Antisosyal kişilik bozukluklarında olaya ilişkin potansiyeller ve saldırganlık

Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In this study, we measured event related potentials (ERPs) in a male sample of antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) patients who were free of substance and alcohol abuse and compared them with those of normal subjects.

📊

Key Findings & Data:Materials and Method: A total of 42 ASPD patients and a control group of 44 healthy subjects were enrolled in the study.

💡

Conclusion & Impact:P3 amplitude (AP3) values were significantly lower in the ASPD group compared to the controls (p

🔬Design:Research Article

📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample

⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we measured event related potentials (ERPs) in a male sample of antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) patients who were free of substance and alcohol abuse and compared them with those of normal subjects. We also aimed to determine whether or not there was a correlation between aggressive behaviors and ERPs . Materials and Method: A total of 42 ASPD patients and a control group of 44 healthy subjects were enrolled in the study. In both groups, the subjects had not used alcohol or any psychotropic medicine for at least 15 days prior to enrollment. Results: There were no significant differences in age, education, and marital status between the ASPD and control group. P3 amplitude (AP3) values were significantly lower in the ASPD group compared to the controls (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, antisosyal kişilik bozukluğu (ASKB) olan ve alkol madde etkisinden arındırılmış bir erkek örnekleminde olaya ilişkin potansiyellerin(ERPs) kontrol grubu ile karşılaştırılması, ayrıca ERPs ve saldırganlık arasında ilişkinin olup olmadığının belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır.Yöntem: 42 ASKB’li birey ve kontrol grubu olarak da 44 sağlıklı birey çalışmaya dâhil edildi. Her iki grupta bulunan denekler çalışmaya katılmadan en az 15 gün önce alkol ve madde kullanımını kesmişti.Bulgular: Yaş, medeni durum, eğitim düzeyleri açısından gruplar arasında anlamlı fark yoktu. P3 (LP3) latansı ASKB grubu ve kontrol grubu arasında anlamlı fark göstermedi. P3 Amplitüd (AP3) değerleri ASKB grubunda kontrol grubuna göre anlamlı oranda düşük bulundu(p

🔖

Cite This Article

PERDECİ, Z., ÖZDAĞ, F., GÜLSÜN, M., ÇELİK, C., KILIÇ, S., ERDEM, M., ÖZDEMİR, B. (2022). Antisosyal kişilik bozukluklarında olaya ilişkin potansiyeller ve saldırganlık. Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 4, 300–306. https://ajindex.com/articles/574227

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

Open in New Tab ↗

↗New Tab

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

Eron LD. Parent-child interaction, television violence, and aggression of children. Am Psychol 1982: 37:197-221 2. Blair RJ, Cipolotti L, Impaired Social Response Reversal, A Case of ‘Acquired Sociopathy’, Brain 2000:123:1122-1141 3. Brower MC, Price BH. Neuropsychiatry of frontal lobe dysfunction in violent and criminal behaviour: a critical review. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery Psychiatry, 2001; 71:720-726 4. Moeller FG, Barratt ES, Dougherty DM, Schmitz JM, Swann AC. Psychiatric aspects of impulsivity. Am J Psychiatry 2001: 158:1783-1793 5. Algul A, Semiz UB, Ates MA, Basoglu C, Doruk A, Ebrinc S, Pan E, Cetin M. Relationship of Substance Use Disorder to Aggression in Male Subjects with Antisocial Personality Disorder. Düşünen Adam - The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences 2007: 20:141-150 (in Turkish). 6. Ak I, Sayar K. Sociobiological factors in Antisocial Personality Disorder. Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni-Bulletin of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 2002; 12: 155-158 (in Turkish). 7. Perdeci Z, Ozmenler KN, Dogruer EA, Ozdag F, Turkbay T. Electrophysiological Analysis of Cortical Excitability and Inhibition Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Understanding Aggressive Behaviors in Antisocial Personality Disorder. Archives Of Neuropschiatry 2009: 46:44-48 (in Turkish). 8. Basar E, Basar-Eroglu C, Karakas S. Are cognitive processes manifested in event-related gamma, alpha, theta and delta oscillations in the EEG. Neurosci Lett, 1999; 259:165-168 9. Bekci B, Karakas S. The Relations Between Electrophysiological and Neuropsychological Measurements: Frontal Lobe Functioning. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 2002; 5; 177-184 10. Cureoglu S, Altındag A, Osma U, Ozen S, Oktay F, Meric F, Topcu I. Evaluation of Brainstem Auditory Evoked Responses in Patients With Conversion Disorders. Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni- Bulletin of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 2000; 10: 129-132 (in Turkish). 11. Ritter W, Simson R, Vaughan HG Jr, Friedman D. A brain event related to the making of a sensory discrimination. Science. 1979:30:203:1358-1361 12. Goodin DS, Aminoff MJ. Evaluation of dementia by event-related potentials. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1992:9:521-525 13. Bond AJ, Surguy SM. Relationship between attitudinal hostility and P300 latencies. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2000:24:1277-1288 14. Mathias CW, Stanford MS. P300 under standard and surprise conditions in self-reported impulsive aggression. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol