Journals / Kocaeli Tıp Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

The Importance of Percutaneous Cholecystostomy Placement Time in Patients with Grade-III Acute Cholecystitis

Grade-III Akut Kolesistitli Hastalarda Perkütan Kolesistostomi Yerleştirme Zamanının Önemi

Pages
172–179
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: According to our study results, we strongly recommend that the procedure be applied to the required patients within the first 72 hours by making a quick decision on the implantation of a PC in a multidisciplinary manner.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The current treatment modality for acute cholecystitis is laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Based on this problem, the aim of our study is to determine the effects of percutaneous cholecystostomy placed in the early (first 72 hours) or late (72 hours and later) periods, on mortality and morbidity, in patients with Grade III acute cholecystitis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: According to our study results, we strongly recommend that the procedure be applied to the required patients within the first 72 hours by making a quick decision on the implantation of a PC in a multidisciplinary manner.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The current treatment modality for acute cholecystitis is laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In some cases, it may be necessary to use alternative methods such as percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC), especially in grade III patients. Based on this problem, the aim of our study is to determine the effects of percutaneous cholecystostomy placed in the early (first 72 hours) or late (72 hours and later) periods, on mortality and morbidity, in patients with Grade III acute cholecystitis. Method: Patients with acute cholecystitis treated between January 2012 and December 2018 were evaluated. The patients were divided into 2 groups as the group with PC placement in the first 72 hours of the symptoms started (Group-I, n= 19) and the group with PC placement after 72 hours (Group-II, n=13). Results: A total of 32 patients with grade III acute cholecystitis who underwent percutaneous cholecystostomy between this period were included in the study. Early morbidity was observed in 7 (21.87%) patients, while hospital mortality was observed in 11 patients (34.37%). While there was no significant difference in morbidity between early PC (first 72 hours, Group-I) and late PC (72. hour and later, Group-II) in patients with grade III acute cholecystitis (p=0.67), there was a significant difference in mortality in Group-II compared to Group-I ( p=0.001). Conclusion: According to our study results, we strongly recommend that the procedure be applied to the required patients within the first 72 hours by making a quick decision on the implantation of a PC in a multidisciplinary manner.

Özet

Giriş: Akut kolesistit için güncel tedavi yöntemi laparoskopik kolesistektomidir. Bazı durumlarda özellikle de Grade III hastalarda perkütan kolestostomi (PK) gibi alternatif yöntemlerin kullanılması gerekebilir. Bu sorundan yola çıkarak çalışmamızın amacı, Grade III akut kolesistitli hastalarda erken (ilk 72 saat) veya geç (72 saat ve sonrası) dönemlerde uygulanan perkütan kolestostominin mortalite ve morbidite üzerine etkilerini belirlemektir. Yöntem: Ocak 2012 ile Aralık 2018 arasında tedavi edilen akut kolesistitli hastalar değerlendirildi. Hastalar semptomların başladığı ilk 72 saatte PK yerleştirilen grup (Grup-I, n = 19) ve 72 saat sonra PK yerleştirilen grup (Grup-II, n = 13) olarak 2 gruba ayrıldı. Bulgular: Bu dönem arasında perkütan kolestostomi uygulanan Grade-III akut kolesistitli hastalar çalışmaya dahil edildi. Erken morbidite 7 hastada (% 21.87), hastane mortalitesi 11 hastada (% 34.37) gözlendi. Grade-III akut kolesistitli hastalarda erken PK (ilk 72 saat, Grup-I) ve geç PK (72. saat ve sonrası, Grup-II) arasında morbidite açısından anlamlı bir fark gözlenmez iken (p = 0.67), Grup-II’ ye göre Grup-II’ de mortalitede istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık saptanmıştır (p = 0,001). Sonuç: Çalışma sonuçlarımıza göre PK yerleştirilmesinin multidisipliner verilen karar ile hızlı bir şekilde ilk 72 saat içinde gerekli hastalara uygulanmasını şiddetle tavsiye ediyoruz.

🔖

Cite This Article

PİŞKİN, E., ÖTER, V., ÇOLAKOĞLU, M. K., ÜSTÜNER, M. A., ÖZGÜN, Y. M., AYDIN, O., BOSTANCI, E. B. (2022). The Importance of Percutaneous Cholecystostomy Placement Time in Patients with Grade-III Acute Cholecystitis. Kocaeli Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 172–179. https://ajindex.com/articles/574636

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Ambe P, Weber SA, Christ H, Wassenberg D. Cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. How timecritical are the socalled “golden 72 hours”? Or better “golden 24 hours” and “silver 25–72 hour”? A case control study. World J Emerg Surg. 2014;9(1):60
  2. Sekimoto M, Takada T, Kawarada Y, Nimura Y, Yoshida M, Mayumi T, et al. Need for criteria for the diagnosis and severity assessment of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis: Tokyo Guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2007;14(1):11–4
  3. Kiriyama S, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Solomkin JS, Mayumi T, Pitt HA et al. TG13 guidelines for diagnosis and severity grading of acute cholangitis (withvideos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013;20(1):24–34
  4. Ambe PC, Kaptanis S, Papadakis M, Weber SA, Zirngibl H. Cholecystectomy vs. percutaneous cholecystostomy for the management of critically ill patients with acute cholecystitis: a protocol for a systematic review. Systematic Reviews. 2015;4:77
  5. Yokoe M, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Solomkin JS, Mayumi T, Gomi H, et al. New diagnostic criteria and severity assessment of acute cholecystitis in revised Tokyo guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2012;19:578–85. 6.Yokoe M, Hata J, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Asbun HJ. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018;25:41–54. 7.Gilliland TM, Traverso LW. Modern standards for comparison of cholecystectomy with alternative treatments for symptomatic cholelithiasis with emphasis on long-term relief of symptoms. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990;170:39-44
  6. Stanek A, Dohan A, Barkun J, Barkun A, Reinhold C, Valenti D et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy: a simple bridge to surgery or an alternative option for the management of acutecholecystitis? Am j surg 2018:01;027 9. Morales-Mazaa J, Rodríguez-Quinteroa J.H, Santesa O, Hernández-Villegas A.C, ClementeGutiérreza U, Sánchez-Moralesa G.E. Percutaneous cholecystostomy as treatment for acute cholecystitis: What has happened over the last five years? A literature review. Revista de Gastroenterología de México. 2019;84(4):482-491
  7. R Peters, Kolderman S, Peters B, Simoens M, Braak S. Percutaneous cholecystostomy: single centre experience in 111 patients with an acute cholecystitis. JBR-BTR. 2014;97:197-201
  8. Viste A, Jensen D, Angelsen JH, Hoem D. Percutaneous cholecystostomy in acute cholecystitis: a retrospective analysis of a large series of 104 patients. BMC Surg. 2015;15:17
  9. Popowicz A,