Journals / Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of Quality Parameters of Chicken Eggs Stored at Different Temperatures

Farklı Sıcaklıklarda Depolanan Tavuk Yumurtalarının Kalite Parametrelerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
247–254
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When a comparison was made between the eggs kept in the room and the fridge temperature, significant differences were found in terms of albumen index, Haugh unit, egg yolk index and egg yolk height parameters (P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out to evaluate the effect of temperature and time on the internal and external quality of chicken eggs stored at room and fridge temperature for 28 days.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 176 eggs of Lohmann Brown (LSL) laying hens were used for the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When a comparison was made between the eggs kept in the room and the fridge temperature, significant differences were found in terms of albumen index, Haugh unit, egg yolk index and egg yolk height parameters (P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study was carried out to evaluate the effect of temperature and time on the internal and external quality of chicken eggs stored at room and fridge temperature for 28 days. A total of 176 eggs of Lohmann Brown (LSL) laying hens were used for the study. The eggs from the same batch were stored at fridge (5°C) and room temperature (25°C), internal and external quality parameters and microbiological analyzes of eggs were evaluated on days 0, 1, 8, 18, 21 and 28. No coliform bacteria, E. coli and Salmonella spp. were detected. At the end of the evaluation, the eggs stored at room temperature were found to have been negatively affected in terms of albumen index and Haugh unit parameters from day 8 onwards. When a comparison was made between the eggs kept in the room and the fridge temperature, significant differences were found in terms of albumen index, Haugh unit, egg yolk index and egg yolk height parameters (P

Özet

Bu araştırma oda ve buzdolabı sıcaklığında 28 gün depolanan tavuk yumurtalarında sıcaklık ve sürenin yumurtaların iç ve dış kalitesine etkisini değerlendirmek amacıyla yapıldı. Araştırma için Lohmann Brown (LSL) cinsi yumurtacı tavuklara ait toplam 176 adet yumurta kullanıldı. Aynı partiden alınan yumurtalar buzdolabı (5°C) ve oda sıcaklığında (25°C) muhafaza edildi. 0, 1, 8, 18, 21 ve 28. günlerde, yumurtaların iç ve dış kalite parametreleri ile mikrobiyolojik analizleri değerlendirildi. Örneklerin hiçbirinde koliform bakteri, E. coli ve Salmonella spp. tespit edilmedi. Değerlendirme sonucunda, oda sıcaklığında muhafaza edilen yumurtalar 8. günden itibaren yumurta akı indeksi ve Haugh ünitesi parametreleri açısından belirgin düzeyde olumsuz etkilendi. Oda ve buzdolabı sıcaklığında muhafaza edilen yumurtalar arasında kıyaslama yapıldığında; albumen indeksi, Haugh ünitesi, yumurta sarısı indeksi ve yumurta sarısı yüksekliği parametreleri açısından anlamlı farklar olduğu belirlendi (P

🔖

Cite This Article

AKSU, F., ALTUNATMAZ, S. S., BALA, D. A., ÇELİK, C., AKYAZI, İ. (2022). Evaluation of Quality Parameters of Chicken Eggs Stored at Different Temperatures. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2, 247–254. https://ajindex.com/articles/569658

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Çelebi Ş, Karaca H: Egg nutritional value, cholesterol content and studies on the nutritionally enriched Egg with n-3 PUFAS. Atatürk Üniv Ziraat Fak Derg, 37 (2): 257-265, 2006
  2. Ruxton CHS, Derbyshire E, Gibson S: The nutritional properties and health benefit of eggs. Nutr Food Sci, 40 (3): 263-279, 2010. DOI: 10.1108/00346651011043961 3. De Menezes PC, de Lima ER, de Mederios JP, de Oliveira WNK, Evêncio-Neto J: Egg quality of laying hens in different conditions of storage, ages and housing densities. Rev Bras Zootec, 41 (9): 2064-2069, 2012. DOI: 10.1590/S1516-35982012000900014 4. Akyürek H, Okur AA: Effect of storage time, temperature and hen age on egg quality in free-range layer hens. J Anim Vet Adv, 8 (10): 1953-1958, 2009
  3. Akter Y, Kasim A, Omar H, Sazili AO: Effect of storage time and temperature on the quality characteristics of chicken eggs. J Food Agric Environ, 12 (3-4): 87-92, 2014
  4. Park YS, Yoo IJ, Jeon KH, Kim HK, Chang EJ, Oh HI: Effects of various eggshell treatments on the egg quality during storage. Asian Australas J Anim Sci, 16 (8): 1224-1229, 2003. DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2003.1224 7. Caner C, Yüceer M: Efficacy of various protein-based coating on enhancing the shelf life of fresh eggs during storage. Poult Sci, 94 (7): 1665-1677, 2015. DOI: 10.3382/ps/pev102 8. Anar Ş: Yumurta ve Yumurta Ürünleri. Yumurtanın Fiziksel Özellikleri. 30-35, Dora Yayınları, Bursa, 2016
  5. Yenilmez F, Uruk E, Serbester U, Çelik L: Farklı mevsimlerde toptancı ve tüketici koşullarında saklamanın yumurta kalitesi üzerine etkisi. Çukurova J Agric Food Sci, 32 (2): 61-68, 2017
  6. Al-Hajo NNA, Whaeep AAM, Rashid RS, Azeez AI, Al-Janab LFA, Musa TN, Al-Khalani FMHA: Effect of different coating material on egg quality. Acad J Sci, 1 (2): 257-264, 2012
  7. Turkish Food Codex Regulation on Egg Notification: Republic of Turkey Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Official Gazette Issue and Date: 29211 and 20 December 2014, Ankara, Turkey
  8. Tabidi MH: Impact of storage period and quality on composition of table egg. Adv Environ Biol, 5 (5): 856-861, 2011
  9. Reddy PM, Reddy VR, Reddy CV, Rao SP: Egg weight. shape index and hatchability in khaki Campbell duck egg. Ind J Poult Sci, 14, 26-31, 1979
  10. Doyon G, Bernier-Cardou M, Hamilton RMG, Castalgne F, Randall CJ: Egg quality 2. albumen quality of eggs from five commercial strains of white leghorn hens during one year of lay. Poult Sci, 65, 63-66, 1986. DOI: 10.3382/ps.0650063 15. Anderson KE, Tharring