Journals / Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3

Determining the Location of Tibial Fracture of Dog and Cat Using Hybridized Mask R-CNN Architecture

Hibrit Mask R-CNN Mimarisi Kullanılarak Köpek ve Kedi Tibia Kırık Yerinin Belirlenmesi

Pages
347–353
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of the studyshowed that the hybrid system developed would be beneficial in terms of protecting animal health by making more successful and fasterdetections than the original Mask R-CNN architecture

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to hybridize the original backbone structure used in the Mask R-CNN framework, and to detect fracture location indog and cat tibia fractures faster and with higher performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, a total of 518 dog and cat fracture tibia images thatobtained from universities and institutions were used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of the studyshowed that the hybrid system developed would be beneficial in terms of protecting animal health by making more successful and fasterdetections than the original Mask R-CNN architecture
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study is to hybridize the original backbone structure used in the Mask R-CNN framework, and to detect fracture location indog and cat tibia fractures faster and with higher performance. With the hybrid study, it will be ensured that veterinarians help diagnosefractures on the tibia with higher accuracy by using a computerized system. In this study, a total of 518 dog and cat fracture tibia images thatobtained from universities and institutions were used. F1 score value of this study on total dataset was found to be 85.8%. F1 score valueof this study on dog dataset was found to be 87.8%. F1 score value of this study on cat dataset was found to be 77.7%. With the developedhybrid system, it was determined that the localization of the fracture in an average tibia image took 2.88 seconds. The results of the studyshowed that the hybrid system developed would be beneficial in terms of protecting animal health by making more successful and fasterdetections than the original Mask R-CNN architecture

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı Mask R-CNN çatısında kullanılan orjinal omurga yapısını hibrit hale getirerek köpek ve kedi tibia kırıklarındaki kırık bölgelerinin tespitini daha hızlı ve daha yüksek performans ile sağlamaktır. Yapılan hibrit çalışma ile bigisayarlaştırılmış sistem kullanılarak daha yüksek doğruluk oranıyla veteriner hekimlerin tibia üzerindeki kırık teşhislerine yardımcı olması sağlanacaktır. Bu çalışmada üniversitelerden ve kurumlardan elde edilen toplam 518 adet köpek ve kedi kırık tibia kemiği görüntüsü kullanıldı. Bu çalışmanın F1 skor değeri toplam veri seti üzerinde %85.8 olarak bulundu. Çalışmanın köpek veri seti üzerindeki F1 skor değeri %87.8 olarak bulundu. Çalışmanın kedi veri seti üzerindeki F1 skor değeri %77.7 olarak bulundu. Geliştirilen hibrit sistem ile ortalama bir kırık tibia görüntüsündeki kırık yerinin lokalizasyonu 2.88 saniye sürdüğü tespit edildi. Çalışmanın sonuçları, geliştirilen hibrit sistemin orjinal Mask R-CNN mimarisine göre daha başarılı ve hızlı tespitler yaparak hayvan sağlığının korunması açısından faydalı olacağını gösterdi.

🔖

Cite This Article

BARIŞÇI, N., ÜNVER, H. M., BAYDAN, B. (2022). Determining the Location of Tibial Fracture of Dog and Cat Using Hybridized Mask R-CNN Architecture. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3, 347–353. https://ajindex.com/articles/569861

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Singh G, Mishra A, Sagar D: An overview of artificial intelligence. SBIT J Sci Technol, 2 (1): 1-4, 2013. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20660.19840 2. Dhankar M, Walia N: An introduction to artificial intelligence. In, Kumar M, Choudhary R, Pandey SK (Eds): Emerging Trends in Big Data, IoT and Cyber Security. First Impression, 105-108, Maharaja Surajmal Institute. Excellent Publishing Services, New Delhi, 2020. 3. Haenlein M, Kaplan A: A brief history of artificial intelligence: On the past, present, and future of artificial intelligence. Calif Manag Rev, 61 (4): 5-14, 2019. DOI: 10.1177/0008125619864925 4. Yi PH, Hui FK, Ting DSW: Artificial intelligence and radiology: Collaboration is key. J Am Coll Radiol, 15 (5): 781-783, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j. jacr.2017.12.037 5. Kalmet PHS, Sanduleanu S, Prımakov S, Wu G, Jochems A, Refaee T, Ibrahim A, Hulst LV, Lambin P, Poeze M: Deep learning in fracture detection: A narrative review. Acta Orthop, 91 (2): 215-220, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1711323 6. Pak U, Kim C, Ryu U, Sok K, Pak S: A hybrid model based on convolutional neural networks and long short-term memory for ozone concentration prediction. Air Qual Atmos Health, 11 (3): 883-895, 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s11869-018-0585-1 7. Pesapane F, Volonte C, Codari M, Sardanelli F: Artificial intelligence as a medical device in radiology: Ethical and regulatory issues in Europe and the United States. Insights Imaging, 9 (5): 745-753, 2018. DOI: 10.1007/ s13244-018-0645-y 8. Ting DSW, Wu WC, Toth C: Deep learning for retinopathy of prematurity screening. Br J Ophthalmol, 103 (5): 577-579, 2019. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313290 9.Cihan P, Gökçe E, Kalıpsız O: A review of machine learning applications in veterinary field. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 23 (4): 673-680, 2017. DOI: 10.9775/kvfd.2016.17281 10. Cihan P, Gökçe E, Atakişi O, Kırmızıgül AH, Erdoğan HM: Prediction of immunoglobulin G in lambs with artificial intelligence methods. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 27 (1): 21-27, 2021. DOI: 10.9775/kvfd.2020.24642 11. Baydan B, Ünver HM: Detection of tibial fracture in cats and dogs with deep learning. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, 2021 (Article in press). DOI: 10.33988/auvfd.772685 12. Kim DH, MacKinnon T: Artificial intelligence in fracture detection: Transfer learning from deep convolutional neural networks. Clin Radiol, 73 (5): 439-445, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.11.015 13. Kvam J, Gangsei LE, Kongsro J, Schistad Solberg AH: The use of deep learning to automate the segmen