SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kartal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2

Spigelian hernia: Case series and our experience

Spigel hernisi: Olgu serisi ve deneyimimiz

Hasan Baki ALTINSOY
Selim SÖZEN
Seyfi EMİR
Pages
72–76
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION: Mesh herniorraphy techniques using polypropylene meshes can be preformed with low recurrence rates.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: Patients diagnosed with Spigelian hernia are evaluated retrospectively by review of the literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS: The study included 17 patients (12 female, 5 male; mean age 52; range 32 to 74 years) who were diagnosed with a Spigelian hernia which was treated surgically.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION: Mesh herniorraphy techniques using polypropylene meshes can be preformed with low recurrence rates.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patients diagnosed with Spigelian hernia are evaluated retrospectively by review of the literature. METHODS: The study included 17 patients (12 female, 5 male; mean age 52; range 32 to 74 years) who were diagnosed with a Spigelian hernia which was treated surgically. Patients were evaluated in terms of age, sex, clinical presentation, localization, size of the defect, duration of hospitalization, and surgical techniques. RESULTS: Average size of the defect was 3.7 (2-6) cm. All of the patients reported pain. Eleven patients were treated with mesh herniorraphy techniques. Six patients were treated by the standard surgical technique. During the follow-up of 4-48 months, no recurrence was observed among the mesh herniorraphy group. CONCLUSION: Mesh herniorraphy techniques using polypropylene meshes can be preformed with low recurrence rates.

Özet

AMAÇ: Spigel hernisi tanısı konulan hastalar geriye dönük olarak literatür eşliğinde incelendi. YÖNTEMLER: Bu çalışmaya Spigel hernisi tanısı ile ameliyat edilen 17 hasta (12 kadın, 5 erkek; ort. yaş 52; dağılım 32-74 yaş) dahil edildi. Hastalar yaş, cinsiyet, şikayetler, lokalizasyon, defekt çapı, hastanede yatış süresi ve onarım teknikleri açısından incelendi. BULGULAR: Ortalama defekt çapı 3.7 (2-6) cm idi. Tüm hastalarda ağrı şikayeti vardı. Hastaların 11’ine polipropilen yama ile, 6’sına standart cerrahi ile onarım yapıldı. Polipropilen yama ile onarım uygulanan hastalarda 4-48 aylık takiplerde nüks saptanmadı. SONUÇ: Spigel hernilerinde polipropilen yama ile cerrahi onarım düşük nüks oranlarıyla uygulanabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTINSOY, H. B., SÖZEN, S., EMİR, S. (2022). Spigelian hernia: Case series and our experience. Kartal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2, 72–76. https://ajindex.com/articles/571435

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Skandalakis PN, Zoras O, Skandalakis JE, Mirilas P. Spigelian hernia: surgical anatomy, embryology, and technique of repair. Am Surg 2006;72(1):42-8
  2. Rauth T, Holzman M, Tarpley J. Spigelian, lumbar and obturator herniation. In: Cameron JL, editor. Current surgical therapy. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby; 2008. p. 576-81
  3. Skandalakis LJ, Gadacz TR, Mansberger AR. Modern hernia repair. 1 st ed. New York: Parthenon Publishing Com; 2002
  4. Sözüer EM, Küçük C, Akyıldız H. Karın ön duvarı, lumbal ve pelvik fıtıklar. Türkiye Klinikleri J Surg Med Sci 2006;2(35):78-81
  5. Malazgirt Z, Topgul K, Sokmen S, Ersin S, Turkcapar AG, Gok H, et al. Spigelian hernias: a prospective analysis of baseline parameters and surgical outcome of 34 consecutive patients. Hernia 2006;10(4):326-30
  6. Coşkun A, Eryılmaz R, Güzey D, Daşıran F, Şahin M. Spigel hernisi: Tanı ve tedavisi. Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi 2006;22(4):137-39
  7. Mittal T, Kumar V, Khullar R, Sharma A, Soni V, Baijal M, et al. Diagnosis and management of Spigelian hernia: A review of literature and our experience. J Minim Access Surg 2008;4(4):95-8
  8. Balthazar EJ, Subramanyam BR, Megibow A. Spigelian hernia: CT and ultrasonography diagnosis. Gastrointest Radiol 1984;9(1):81-4
  9. Luedke M, Scholz FJ, Larsen CR. Computed tomographic evaluation of spigelian hernia. Comput Med Imaging Graph 1988;12(2):123-9
  10. Shenouda NF, Hyams BB, Rosenbloom MB. Evaluation of Spigelian hernia by CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1990;14(5):777-8
  11. Torzilli G, Carmana G, Lumachi V, Gnocchi P, Olivari N. The usefulness of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of the Spigelian hernia. Int Surg 1995;80(3):280-2
  12. Losanoff J, Kjossev K, Handijev S, Karamfilova R. The diagnosis of Spigelian hernia (SH) by high-resolution realtime sonography. J Ultrasound Med 1998;17(9):599- 600
  13. Larson DW, Farley DR. Spigelian hernias: repair and outcome for 81 patients. World J Surg 2002;26(10):1277- 81
  14. Bennett D. Incidence and management of primary abdominal wall hernias: umbilical, epigastric and spigelian. In: Fitzgibbons RJ, Greenburg AG, editors. Nyhus and Condon’s hernia. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams&Wilkins; 2002. p. 389-413
  15. Martin M, Paquette B, Badet N, Sheppard F, Aubry S, Delabrousse E. Spigelian hernia: CT findings and clinical relevance. Abdom Imaging 2012 Apr 3. [Epub ahead of print] 16. Moreno-Egea A, Flores B, Girela E, Martín JG, Aguayo JL, Canteras M. Spigelian hernia: bibliographical study and pres