Journals / Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3

Temperament and character dimensions, marital adjustment, and sexual satisfaction in couples with sexual dysfunction

Cinsel işlev bozukluğu olan çiftlerde mizaç ve karakter boyutları, evlilik uyumu ve cinsel doyum

Pages
231–244
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found out that the women in thecouples with SD took significantly higher scores in GRISStotal score and all subscales, and men in the coupleswith SD took significantly higher scores in GRISS totalscore and subscales of satisfaction, avoidance, prematureejaculation and impotence than those in the comparisongroup.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Object: The objective of the study is to investigate thedifferences in temperament and character dimensions,marital adjustment and sexual satisfaction between thecouples with and without sexual dysfunction (SD).Methods: The study group consists of 78 marriedwomen and 23 married men with SD diagnosis accordingto DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria and also their spouses(n=202).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The comparison group is composed of marriedcouples without SD (n=200).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found out that the women in thecouples with SD took significantly higher scores in GRISStotal score and all subscales, and men in the coupleswith SD took significantly higher scores in GRISS totalscore and subscales of satisfaction, avoidance, prematureejaculation and impotence than those in the comparisongroup.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Object: The objective of the study is to investigate thedifferences in temperament and character dimensions,marital adjustment and sexual satisfaction between thecouples with and without sexual dysfunction (SD).Methods: The study group consists of 78 marriedwomen and 23 married men with SD diagnosis accordingto DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria and also their spouses(n=202). The comparison group is composed of marriedcouples without SD (n=200). The participants wereapplied Personal Information Form, Temperament andCharacter Inventory (TCI), Golombok-Rust Inventory ofSexual Satisfaction (GRISS), Dyadic Adjustment Scale(DAS). Results: The couples with SD were observed tohave higher cooperativeness and self-transcendence andlower self-directedness scores than those of the comparisongroup. The women partners in the couples with SDwere found to take higher harm avoidance and lowerself-directedness scores than the women in comparisongroup. Dyadic satisfaction, affectional expression andDAS total scores in the couples with SD were seen to besignificantly less than those of the couples in the comparisongroup. It was found out that the women in thecouples with SD took significantly higher scores in GRISStotal score and all subscales, and men in the coupleswith SD took significantly higher scores in GRISS totalscore and subscales of satisfaction, avoidance, prematureejaculation and impotence than those in the comparisongroup. Discussion: It can be said thatcyclothymic character, harm avoidance and self-directednesswere the risk factors for SD. Marital adjustment andsexual satisfaction are insufficient in the couples withSD.

Özet

Amaç: Çalýþmanýn amacý cinsel iþlev bozukluðu (CÝB) olan ve olmayan çiftler arasýndaki mizaç ve karakter boyutlarý, evlilik uyumu ve cinsel doyumdaki farklýlýklarý araþtýrmaktýr. Yöntem: Çalýþma grubu DSM-IV-TR taný ölçütlerine göre CÝB tanýsý alan 78 evli kadýn ve 23 evli erkek ile onlarýn eþlerinden (n=202), karþýlaþtýrma grubu CÝB olmayan evli çiftlerden (n=200) oluþmuþtur. Katýlýmcýlara Kiþisel Bilgi Formu, Mizaç ve Karakter Envanteri (MKE), Golombok-Rust Cinsel Doyum Ölçeði (GRCDÖ), Çift Uyum Ölçeði (ÇUÖ) uygulanmýþtýr. Bulgular: CÝB’i olan çiftlerin karþýlaþtýrma grubundan yüksek iþbirliði yapma ve kendini aþma, düþük kendini yönetme puaný olduðu görülmüþtür. CÝB’i olan çiftlerde kadýn partnerin karþýlaþtýrma grubundaki kadýnlara göre yüksek zarardan kaçýnma, düþük kendini yönetme puaný aldýklarý bulunmuþtur. CÝB’i olan çiftlerde çift doyumu, sevgi gösterme ve ÇUÖ toplam puanlarýnýn karþýlaþtýrma grubundaki çiftlere göre anlamlý olarak daha az olduðu görülmüþtür. CÝB’i olan çiftlerde, kadýnlarýn GRCDÖ toplam puaný ve tüm alt ölçeklerinden, erkeklerin GRCDÖ toplam puaný ve doyum, kaçýnma, erken boþalma ve empotans alt ölçeklerinden karþýlaþtýrma grubuna göre anlamlý düzeyde daha yüksek puanlar aldýklarý bulunmuþtur. Sonuç: Siklotimik karakter, zarardan kaçýnma ve kendini yönetme özelliklerinin CÝB için bir risk faktörü olduðu söylenebilir. CÝB olan çiftlerde evlilik uyumu ve cinsel doyum azdýr.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARKAR, H., ÖZTÜRK, C. Ş. (2022). Temperament and character dimensions, marital adjustment, and sexual satisfaction in couples with sexual dysfunction. Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3, 231–244. https://ajindex.com/articles/571995

