Journals / Kartal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3

0-5 Yaş Arası 250 Türk Çocukta Penis Uzunluğu ile Pelvik Antropometrik Ölçümler Arasındaki Korelasyonun Araştırılması

Investigation of the Correlation Between Pelvic Anthropometric Measurements and Penile Length of 250 Turkish Boys Aged 0-5 Years

Pages
200–204
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These assessments were performed under optimal conditions.Results: Overall mean height of the children was 55.82±3.22 cm, mean weight was 4729.08±54.23 g, mean interspinous distance was 12.757±1.21 cm, mean PBH was 2.56±0.46 cm, and mean SPL was 2.69±0.57 cm.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: In the present study, stretched penile length (SPL) of children aged 0-60 months was measured and relationship to anthropometric parameters of age, height, weight, interspinous distance, and pubic bone height (PBH) was evaluated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data obtained were compared with results of similar studies.Methods: Total of 250 boys (age range: 0-60 months) participated in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These assessments were performed under optimal conditions.Results: Overall mean height of the children was 55.82±3.22 cm, mean weight was 4729.08±54.23 g, mean interspinous distance was 12.757±1.21 cm, mean PBH was 2.56±0.46 cm, and mean SPL was 2.69±0.57 cm.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: In the present study, stretched penile length (SPL) of children aged 0-60 months was measured and relationship to anthropometric parameters of age, height, weight, interspinous distance, and pubic bone height (PBH) was evaluated. Data obtained were compared with results of similar studies.Methods: Total of 250 boys (age range: 0-60 months) participated in the study. All measurements of SPL, weight, height, interspinous distance, and PBH were conducted by single urologist. These assessments were performed under optimal conditions.Results: Overall mean height of the children was 55.82±3.22 cm, mean weight was 4729.08±54.23 g, mean interspinous distance was 12.757±1.21 cm, mean PBH was 2.56±0.46 cm, and mean SPL was 2.69±0.57 cm. Relationship between SPL and age, weight, height, and interspinous distance was statistically significant (r=0.240, p=0.001; r=0.242, p=0.001; r=0.204, p=0.006; r=0.224, p=0.002, respectively). Relationship between SPL and PBH was not statistically significant (r=0.97, p=0.191).Conclusion: Correct evaluation of penis size abnormality requires both knowledge of age and origin-specific average SPL values and analysis of these data. Present study provides current reference values for Caucasian boys aged 0-60 months. When combined with anthropometric measurements, these data may be beneficial to clinicians in diagnosis and treatment process

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmamızda 0-60 ay arası çocukların gerilmiş penis uzunluğu (GPU) ölçüldü ve yaş-boy-kilo-interspinöz mesafe ve pubis yüksekliği gibi antropometrik parametrelerle ilişkisi değerlendirildi. Elde ettiğimiz veriler, benzer diğer literatür çalışmaları ile karşılaştırıldı.Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmamız, 0-60 ay yaş arası 250 erkek çocukta yapıldı. Bütün çocukların gerilmiş penis uzunluğu, kilosu, boyu, interspinöz mesafesi ve pubis yüksekliği tek bir ürolog tarafından değerlendirildi. Bu değerlendirmeler optimal poliklinik şartlarında gerçekleştirildi.Bulgular: Çocukların ortalama boyu 55.82±3.22 cm, ortalama vücut ağırlığı 4729.08±54.23 gr, ortalama interspinöz mesafesi 12.757±1.21 cm, ortalama pubis yüksekliği 2.56±0.46 cm, GPU 2.69±0.57 cm olarak ölçüldü. Gerilmiş penis uzunluğu ile çocukların yaşı, ağırlığı, boyu ve interspinöz mesafesi arasında belirgin bir ilişki bulundu (sırasıyla: r=0.240, p=0.001; r=0.242, p=0.001; r=0.204, p=0.006; r=0.224, p=0.002). GPU ve pubis yüksekliği arasında anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmadı (r=0.97, p=0.191).Sonuç: Penis uzunluğundaki anomalileri doğru değerlendirebilmek için yaşa ve ırka özgü ortalama GPU değerleri bilinip, bu veriler göz önünde tutularak muayene yapılmalıdır. Çalışmamız 0-60 ay yaş aralığındaki beyaz ırk çocuklar için güncel referans değerler sağlamıştır. Antropometrik ölçümlerle birlikte değerlendirildiğinde bu veriler klinisyenlere tanı ve tedavi süreci aşamalarında yararlı olabilir

