Journals / Kartal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1

Our otoplasty results with suture-only techniques

Sadece sütürleme yöntemi ile elde ettiğimiz otoplasti sonuçlarımız

Pages
15–19
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION: The suture-only technique is a safe and simple technique that may be an alternative to the other techniques that involve abrasion, incision and/or tubing.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: The human auricles are important parts of the aesthetic facial units.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Many techniques have been published for correcting and reducing the complication rates of prominent ear.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION: The suture-only technique is a safe and simple technique that may be an alternative to the other techniques that involve abrasion, incision and/or tubing.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The human auricles are important parts of the aesthetic facial units. Many techniques have been published for correcting and reducing the complication rates of prominent ear. The present report aims to report our experience and results with suture-only otoplasty techniques. METHODS: Seventeen patients with 33 prominent ears were treated with Mustarde and conchomastoid suture techniques. Under general anesthesia, all patients were operated without cartilage incision, excision, abrasion, or scoring. After the antihelix was composed, the conchomastoid suture was tied and then the excessive skin excised. A tight dressing was applied. RESULTS: Complications of the operations included hematoma in one ear as the major complication (3.3%) and asymmetric ear as the other (3.3%). All patients were satisfied with the results (100%). CONCLUSION: The suture-only technique is a safe and simple technique that may be an alternative to the other techniques that involve abrasion, incision and/or tubing.

Özet

AMAÇ: İnsan kulağı estetik fasiyal ünitelerin önemli bir parçasını oluşturur. Kepçe kulağı düzeltici ve komplikasyon oranlarını azaltıcı çok sayıda teknik bildirilmiştir. Amacımız tek başına sütür otoplasti tekniği ile elde etiğimiz sonuçları ve tecrübelerimizi paylaşmaktır. YÖNTEMLER: Mustarde tekniği ve konkomastoid sütür tekniği ile tedavi edilmiş olan 17 hastanın 33 kepçe kulağı çalışmaya dahil edildi. Genel anestezi altında, herhangi bir kartilaj insizyonu, eksizyonu, abrazyon veya skorlama yapılmadan antiheliks oluşturulup konkomastoid sütür atıldı ve aurikülanın fazla gelen cilt kısmı çıkarıldı. Ameliyat sonrası sıkı baskılı sargı uygulandı. BULGULAR: Majör komplikasyon olarak bir hastada hematom (%3.3), bir başka hastada asimetri (%3.3) gelişti. Hasta memnuniyeti %100 olarak saptandı. SONUÇ: Sadece sütürleme yöntemleri ile yapılan otoplasti basit ve kolay uygulanabilir bir yöntemdir. Abrazyon, insizyon ve/veya tüp oluşturma gibi tekniklere alternatif olarak kullanılabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİK, Ö., TEPE, Ç. K., ÇELEBİ, Ş. (2022). Our otoplasty results with suture-only techniques. Kartal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1, 15–19. https://ajindex.com/articles/571493

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Salgarelli AC, Bellini P, Multinu A, Landini B, Broccaioli E, Consolo U. Combined technique for the correction of prominent ears: results in 140 patients. Br J Oral Maxil- lofac Surg 2009;47(7):545-9
  2. Adamson JE, Horton CE, Crawford HH. The growth pattern of the external ear. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1965;36(4):466-70
  3. Bradbury ET, Hewison J, Timmons MJ. Psychological and social outcome of prominent ear correction in children. Br J Plast Surg 1992;45(2):97-100
  4. Hassanpour SE, Moosavizadeh SM. Posterior scoring of the scapha as a refinement in aesthetic otoplasty. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010;63(1):78-86
  5. Campbell AC. Otoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 2005;21(4):310- 6
  6. Janis JE, Rohrich RJ, Gutowski KA. Otoplasty. Plast Re- constr Surg. 2005;115(4):60-72
  7. Mustardé JC. The treatment of prominent ears by buried mattress sutures: a ten-year survey. Plast Reconstr Surg 1967;39(4):382-6
  8. Scuderi N, Tenna S, Bitonti A, Vonella M. Repositioning of posterior auricular muscle combined with conventional otoplasty: a personal technique. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2007;60(2):201-4
  9. Gosain AK, Recinos RF. Otoplasty in children less than four years of age: surgical technique. J Craniofac Surg 2002;13(4):505-9
  10. Vuyk HD. Cartilage-sparing otoplasty: a review with long-term results. J Laryngol Otol 1997;111(5):424-30
  11. Rubino C, Farace F, Figus A, Masia DR. Anterior scoring of the upper helical cartilage as a refinement in aesthetic otoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2005;29(2):88-94
  12. Erol OO. New modification in otoplasty: anterior ap- proach. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107(1):193-205. 13. de la Torre J, Tenenhaus M, Douglas BK, Swinburne JK. A simplified technique of otoplasty: the temporary Kaye suture. Ann Plast Surg 1998;41(1):94-6
  13. Echarri San Martín R, Hernando Cuñado M, Montojo Woodeson J, Plaza Mayor G. Otoplasty: results after anterior versus posterior approach. [Article in Spanish] Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2011;62(3):188-93
  14. Mustarde JC. The correction of prominent ears using simple mattress sutures. Br J Plast Surg 1963;16:170-8
  15. Furnas DW. Correction of prominent ears by concha- mastoid sutures. Plast reconstr Surg 1968;42:149
  16. Stenstrom SJ. A “natural” technique for correction of congenitally prominent ears. Plast Reconstr Surg 1963;33:509
  17. Calder JC, Naasan A. Morbidity of otoplasty: a review of 562 consecutive cases. Br J Plast Surg 1994;47(3):170-4
  18. Cıncık H, Erkul E, Çekin E, Doğru S, Güngör A, Po