu incelemektir. YÖNTEM ve GEREÇLER: Bu çalışmada Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Anatomi Anabilim Dalı Laboratuvarı’nda yer alan 62 adet yetişkin insana ait kuru kemik scapula, makroskopik olarak incelendi. CG’in superoinferior yüksekliği ve en geniş anteroposterior çapı, PC’in uzunluğu, kök yüksekliği, ucunun ve kökünün genişliği, ve PC’in ucu ile CG’in tuberculum supraglenoidale arasındaki uzaklıklar 0.01mm’ye duyarlı dijital kumpas kullanılarak ölçüldü. BULGULAR: CG’in ortalama uzunluğu ve genişliği, PC’in kök genişliği, kök yüksekliği, uç genişliği ve uzunluğu sırasıyla 37.27 ± 3.40 mm, 26.25 ± 3.04 mm, 13.98 ± 1.69 mm, 18.59 ± 2.55 mm, 13.95 ± 1.73 mm, 42.36 ± 4.28 mm ölçüldü. CG’in tuberculum supraglenoidale’si ile PC’un ucu arasındaki uzaklık 27.56 ± 3.75 mm ölçüldü. TARTIŞMA ve SONUÇ: PC’un boyutları coğrafi bölge farklılıklarına bağlı değişmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇIRPAN, S., YONGUC, G. N., GÜVENÇER, M. (2022). Morphometric Analysis of Coracoid Process And Glenoid Cavity In Terms of Surgical Approaches: An Anatomical Study. Kocaeli Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 131–137. https://ajindex.com/articles/574866

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Sahajpal DT, Zuckerman JD. Chronic glenohumeral dislocation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2008;16(7):385-98.
  2. Boileau P, Villalba M, Hery JY, Balg F, Ahrens P, Neyton L. Risk factors for recurrence of shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88(8):1755-63.
  3. Burkhart SS, De Beer JF. Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: significance of the inverted-pear glenoid and the humeral engaging Hill- Sachs lesion. Arthroscopy 2000;16(7):677-94.
  4. Gartsman GM, Roddey TS, Hammerman SM. Arthroscopic treatment of anterior-inferior glenohumeral instability: two to five-year followup. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000;82(7):991-1003.
  5. Lo IK, Parten PM, Burkhart SS. The inverted pear glenoid: an indicator of significant glenoid bone loss. Arthroscopy 2004;20(2):169-74.
  6. Churchill RS, Brems JJ, Kotschi H. Glenoid size, inclination, and version: an anatomic study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001;10(4):327-32.
  7. Hovelius L, Akermark C, Albrektsson B, et al. Bristow-Latarjet procedure for recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder: a 2-5 year follow- up study on the results of 112 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 1983;54(2):284-90.
  8. Itoi E, Lee SB, Berglund LJ, Berge LL, An KN. The effect of a glenoid defect on anteroinferior stability of the shoulder after Bankart repair: a cadaveric study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000;82(1):35-46.
  9. Ikemoto RY, Murachovsky J, Strose E, Nascimento LG, Bueno RS, Almeida LH. Recurrent shoulder dislocation: aspects between the first episode and surgical treatment. Rev Bras Ortop 2009;44(6):524-8. Latarjet M. [Treatment of recurrent dislocation of the shoulder]. Lyon Chir 1954;49(8):994-7.
  10. Dumont GD, Fogerty S, Rosso C, Lafosse L. The arthroscopic Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability: 5-year minimum follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42:2560–6.
  11. Giles JW, Degen RM, Johnson JA, Athwal GS. The Bristow and Latarjet procedures: why these techniques should not be considered synonymous. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96:1340–8.
  12. Yamamoto N, Muraki T, An KN, Sperling JW, Cofield RH, Ltoi E, et al. The stabilizing mechanism of the Latarjet procedure: a cadaveric study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95:1390–7.
  13. Kleist KD, Freehill MQ, Hamilton L, Buss DD, Fritts H. Computed tomography analysis of the coracoid process and anatomic structures of the shoulder after arthroscopic coracoid decompression: a cadaveric study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007;16(2):245–50. 1. 15.MacLennon RN. Interra