Journals / Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni / 2009 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3

Gelişimsel kekemeliğe tedavi yaklaşımları: Çocuk psikiyatristlerinin bakış açıları

The management of developmental stuttering: Child psychiatrists' perspectives

Pages
247–254
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is important that child psychiatrists work in extensive collaboration with speech pathologists for treating developmental stuttering.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Stuttering is a communication disorder generally characterized by involuntary disruptions in the flow of speech.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This nationwide survey of child psychiatrists was conducted to assess child psychiatrists views about management approaches to developmental stuttering.Method: Data obtained from 38 respondents who were the child psychiatry specialists using a specific questionnaire including items formatted as multiple- choice questions and a case scenario with a hypothetical frame.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is important that child psychiatrists work in extensive collaboration with speech pathologists for treating developmental stuttering.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Stuttering is a communication disorder generally characterized by involuntary disruptions in the flow of speech. Various theories have been offered to explain developmental stuttering, but its causes are not well understood. There is no known cure for developmental stuttering, though many treatment approaches help children reduce the number of dysfluencies in their speech. There is no common consensus on approaches and attitudes of professionals towards management of developmental stuttering. This nationwide survey of child psychiatrists was conducted to assess child psychiatrists views about management approaches to developmental stuttering.Method: Data obtained from 38 respondents who were the child psychiatry specialists using a specific questionnaire including items formatted as multiple- choice questions and a case scenario with a hypothetical frame. Descriptive analysis was applied to the data. Results: Of the child psychiatrists, 43.3% agreed that early developmental stuttering should be ignored. 65.7% of them preferred at least initially, a wait and see strategy. An appreciable majority of the child psychiatrists were in favor of the indirect therapy, which is aimed primarily at the parents. Sedative antihistamines and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were preferred frequently used as first-choice drug class (36.8% and 34.2%, respectively) while risperidone was prescribed as a first- choice drug by 15.8 percent. Most of the child psychiatrists were not familiar with anti-stuttering devices, and alternative medicine was considered as non-effective and not helpful. Discussion: Child psychiatrists show a heterogeneous picture regarding their views on therapeutic approaches in developmental stuttering. Child psychiatrists in Turkey prefer more conservative approaches. It is important that child psychiatrists work in extensive collaboration with speech pathologists for treating developmental stuttering.

Özet

Amaç: Kekemelik, genellikle konuşmanın akışında aksamaların olduğu bir iletişim bozukluğudur. Gelişimsel kekemeliğin nedenlerine yönelik birçok kuram ileri sürülmesine karşın, yeterince açıklama getirilememiştir. Gelişimsel kekemeliğin kesin tedavisi yoktur, tedavi yaklaşımlarının çoğu konuşma akıcılığındaki düzensizliklerin azaltılmasına yardımcı olmaya yöneliktir. Gelişimsel kekemeliğin tedavisine yönelik profesyonellerin yaklaşım ve tutumlarında fikir birliği yoktur. Bu çalışmada, gelişimsel kekemeliğe yönelik tedavi yaklaşımları hakkındaki ülkemizdeki çocuk psikiyatrisi uzmanlarının görüşlerinin araştırılması amaçlanmıştır.Yöntem: Veriler 38 çocuk psikiyatri uzmanına, çok seçenekli sorular ve varsayımsal çerçevede vaka senaryosu içeren anket uygulanarak elde edilmiştir. Verilere tanımlayıcı analiz uygulanmıştır.Bulgular: Çocuk psikiyatristlerinin %43.3ü okul öncesi dönemde gelişimsel kekemeliğe müdahale edilmemesi görüşündeydi. %65.7i en azından başlangıçta bekle ve gör stratejisini tercih ediyordu. Çocuk psikiyatristlerinin büyük bir kısmı, birincil olarak anne-babanın hedeşendiği dolaylı müdahale lehinde görüş bildirdi. Sedatif antihistaminikler ve seçici serotonin geri alım inhibitörleri sık olarak tercih edilen ilk seçenek ilaçlardı (sırasıyla %36.8 ve %34.2). Risperidon ise %15.8 oranında ilk seçenek olarak tercih ediliyordu. Çocuk psikiyatristlerin çoğu, akıcı konuşmayı destekleyici aygıtlara aşina değillerdi ve alternatif tıp yaklaşımlarının etkisiz oldukları görüşündeydiler.Tartışma: Gelişimsel kekemeliğin tedavi yaklaşımlarına yönelik çocuk psikiyatristlerinin görüşleri heterojen tablo sergilemektedir. Türkiyedeki çocuk psikiyatristleri daha konservatif tedavi yaklaşımlarını tercih etmektedir. Gelişimsel kekemeliğin tedavisinde çocuk psikiyatristlerinin konuşma terapistleri ile yoğun işbirliği önemlidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DURUKAN, İ., ÇİYİLTEPE, M., CÖNGÖLOĞLU, A., KARABEKİROĞLU, K., TÜRKBAY, T. (2022). Gelişimsel kekemeliğe tedavi yaklaşımları: Çocuk psikiyatristlerinin bakış açıları. Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3, 247–254. https://ajindex.com/articles/574258

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Bloodstein O. A Handbook on Stuttering. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group, 1995
  2. Finn P. Establishing the validity of recovery from stuttering without formal treatment. J Speech Hear Res 1996; 39:1171-1181 3. Yairi E, Ambrose NG. Early childhood stuttering: I. persistency and recovery rates. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1999; 42:1097-1112 4. Bothe AK, Davidow JH, Bramlett RE, Ingham RJ. Stuttering treatment research 1970-2005: I. systematic review incorporating trial quality assessment of behavioral, cognitive, and related approaches. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2006;15:321-341 5. Bothe AK, Davidow JH, Bramlett RE, Franic DM, Ingham RJ. Stuttering treatment research 1970-2005: II. systematic review incorporating trial quality assessment of pharmacological approaches. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2006; 15:342-352 6. Yairi E, Carrico DM. Early childhood stuttering pediatricians' attitudes and practices. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 1992; 1:54-62 7. Ingham J C, Riley G. Guidelines for documentation of treatment efficacy for young children who stutter. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1998; 41:753-770 8. Ansel B. Treatment efficacy research in stuttering. J Fluency Disord 1993; 18:121-123 9. Conture EG. Treatment efficacy: stuttering. J Speech Hear Res 1996; 39:18-26 10. Thomas C, Howell P. Assessing efficacy of stuttering treatments. J Fluency Disord 2001; 26:311-333 11. Ingham R J. Spontaneous remission of stuttering: when will the emperor realize he has no clothes on? In: Prins D., Ingham R.J., editors. Treatment of Stuttering In Early Childhood: Methods and Issues. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press, 1983; p.113-140 12. Ingham RJ, Cordes AK. On watching a discipline shoot itself in the foot: some observations on current trends in stuttering treatment. In: Ratner NB, Healey EC, editors. Stuttering Research and Practice: Bridging the Gap. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1999; p.211-230 13. Ezrati-Vinacour R, Platzky R, Yairi E. The young child's awareness of stuttering-like disfluency. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2001; 44:368-380 14. Ingham R J. Stuttering. In: Bellack AS, Hersen M, Kazdin AE, editors. International Handbook of Behavior Modification and Therapy (2nd ed.). New York: Plenum Press. 1990; p.599-631 15. Bloodsteln O. A Handbook on Stuttering (4th ed.). Chicago: National Easter Seal Society, 1987 16. Yaruss JS, Coleman C, Hammer D. Treating preschool children who stutter: description and preliminary evaluation of a family-focused treatment approach. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2006;