Journals / Kartal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1

The outcomes of descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (dsaek) for corneal endothelial dysfunction

Korneal endotelyal disfonksiyonlu hastaların tedavisinde dsaek (descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty) sonuçları

Pages
5–12
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The mean follow up period was 20.8±7.8 months (6-36 months).The mean UCVA was improved from 0.11±0.11 (range, hand mo-tion-0.3) to 0.52±0.23 (range, 0.1-0.9) (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Kerat- plasty (DSAEK) results in corneal endothelial dysfunction was re- ported in this paper.Methods: Twenty-five eyes of 25 patients having endothelial dys- function were included in this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: 19 eyes (76%) had bullous keratopathy, 4 eyes (16%) had Fuch’s endothelial dystrophy and 2 eyes (8%) had corneal graft fail-ure.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The mean follow up period was 20.8±7.8 months (6-36 months).The mean UCVA was improved from 0.11±0.11 (range, hand mo-tion-0.3) to 0.52±0.23 (range, 0.1-0.9) (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Kerat- plasty (DSAEK) results in corneal endothelial dysfunction was re- ported in this paper.Methods: Twenty-five eyes of 25 patients having endothelial dys- function were included in this study. Preoperatively and postopera- tively complete ophthalmic examinations were performed includ- ing uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), central corneal thickness (CCT), endothelial cell density (ECD) and complications were recorded. Results: 19 eyes (76%) had bullous keratopathy, 4 eyes (16%) had Fuch’s endothelial dystrophy and 2 eyes (8%) had corneal graft fail-ure. The mean follow up period was 20.8±7.8 months (6-36 months).The mean UCVA was improved from 0.11±0.11 (range, hand mo-tion-0.3) to 0.52±0.23 (range, 0.1-0.9) (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu yazıda, endotel yetersizliği bulunan hastalarda DSA-EK (Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratop-lasty) ameliyatı sonuçları değerlendirildi.Gereç ve Yöntem: DSAEK tekniği ile endotelyal keratoplastiyapılan 25 hastanın 25 gözü çalışmaya alındı. Ameliyat öncesive sonrası kontrollerde düzeltilmemiş görme keskinliği (DGK),düzeltilmiş en iyi görme keskinliği (DEGK), göz içi basıncı (GİB),merkezi kornea kalınlığı (MKK), endotel hücre yoğunluğu (EHY)ve komplikasyonlar kaydedildi.Bulgular: Ameliyat öncesi 19 (%76) gözde büllöz keratopati,4 (%16) gözde Fuch distrofisi ve 2 (%8) gözde greft yetersizli-ği mevcut olup ortalama takip süresi 20.8±7.8 ay (6-36 ay) idi.DGK ameliyat öncesi 0.11±0.11 (el hareketi-0.3) iken, son kont-rolde 0.52±0.23 (dağılım, 0.1-0.9) idi (p

🔖

Cite This Article

GENÇ, O., KUBALOĞLU, A., BULUT, N., GÜNEŞ, A. S., EVCİLİ, P. S., KUTLUTÜRK, I., ÇINAR, T. K., ÇINAR, Y. (2022). The outcomes of descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (dsaek) for corneal endothelial dysfunction. Kartal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1, 5–12. https://ajindex.com/articles/571418

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Geroski DH, Matsuda M, Yee RW, Edelhauser HF. Pump function of the human corneal endothelium. Effects of age and cornea guttata. Ophthalmology 1985;92(6):759- 63
  2. Terry MA, Ousley PJ. Deep lamellar endothelial kerato- plasty in the first United States patients: early clinical results. Cornea 2001;20(3):239-43
  3. Busin M, Arffa RC, Sebastiani A. Endokeratoplasty as an alternative to penetrating keratoplasty for the surgical treatment of diseased endothelium: initial results. Oph- thalmology 2000;107(11):2077-82
  4. Melles GR, Lander F, van Dooren BT, Pels E, Beekhuis WH. Preliminary clinical results of posterior lamellar kerato- plasty through a sclerocorneal pocket incision. Ophthal- mology 2000;107(10):1850-7
  5. Price MO, Price FW. Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2007;18(4):290-4
  6. American Academy of Ophthalmology. Clinical ap- proach to Corneal Transplantation. Basic and Clini- cal Science Course; External Disease and Cornea LEO 2006:453-69
  7. Melles GR, Eggink FA, Lander F, Pels E, Rietveld FJ, Beekhuis WH, et al. A surgical technique for posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea 1998;17(6):618-26
  8. Terry MA. Endothelial replacement. In: Krachmer JH, Mannis MJ, Holland EJ, editors. Cornea: surgery of the cornea and conjunctiva. Vol 2., 2nd ed. Philadelphia: El- sevier Mosby; 2005. p. 1707-18
  9. Terry MA. Endothelial keratoplasty: history, current state, and future directions. Cornea 2006;25(8):873-8
  10. Gorovoy MS. Descemet-stripping automated endothe- lial keratoplasty. Cornea 2006;25(8):886-9
  11. Terry MA, Wall JM, Hoar KL, Ousley PJ. A prospective study of endothelial cell loss during the 2 years after deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 2007;114(4):631-9
  12. Mehta JS, Por YM, Beuerman RW, Tan DT. Glide insertion technique for donor cornea lenticule during Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33(11):1846-50
  13. Terry MA, Shamie N, Chen ES, Phillips PM, Shah AK, Hoar KL, et al. Endothelial keratoplasty for Fuchs’ dystrophy with cataract: complications and clinical results with the new triple procedure. Ophthalmology 2009;116(4):631- 9
  14. Price MO, Price FW Jr. Endothelial cell loss after descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty influencing fac- tors and 2-year trend. Ophthalmology 2008;115(5):857- 65
  15. Hill JC. The mechanism and management of corneal graft rejection. New York: Kugler Publications BV, 1996
  16. Terry MA.