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association; 2013
  2. Amerikan Psikiyatri Birliði. DSM-IV-TR Taný Ölçütleri Baþvuru El Kitabý. Köroðlu E (Çeviri ed.). Ýkinci baský (2005). Ankara: Hekimler Yayýn Birliði; 2000
  3. Laumann EO, Paik A, Rosen RC. Sexual dysfunction in the United States: Prevalence and predictors. JAMA 1999; 281: 537- 44
  4. Oksuz E, Malhan S. Prevalence and risk factors for female sexual dysfunction in Turkish women. J Urol 2006; 175: 654-658
  5. Oksuz E, Malhan S. The prevalence of male sexual dysfunction and potential risk factors in Turkish men: a web-based survey. Int J Impot Res 2005; 17: 539-545
  6. Bozkurt A, Ozmenler KN, Karlidere T, Iþýklý H, Gulsun M, Ak M, Yetkin S, Ozgen F, Ozsahin A, Aydýn H. Characteristics of male sexual dysfunction subjects from a sociocultural perspective: Analysis of 18 years. New/Yeni Symposium Journal 2013; 51: 37-45
  7. Sungur MZ. Erkek cinsel iþlev bozukluklarý. Psikiyatri Dünyasý 1999; 3: 60-64
  8. Harris JM, Cherkas LF, Kato BS, Heiman JR, Spector TD. Normal variations in personality are associated with coital orgasmic infrequency in heterosexual women: A populationbased study. J Sex Med 2008; 5: 1177-1183
  9. McCabe M, Althof SE, Assalian P, Chevret-Measson M, Leiblum SR, Simonelli C, Wylie, K. Psychological and interpersonal dimensions of sexual function and dysfunction. J Sex Med 2010; 7: 327-336
  10. Andersen AM, Bienvenu OJ. Personality and psychopathology. Int Rev Psychiatry 2011; 23: 234-247
  11. Mullins-Sweatt SN, Lengel GJ. Clinical utility of the Five- Factor Model of personality. J Pers 2012; 80: 1615-1639
  12. Cloninger CR, Svrakic DM, Przybeck TR. A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1993; 50: 975-990
  13. Conrad R, Schilling G, Bausch C, Nadstawek J, Wartenberg HC, Wegener I, Geiser F, Imbierowicz K, Liedtke R. Temperament and character personality profiles and personality disorders in chronic pain patients. Pain 2007; 133: 197-209
  14. Heaven PCL, Fitzpatrick J, Craig FL, Kelly P, Sebar G. Five personality factors and sex: Preliminary findings. Personality and Individual Differences 2000; 28: 1133-1141
  15. Konkan R, Bayrak M, Gönüllü OG, Þenormancý Ö, Sungur MZ. Vajinusmuslu kadýnlarda cinsel iþlev ve doyum. Düþünen Adam Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi 2012; 25: 305-311
  16. Leeners B, Hengartner MP, Ajdacic-Gross V, Rössler W, Angst J. Dy