🔖

Cite This Article

ARDA, E., ÖZDEMİR, Y., ARABACI, Ö., YILMAZ, A., AKDERE, H. (2022). 0-5 Yaş Arası 250 Türk Çocukta Penis Uzunluğu ile Pelvik Antropometrik Ölçümler Arasındaki Korelasyonun Araştırılması. Kartal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3, 200–204. https://ajindex.com/articles/571260

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Guo LL, Tang DX. Measurement of penile length in children and its significance. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 2013;19:835-40
  2. Da Silva EA, Schiavini J, Yang S, Miranda M, Damião R. Health-related quality of life of patients who underwent multiple surgeries for penile diseases. J Sex Med 2004;1:80
  3. Lee JH, Ji YH, Lee SK, Hwang HH, Ryu DS, Kim KS, et al. Change in penile length in children: preliminary study. Korean J Urol 2012;53:870-4
  4. Aaronson IA. Micropenis: medical and surgical implications. J Urol 1994;152:4-14
  5. Smith DP, Rickman C, Jerkins GR. Ultrasound evaluation of normal penile (corporeal) length in children. J Urol 1995;154:822-4
  6. Perovic SV, Djordjevic ML. Penile lengthening. BJU Int 2000;86:1028-33
  7. Shamloul R. Treatment of men complaining of short penis. Urology 2005;65:1183-5
  8. Camurdan AD, Oz MO, Ilhan MN, Camurdan OM, Sahin F, Beyazova U. Current stretched penile length: crosssectional study of 1040 healthy Turkish children aged 0 to 5 years. Urology 2007;70:572-5
  9. Cinaz P, Yeşilkaya E, Onganlar YH, Boyraz M, Bideci A, Camurdan O, et al. Penile anthropometry of normal prepubertal boys in Turkey. Acta Paediatr 2012;101:33-6
  10. Schonfeld WA, Beebe GW. Normal growth and variation in the male genitalia from birth to maturity. J Urol 1942;48:759-77
  11. Boas M, Boisen KA, Virtanen HE, Kaleva M, Suomi AM, Schmidt IM, et al. Postnatal penile length and growth rate correlate to serum testosterone levels: a longitudinal study of 1962 normal boys. Eur J Endocrinol 2006;154:125-9
  12. Smith DP, Rickman C, Jerkins GR. Ultrasound evaluation of normal penile (corporeal) length in children. J Urol 1995;154:822-4
  13. Kulkarni ML, Rajendran NK. Normal values for penile standards in newborns. Indian Pediatr 1991;28:1341-3
  14. Vasudevan G, Manivarmane, Bhat BV, Bhatia BD, Kumar S. Genital standards for south Indian male newborns. Indian J Pediatr 1995;62:593-6
  15. Ozbey H, Temiz A, Salman T. A simple method for measuring penile length in newborns and infants. BJU Int 1999;84:1093-4
  16. Al-Herbish AS. Standard penile size for normal full term newborns in the Saudi population. Saudi Med J 2002;23:314-6
  17. Lian WB, Lee WR, Ho LY. Penile length of newborns in Singapore. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2000;13:55-62
  18. Sutan-Assin M, Rukman J, Dahlan A. Penile dimensions of newborn infants. Paediatr Indones 1989;29:146-50
  19. Fujieda K, Matsuura N. Growth and maturation in the male genitalia from birth to adolescence. II. Change of penile len