Journals / Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni / 2015 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2

The reliability and validity of the Turkish Version of Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (Turkish PCL-R)

Pages
118–124
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Pearson correlation coefficient of test-retest was r=0.94 (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Psychopathy is a distinct personality organization and differs from antisocial personality disorders in many aspects.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Our aim was to demonstrate the reliability and validity of PCL-R in a sample from Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Pearson correlation coefficient of test-retest was r=0.94 (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: Psychopathy is a distinct personality organization and differs from antisocial personality disorders in many aspects. Its diagnosis is challenging but also critical to predict criminality. In this context, Psychopathy Checklist Revised (PCL-R) is a useful tool in the diagnosis of psychopathy. Its reliability and validity was shown in various populations but has not been studied in a Turkish population. Our aim was to demonstrate the reliability and validity of PCL-R in a sample from Turkey. Methods: 425 male subjects with antisocial personality disorder and 125 controls without any psychiatric diagnoses were included in the study. DSM-5 diagnostic criteria were used and PCL-R was administered to all participants. The reliability of the Turkish version of PCL-R was determined by test-retest and internal consistency methods. In the ROC analysis performed with PCL-R, DSM-5 criteria were taken as a gold standard, the sensitivity; specificity and cut-off values of PCL-R were estimated. To evaluate the adequacy of the scale construct validity, Exploratory Factor Analysis and Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Barlett tests were applied. Reproducibility of the test was evaluated by Pearson correlation coefficient. Re-testing was performed with 171 subjects two weeks after the first test. Results: In reliability analysis, the Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient was calculated to be ?=0.977. Pearson correlation coefficient of test-retest was r=0.94 (p

🔖

Cite This Article

SEMİZ, U. B., EBRİNC, S., ATES, M. A., GUNAY, H., TÜTÜNCÜ, R., BALİBEY, H., OGE, C., CETİN, M., BASOGLU, C., KİLİC, S., ALGUL, A. (2022). The reliability and validity of the Turkish Version of Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (Turkish PCL-R). Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2, 118–124. https://ajindex.com/articles/574399

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders, in Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, American Psychiatric Association, 5th ed. Washington, DC: 2013. pp. 761-81
  2. Hare RD. The Hare PCL-R: some issues concerning its use and misuse. Legal Criminol Psychol 1998;3(1):99-119. [CrossRef] 3. Hare RD. Psychopaths: new trends in research. Harv Mental Health Lett 1995;12:4-5
  3. Konrad N, Prisons as new asylums. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2002;15:583-7. [CrossRef] 5. Hemphill JF, Templeman R, Wong S, Hare RD. Psychopathy and crime: recidivism and criminal careers. In Psychopathy: Theory, Research and Implications for Society, Cooke DJ, Forth AE, Hare RD (editors). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998. pp. 375-99. [CrossRef] 6. Harris GT, Rice ME, Cormier CA. Psychopathy and violent recidivism. Law Hum Behav 1991;15(6):625-37. [CrossRef] 7. Morana HCP, Arboleda-Flórez J, Camara FP. Identifying the cut-off score for the PCL-R scale (psychopathy checklistrevised) in a Brazilian forensic population. Forensic Science International 2005;147(1):1-8. [CrossRef] 8. Babiak P, Hare RD. Snakes in Suits: When psychopaths go to work, New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 2006. p. 25
  4. Hare RD, Manual for the Hare Psychopathy ChecklistRevised. Multi-Health System, Toronto, 1991
  5. Hare RD, Harpur TJ, Hakstian AR, Forth AE, Hart SD, Newman JP. The Revised Psychopathy Checklist: Reliability and factor structure. Psychological Assessment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1990;2(3):338-41. [CrossRef] 11. Gacono CB, Hutton HE. Suggestions for the clinical and forensic use of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R). International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 1994;17(3):303-17. [CrossRef] 12. Cooke DJ. Psychopathic disturbance in the Scottish prison population; The cross-cultural generalizability of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist. Psychology, Crime and Law 1995;2(2):101-18. [CrossRef] 13. Haapasalo J, Pulkkinen L. The Psychopathy Checklist and non-violent offender groups. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health 1992;2:315-28
  6. Koivisto H, Haapasalo, J. Childhood maltreatment and adulthood psychopathy in light of file-based assessments among mental state examinees. Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention 1996;5:91-104
  7. Rice ME, Harris GT. Violent recidivism: Assessing predictive validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1995;63(5):737-48. [CrossRef] 16. Wilson MJ, Abramowitz C, Vasilev G, Bozgunov K, Vassileva J. Psychop