Journals / Kocaeli Tıp Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: Ek 1

Examination of Stress Levels and Sources of Surgical Nurses Caring for COVID-19 Patients

Covid-19 Hastalarına Bakım Veren Cerrahi Hemşirelerinin Stres Düzeyleri ve Kaynaklarının İncelenmesi

Pages
85–93
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the variable of caring for the patient with COVID-19, a significant difference was found in terms of the perception of stress annoyance, which is the sub-dimension of the scale (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:INTRODUCTION: This study; It was conducted to examine the stress levels and sources of surgical nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic process.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS: This descriptive and cross-sectional study; Turkey's Kocaeli working in the surgical unit at the provincial n = 124 nurses was conducted between 11-26 January 2021 with the participation of date.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the variable of caring for the patient with COVID-19, a significant difference was found in terms of the perception of stress annoyance, which is the sub-dimension of the scale (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2021 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study; It was conducted to examine the stress levels and sources of surgical nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic process. METHODS: This descriptive and cross-sectional study; Turkey's Kocaeli working in the surgical unit at the provincial n = 124 nurses was conducted between 11-26 January 2021 with the participation of date. Personal Information Form and Perceived Stress Scale were used in data collection, data analysis was performed with SPPS 25.0 IBM statistical package program. RESULTS: It was determined that 52.4% of the surgical nurses included in the study were between the ages of 39-45, 89.5% were female, 39.5% were undergraduate, 65% were married. It was determined that 54% of the participants had been working for 15 years or more, 62.9% were operating room nurses and 79% were providing care to patients with COVID-19. It was determined that the average score obtained from the Perceived Stress Scale-14 was 3.40 ± 0.32. According to the variable of caring for the patient with COVID-19, a significant difference was found in terms of the perception of stress annoyance, which is the sub-dimension of the scale (p

Özet

GİRİŞ ve AMAÇ: Bu çalışma; COVİD-19 pandemi sürecinde cerrahi hemşirelerinin stres düzeyleri ve kaynaklarının incelenmesi amacıyla yapıldı. YÖNTEM ve GEREÇLER: Tanımlayıcı ve kesitsel tipte yapılan bu araştırma; Türkiye’nin Kocaeli ilinde cerrahi birimlerde çalışan n=124 hemşirenin katılımı ile 11-26 Ocak 2021 tarihleri arasında gerçekleştirildi. Veri toplamada Kişisel Bilgi Formu ve Algılanan Stres Ölçeği kullanıldı, veri analizi SPPS 25.0 IBM istatistik paket programı ile yapıldı. BULGULAR: Araştırma kapsamına alınan cerrahi hemşirelerinin %52.4’ü 39-45 yaş aralığında, %89.5’inin kadın, %39.5’inin lisans mezunu, %65’inin evli olduğu belirlendi. Katılımcıların %54’ü 15 yıl ve daha fazla süredir çalışmakta, %62.9’u ameliyathane hemşiresi, %79’u COVID-19’lu hastaya bakım vermekte olduğu belirlendi. Algılanan Stres Ölçeği-14’ten alınan puan ortalamasının 3.40±0,32 olduğu belirlendi. COVID19’lu hastaya bakım verme değişkenine göre ölçeğin alt boyutu olan stres rahatsızlık algısı bakımından anlamlı fark bulundu (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇINAR, F., ES, M., BÜLBÜLOĞLU, S. (2022). Examination of Stress Levels and Sources of Surgical Nurses Caring for COVID-19 Patients. Kocaeli Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: Ek 1, 85–93. https://ajindex.com/articles/574699

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Pleasure SJ, Green AJ, Josephson SA. The spectrum of neurologic disease in the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic infection: neurologists move to the frontlines. JAMA neurology, 2020;77(6):679- 680
  2. World Health Organization. (2020). WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. (Son erişim tarihi Şubat 9, 2020)
  3. Zhang J, Xie, B. Hashimoto K. Current status of potential therapeutic candidates for the COVID-19 crisis. Brain Behav Immun. 2020; 87: 59-73. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.04.046 4. Chick RC, Clifton GT, Peace KM, et al. Using Technology to Maintain the Education of Residents During the COVID-19 Pandemic [published online ahead of print, 2020 Apr 3]. J Surg Educ. 2020;S1931-7204(20)30084-2. Doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.03.018 5. Potts JR 3rd. Residency and Fellowship Program Accreditation: Effects of the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic [published online ahead of print, 2020 Apr 3]. J Am Coll Surg. 2020;S1072-7515(20)30299- 4. Doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.03.026 6. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395:497-506
  4. Khan S, Ali A, Siddique R, Nabi G. Novel coronavirus is putting thewhole world on alert. JHospInfect. 2020.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2020.01.01 9 8. Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, et al. Epidemiolog ical and clinicalcharacteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumoniain Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):507-513 9. Chen Q, Liang M, Li Y, Guo J, Fei D, Wang, L, et al. Mental health care for medical staff in China during the COVID-19 outbreak. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7:e15- e16. doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30078-X 10. Lai J, Ma S, Wang Y, Cai Z, Hu J, Wei N, et al. Factors associated with mental health outcomes among health care workers exposed to coronavirus disease 2019. JAMA Network Open.2020;3(3):e203976.doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3976
  5. Hiçdurmaz D, Üzar Özçetin YS. COVID-19 Pandemisinde Ön Safta Çalışan Hemşirelerin Ruhsal Sağlığının Korunması ve Ruhsal Travmanın Önlenmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi. 2020; 7(Özel Sayı):1-7
  6. Cohen S, Kamarck T and Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav 1983; 24: 385–96
  7. Eskin M, Harlak H, Demirkıran F, Dereboy Ç. Algılanan stres ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması: güvenirlik ve geçerlik analizi. In New/Yeni Symposium Journal. 2013; 51(3):132-40
  8. Barlas G. İstanbul ili hemod