Journals / Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 6

Optimisation of Indirect ELISA by Comparison of Different Antigen Preparations for Detection of Antibodies Against Schmallenberg Virus

Schmallenberg Virüs Antikorlarının Belirlenmesi İçin İndirekt ELISA’nın Farklı Antijenler Karşılaştırılarak Optimizasyonu

Pages
795–800
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although results of this study demonstrated that in-house ELISA for detection of SBV specific antibodies was equally sensitive and specific as commercial kit, purified SBV antigen based in-house ELISA development could increase S/P ratios.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Schmallenberg virus (SBV) infection, discovered in 2011, was reported in Europe including Turkey, Africa and recently in some Asian countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The best result in ELISA antigen preparation for SBV was gained by 30% PEG purification method followed by formaldehyde inactivation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although results of this study demonstrated that in-house ELISA for detection of SBV specific antibodies was equally sensitive and specific as commercial kit, purified SBV antigen based in-house ELISA development could increase S/P ratios.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Schmallenberg virus (SBV) infection, discovered in 2011, was reported in Europe including Turkey, Africa and recently in some Asian countries. Commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits were widely used by researchers in many epidemiological studies and SBV diagnosis. The aim of this study was to optimise indirect in-house ELISA that is based on different antigen preparations of cell-culture derived whole SBV particle. Antigen preparations were maintained with various methods: PEG precipitation, ultracentrifugation, dialysis, and antigen inactivation. Following antigen optimisation, steps of antigen coating, blocking, conjugate and stop solution were optimised and in-house ELISA was compared to commercial indirect SBV ELISA kit. The best result in ELISA antigen preparation for SBV was gained by 30% PEG purification method followed by formaldehyde inactivation. Although results of this study demonstrated that in-house ELISA for detection of SBV specific antibodies was equally sensitive and specific as commercial kit, purified SBV antigen based in-house ELISA development could increase S/P ratios.

Özet

Schmallenberg virüs (SBV) enfeksiyonu 2011 yılında keşfedilmiş ve enfeksiyon Türkiye dahil Avrupa kıtasında, Afrika’da ve bazı Asya ülkelerinde bildirilmiştir. Ticari ELISA kitleri çok sayıda epidemiyolojik çalışmada ve SBV tanısında sıklıkla kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, hücre kültüründen elde edilen tam SBV partikülünün farklı antijen hazırlama yöntemleri kullanılarak indirekt in-house ELISA optimizasyonudur. Antijen hazırlamak için; PEG presipitasyon, ultrasantrifüjleme, diyaliz ve antijen inaktivasyonu gibi farklı yöntemler kullanıldı. Antijen optimizasyonu sonrasında, antijen kaplama, bloklama, konjugat ve durdurma solüsyonları optimize edildi ve geliştirilen in-house ELISA ticari ELISA kiti ile kıyaslandı. ELISA antijen hazırlanmasında en iyi sonuçlar %30 PEG presipitasyon sonrasında formaldehit ile inaktivasyon sonucunda elde edildi. SBV özgül antikorların belirlenmesinde in-house ELISA ticari kit kadar duyarlı ve özgül olsa da saf SBV antijeni temelli in-house ELISA geliştirilmesinin S/P oranını yükseltebileceği düşünüldü.

🔖

Cite This Article

AZKUR, A. K., AKSOY, E., YILDIRIM, M., YILDIZ, K. (2022). Optimisation of Indirect ELISA by Comparison of Different Antigen Preparations for Detection of Antibodies Against Schmallenberg Virus. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 6, 795–800. https://ajindex.com/articles/569616

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Herder V, Wohlsein P, Peters M, Hansmann F, Baumgärtner W: Salient lesions in domestic ruminants infected with the emerging socalled Schmallenberg virus in Germany. Vet Pathol, 49 (4): 588-591, 2012. DOI: 10.1177/0300985812447831 2. Hoffmann B, Scheuch M, Höper D, Jungblut R, Holsteg M, Schirrmeier H, Eschbaumer M, Goller KV, Wernike K, Fischer M, Breithaupt A, Mettenleiter TC, Beer M: Novel orthobunyavirus in cattle, Europe, 2011. Emerg Infect Dis, 18 (3): 469-472, 2012. DOI: 10.3201/ eid1803.111905 3. Azkur AK, Albayrak H, Risvanli A, Pestil Z, Ozan E, Yılmaz O, Tonbak S, Cavunt A, Kadı H, Macun HC, Acar D, Özenç E, Alparslan S, Bulut H: Antibodies to Schmallenberg virus in domestic livestock in Turkey. Trop Anim Health Prod, 45 (8): 1825-1828, 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s11250-013- 0415-2 4. Tonbak S, Azkur AK, Pestil Z, Biyikli E, Abayli H, Baydar E, van der Poel WHM, Bulut H: Circulation of Schmallenberg virus in Turkey, 2013. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 40, 175-180, 2016. DOI: 10.3906/vet-1507-3 5. Yilmaz H, Hoffmann B, Turan N, Cizmecigil UY, Richt JA, Van der Poel WH: Detection and partial sequencing of Schmallenberg virus in cattle and sheep in Turkey. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis, 14 (3): 223-225, 2014. DOI: 10.1089/vbz.2013.1451 6. Macun HC, Azkur AK, Kalender H, Erat S: Seroprevalance of Schmallenberg virus and its relationship with some geographical features in sheep reared in Kirikkale. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, 64 (2): 93-97, 2012. 7. Sibhat B, Ayelet G, Gebremedhin EZ, Skjerve E, Asmare K: Seroprevalence of Schmallenberg virus in dairy cattle in Ethiopia. Acta Trop, 178, 61-67, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2017.10.024 8. Zhai SL, Lv DH, Wen XH, Zhu XL, Yang YQ, Chen QL, Wei WK: Preliminary serological evidence for Schmallenberg virus infection in China. Trop Anim Health Prod, 50 (2): 449-453, 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s11250- 017-1433-2 9. Zeynalova S, Vatani M, Asarova A, Lange CE: Schmallenberg virus in Azerbaijan 2012-2018. Arch Virol, 164 (7): 1877-1881, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/ s00705-019-04278-x 10. Veldhuis AM, van Schaik G, Vellema P, Elbers AR, Bouwstra R, van der Heijden HMJF, Mars MH: Schmallenberg virus epidemic in the Netherlands: Spatiotemporal introduction in 2011 and seroprevalence in ruminants. Prev Vet Med, 112 (1-2): 35-47, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j. prevetmed.2013.06.010 11. Bilk S, Schulze C, Fischer M, Beer M, Hlinak A, Hoffmann B: Organ distribution of Schmallenberg virus RNA in malformed newborns. Vet Microbiol, 159 (1-2): 236-238, 2012. DOI: